Literature DB >> 2318703

The "recall effect" in radiotherapy: is subeffective, reparable damage involved?

H Kitani1, T Kosaka, T Fujihara, K Lindquist, M M Elkind.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that lethal mutations among the progeny of a surviving cell could be the basis for the recall effect when chemotherapy is applied subsequent to the repair of normal-tissue injury resulting from a course of radiation therapy. Because radiotherapy is usually multifractionated, the possibility exists that repair of heritable injury of this type could occur between fractions as is the case for sublethal damage. To examine this possibility, the endpoint small-colony formation was used--an endpoint which integrates the effects of a number of radiation-induced aberrancies including lethal mutations--and low-dose-rate irradiation. It was found that, even after net surviving fractions comparable to those sought in radiotherapy were reached, little damage remained expressible as a deficiency in the size of the colony generated from a surviving cell. We conclude that the damage expressible as a lethal mutation is reparable and therefore the recall effect must be attributed to some other cellular mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2318703     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90078-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Antineoplastic drug-induced extravasation].

Authors:  Maike de Wit
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-11

2.  Chemotherapy-induced palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome--recall following different chemotherapy agents.

Authors:  Yuk Fung Hui; Francis J Giles; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Radiation recall in a patient with breast cancer treated for tuberculosis.

Authors:  M Extermann; N Vogt; M Forni; P Dayer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Slow clones, reduced clonogenicity, and intraclonal recovery in X-irradiated L5178Y-S cell cultures.

Authors:  J Z Beer; I Szumiel
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Do chemo- and radiotherapy affect the DNA repair ability of lymphocytes?

Authors:  E Kovacs; H Langemann; H Ludwig
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Radiation recall pneumonitis induced by nivolumab in a patient with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamura; Kazutoshi Okubo; Takeshi Takahashi; Kenji Mitsumori; Takashi Ishigaki; Hiroyuki Ohnishi
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2018-11-26

7.  Toxic risk of stereotactic body radiotherapy and concurrent helical tomotherapy followed by erlotinib for non-small-cell lung cancer treatment--case report.

Authors:  Chen-Hsi Hsieh; Hou-Tai Chang; Shih-Chiang Lin; Yu-Jen Chen; Li-Ying Wang; Yen-Ping Hsieh; Chien-An Chen; Ngot-Swan Chong; Shoei Long Lin; Chun-Yi Chen; Pei-Wei Shueng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Radiation recall with anticancer agents.

Authors:  Howard A Burris; Jane Hurtig
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-11-02

9.  Malignant thrombosis of the superior vena cava caused by non-small-cell lung cancer treated with radiation and erlotinib: a case with complete and prolonged response over 3 years.

Authors:  Jianyang Wang; Jun Liang; Wenqing Wang; Han Ouyang; Luhua Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  The incidence and management of cutaneous adverse events of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

Authors:  Witold Owczarek; Monika Słowińska; Aleksandra Lesiak; Magdalena Ciążyńska; Aldona Maciąg; Elwira Paluchowska; Luiza Marek-Józefowicz; Rafał Czajkowski
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 1.837

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.