Literature DB >> 23186634

Are lead-free hunting rifle bullets as effective at killing wildlife as conventional lead bullets? A comparison based on wound size and morphology.

Anna Trinogga1, Guido Fritsch, Heribert Hofer, Oliver Krone.   

Abstract

Fragmentation of the lead core of conventional wildlife hunting rifle bullets causes contamination of the target with lead. The community of scavenger species which feed on carcasses or viscera discarded by hunters are regularly exposed to these lead fragments and may die by acute or chronic lead intoxication, as demonstrated for numerous species such as white-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) where it is among the most important sources of mortality. Not only does hunting with conventional ammunition deposit lead in considerable quantities in the environment, it also significantly delays or threatens the recovery of endangered raptor populations. Although lead-free bullets might be considered a suitable alternative that addresses the source of these problems, serious reservations have been expressed as to their ability to quickly and effectively kill a hunted animal. To assess the suitability of lead-free projectiles for hunting practice, the wounding potential of conventional bullets was compared with lead-free bullets under real life hunting conditions. Wound dimensions were regarded as good markers of the projectiles' killing potential. Wound channels in 34 killed wild ungulates were evaluated using computed tomography and post-mortem macroscopical examination. Wound diameters caused by conventional bullets did not differ significantly to those created by lead-free bullets. Similarly, the size of the maximum cross-sectional area of the wound was similar for both bullet types. Injury patterns suggested that all animals died by exsanguination. This study demonstrates that lead-free bullets are equal to conventional hunting bullets in terms of killing effectiveness and thus equally meet the welfare requirements of killing wildlife as painlessly as possible. The widespread introduction and use of lead-free bullets should be encouraged as it prevents environmental contamination with a seriously toxic pollutant and contributes to the conservation of a wide variety of threatened or endangered raptors and other members of the guild of scavengers.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23186634     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Lead-free hunting rifle ammunition: product availability, price, effectiveness, and role in global wildlife conservation.

Authors:  Vernon George Thomas
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  The transition to non-lead rifle ammunition in Denmark: National obligations and policy considerations.

Authors:  Niels Kanstrup; Vernon G Thomas; Oliver Krone; Carl Gremse
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Reducing Lead on the Landscape: Anticipating Hunter Behavior in Absence of a Free Nonlead Ammunition Program.

Authors:  Loren Chase; Michael J Rabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Performance of lead-free versus lead-based hunting ammunition in ballistic soap.

Authors:  Felix Gremse; Oliver Krone; Mirko Thamm; Fabian Kiessling; René Hany Tolba; Siegfried Rieger; Carl Gremse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hunting of roe deer and wild boar in Germany: Is non-lead ammunition suitable for hunting?

Authors:  Annett Martin; Carl Gremse; Thomas Selhorst; Niels Bandick; Christine Müller-Graf; Matthias Greiner; Monika Lahrssen-Wiederholt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Levels of Metals in Kidney, Liver, and Muscle Tissue and their Influence on the Fitness for the Consumption of Wild Boar from Western Slovakia.

Authors:  Jozef Gašparík; Łukasz J Binkowski; Andrej Jahnátek; Peter Šmehýl; Milan Dobiaš; Norbert Lukáč; Martyna Błaszczyk; Magdalena Semla; Peter Massanyi
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Defining animal welfare standards in hunting: body mass determines thresholds for incapacitation time and flight distance.

Authors:  Sigbjørn Stokke; Jon M Arnemo; Scott Brainerd; Arne Söderberg; Morten Kraabøl; Bjørnar Ytrehus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fragmentation of hunting bullets observed with synchrotron radiation: Lighting up the source of a lesser-known lead exposure pathway.

Authors:  Adam F G Leontowich; Arash Panahifar; Ryan Ostrowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Harvest Programs in First Nations of Subarctic Canada: The Benefits Go Beyond Addressing Food Security and Environmental Sustainability Issues.

Authors:  Leonard J S Tsuji; Stephen R J Tsuji; Aleksandra M Zuk; Roger Davey; Eric N Liberda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.