Literature DB >> 2318589

Simultaneous pattern reversal ERG and VER recordings. Effect of stimulus field and central scotoma.

H Sakaue1, O Katsumi, M Mehta, T Hirose.   

Abstract

The effects of the sizes of the stimulus field and of an artificially created central scotoma on simultaneously recorded pattern-reversal electroretinogram (P-ERG) and pattern-reversal visual-evoked response (P-VER) were investigated. With an increase in the stimulus field from 4 degrees X 4 degrees to 12 degrees X 12 degrees, the amplitude of the P-ERG increased steadily. The amplitude of the P-VER also showed an increase up to a stimulus field of 6 degrees X 6 degrees or 8 degrees X 8 degrees, but showed no increase with further expansion of the stimulus field. A central scotoma, created by placing a square of black paper at the center of the 12 degrees X 12 degrees stimulus field, was increased from 4 degrees X 4 degrees to 10 degrees X 10 degrees by 2-degree increments. Amplitudes of both the P-ERG and the P-VER decreased with increasing central scotoma size. The P-VER decreased significantly with a 4 degrees X 4 degrees central scotoma. Although both the P-ERG and the P-VER were influenced by the overall stimulus field and the central scotoma, there was a distinct difference in their behavior. The P-VER showed saturation above a certain stimulus field size and, with a central scotoma of 4 degrees X 4 degrees, much more reduction than the P-ERG, suggesting that the P-VER depends more on the macular area than does the P-ERG. The P-ERG also exhibited a substantial macular dependency, which, however, was not as great as that of the P-VER. The greater macular dependency of the P-VER compared to the P-ERG, as observed in our study, reflects the larger anatomic representation of the macula at the higher visual level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2318589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  14 in total

1.  The exact estimation of visual acuity by VEP technology: a report of 726 cases of eye injury.

Authors:  Guangxun Rao; Bingwei Wu; Lingli Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-14

2.  Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP).

Authors:  Naveen K Yadav; Diana P Ludlam; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Comparison of the uniform-field electroretinogram and the pattern electroretinogram to checkerboard and bar gratings.

Authors:  Alexander J Lingley; Ange-Lynca Kantungane; Stuart G Coupland
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Colored focal visual evoked potentials by cathode ray tube versus scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  F Rigaudière; J F Le Gargasson; J E Guez; Y Grall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Influence of simultaneous pattern-reversal electroretinogram recording on visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Y Matsui; I Saito; S Okinami; S Oono
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential amplitudes are influenced by different stimulus field sizes and scotomata.

Authors:  A Junghardt; H Wildberger; Y Robert; B Török
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  ERGs, cone-isolating VEPs and analytical techniques in children with cone dysfunction syndromes.

Authors:  John P Kelly; Michael A Crognale; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Pattern electroretinogram, visual evoked potential and psychophysical functions in maculopathy.

Authors:  A Junghardt; H Wildberger; B Török
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Márta Janáky; Andrea Pálffy; Gyöngyi Horváth; Gábor Tuboly; György Benedek
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Effect of experimental scotoma size and shape on the binocular and monocular pattern visual evoked potential.

Authors:  I Geer; M M Spafford
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.