Literature DB >> 23185171

Reversal of large ischemic injury on hyper-acute diffusion MRI.

Ryuhei Yamada1, Yukihiro Yoneda, Yasufumi Kageyama, Keiji Ichikawa.   

Abstract

Reversal of early ischemic injury on diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) occurs rarely. In a stroke patient who abruptly developed stupor and left hemiparesis, DWI scanned 78 min after onset demonstrated a large ischemic injury in the right hemisphere with a DWI-ASPECTS (Albert Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score) of 5 points, although baseline brain CT was perfectly normal. MR angiography (MRA) showed an occlusion of the right middle cerebral artery trunk, and the patient received intravenous thrombolysis 105 min after onset. A second MRA 30 h later showed complete vessel recanalization, and DWI demonstrated a perfect reversal of the initial large ischemic injury, associated with very small thrombus-fragmented cortical surface infarctions. Outcome at 3 months was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0, and the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image showed only a small final infarction at the cortical surface. Hyper-acute DWI-defined large ischemic injury may very rarely represent a nearly perfect reversible area, and it may be a therapeutic target.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion-weighted MRI; Ischemic stroke; Reversal; Thrombolysis

Year:  2012        PMID: 23185171      PMCID: PMC3506037          DOI: 10.1159/000343948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Neurol        ISSN: 1662-680X


Introduction

Reversal or shrinkage of early ischemic injury demonstrated by diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is clinically uncommon, even after early thrombolytic reperfusion therapy [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. The DWI-defined early ischemic injury physiologically represents an irreversible ischemic core and a potentially reversible surrounding area [2]. Recently, we experienced the case of a nearly complete reversal of a hyper-acute large ischemic injury on DWI.

Case Report

A 67-year-old previously healthy woman suddenly developed stupor and left hemiparesis, and arrived at our hospital 45 min after symptom onset. Upon presentation, the National Institute of Heath Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 12 points, and baseline brain CT was perfectly normal. DWI (single-shot echo-planar, b = 1,000 s/mm2, TR = 8,000 ms, TE = 80.8 ms, slice thickness = 6 mm) performed on the 1.5T MR scanner (Signa 1.5T; General Electric, USA) imaged 78 min after onset demonstrated a large high-signal intensity area in the right hemisphere with a DWI-ASPECTS (Albert Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score [6]) of 5 points, and MR angiography (MRA) showed an occlusion of the right middle cerebral artery trunk (fig. ). Perfusion MRI was not performed. On the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, the mean ratio of the ADC value of ischemic to unaffected hemispheres was 0.86 (range 0.78–0.92) within the five DWI-ASPECTS-negative ischemic areas, and the mean ADC ratio was 0.99 (0.98–1.00) within the remaining five DWI-ASPECTS-positive non-ischemic areas. Accordingly, the patient received intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator at a lower dose of 0.6 mg/kg alteplase on the Japanese guideline [7]. The state of health of the patient was improved, and the NIHSS score 24 h later was of 0 points with minor left-sided numbness. The second DWI (b = 1,000 s/mm2, TR = 5,000 ms, TE = 55 ms, slice thickness = 5 mm) performed on the 3T MR scanner (Achieva 3T; Phillips, the Netherlands) imaged 30 h later showed a nearly complete reversal of the large high-signal intensity area demonstrated by initial DWI, and there were very small high-signal intensity spots at the cortical surface (fig. 1). MRA showed complete recanalization of the middle cerebral artery trunk. The mean ADC ratio was 1.00 (0.99–1.02) within the five areas of the initial DWI-ASPECTS-negative ischemic territory and 0.97 (0.88–1.01) within the remaining five initial DWI-ASPECTS-positive non-ischemic areas. The systemic work-up including cardiac and hematological profiles revealed the presence of patent foramen ovale and venous thrombus in her leg, suggesting a paradoxical brain embolism as an etiological mechanism for this stroke. The patient received anticoagulation with warfarin for secondary prevention. At 3 months, clinical outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0, and only minor final infarction was localized at the cortical surface on the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image (TR = 11,000 ms, TE = 125 ms, slice thickness = 5 mm) (fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Top row: initial DWI performed on a 1.5T MR scanner before thrombolysis demonstrates a large high-signal intensity area in the right hemisphere, and MRA shows an occlusion of the right middle cerebral artery trunk. Middle row: second DWI performed on a 3.0T MR scanner 30 h later shows perfect reversal of the initial large ischemic injury associated with small new cortical surface high-signal spots, and MRA displays complete vessel recanalization, suggesting scattered fragmentation of the initially occluded thrombus of the middle cerebral artery trunk. Bottom row: FLAIR image taken at 3 months shows only a small final infarction at the cortical surface.

Discussion

In this patient, after early thrombolytic reperfusion therapy, the initial DWI-defined large hemispheric ischemic injury showed nearly complete reversal on the follow-up DWI, and very small thrombus-fragmented ischemic areas after complete vessel recanalization were localized at the cortical surface of the terminal zone of the initially occluded middle cerebral artery. A limitation of this case study was the subtle low imaging quality of the hyper-acute DWI, due probably to body motion in acute confusion and to the simple acute stroke MRI protocol to minimize scan time in the emergency setting. To assess the ischemic injury more accurately, an advanced 3-tesla MR scanner was utilized at the later scans, although a difference of MRI scanner between hyper-acute and the later phases may affect the precise comparison of ischemic injury. Since a recent study reported that standard 1.5-tesla MR scanner, rather than 3-tesla MR scanner, provided a lower false-positive and false-negative rate for detecting DWI-defined early ischemic injury within 6 h after stroke [8], hyper-acute DWI imaged on a 1.5-tesla MR scanner might have been an optimal selection as acute stroke MRI protocol in this case study. The latest meta-analysis reported that the rate of complete or partial reversal of ischemic DWI lesions was surprisingly high by an average of 24%, varying from 0 to 83% probably due to the variable definition of the DWI reversibility [9]. Time of acute DWI scan from stroke onset, as well as time and type of sub-acute to chronic scans such as DWI, T2- or FLAIR image to assess the final infarct area, may affect frequency and size of the DWI reversibility [9]. A recent study reported that ‘true reversal’ of a DWI abnormality, defined by eliminating the false-positive reversal effect, was uncommon at only 7% in patients receiving early intravenous thrombolysis [1]. In this patient, nearly complete reversal of the initial DWI-defined large ischemic injury persisted on the 3-month follow-up FLAIR image. A previous study quantitatively measured severity or depth of ischemic injury by ADC values to define the threshold of the infarct process [10]. In the DWI-defined ischemic area, an ADC value below 80% of the unaffected area and no reperfusion were the factors of DWI irreversibility, but the exact threshold of the ADC value could not be determined [10]. In this patient, an ADC decline with an average of 86% in the DWI-defined ischemic area and early successful reperfusion may largely account for complete and sustained reversal, associated with a favorable clinical outcome. In conclusion, hyper-acute large ischemic injury demonstrated by DWI may very rarely represent a nearly perfect reversible area, and it may be a therapeutic target.
  10 in total

1.  Ischemic diffusion lesion reversal is uncommon and rarely alters perfusion-diffusion mismatch.

Authors:  T Chemmanam; B C V Campbell; S Christensen; Y Nagakane; P M Desmond; C F Bladin; M W Parsons; C R Levi; P A Barber; G A Donnan; S M Davis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for thrombolysis in acute cerebral infarct.

Authors:  N Hjort; K Butcher; S M Davis; C S Kidwell; W J Koroshetz; J Röther; P D Schellinger; S Warach; L Østergaard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score.

Authors:  P A Barber; A M Demchuk; J Zhang; A M Buchan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours of onset: Japan Alteplase Clinical Trial (J-ACT).

Authors:  Takenori Yamaguchi; Etsuro Mori; Kazuo Minematsu; Jyoji Nakagawara; Kazuo Hashi; Isamu Saito; Yukito Shinohara
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in acute stroke within the first 6 hours: 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla?

Authors:  C Rosso; A Drier; D Lacroix; G Mutlu; C Pires; S Lehéricy; Y Samson; D Dormont
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Relationships between cerebral perfusion and reversibility of acute diffusion lesions in DEFUSE: insights from RADAR.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Olivot; Michael Mlynash; Vincent N Thijs; Archana Purushotham; Stephanie Kemp; Maarten G Lansberg; Lawrence Wechsler; Roland Bammer; Michael P Marks; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Does diffusion-weighted imaging represent the ischemic core? An evidence-based systematic review.

Authors:  P G Kranz; J D Eastwood
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Predictors of apparent diffusion coefficient normalization in stroke patients.

Authors:  Jens Fiehler; Karina Knudsen; Thomas Kucinski; Chelsea S Kidwell; Jeffry R Alger; Götz Thomalla; Bernd Eckert; Oliver Wittkugel; Cornelius Weiller; Hermann Zeumer; Joachim Röther
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Late secondary ischemic injury in patients receiving intraarterial thrombolysis.

Authors:  Chelsea S Kidwell; Jeffrey L Saver; Sidney Starkman; Gary Duckwiler; Reza Jahan; Paul Vespa; J Pablo Villablanca; David S Liebeskind; Y Pierre Gobin; Fernando Vinuela; Jeffry R Alger
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Reversible diffusion-weighted lesion in a TIA patient without arterial recanalization: a case report.

Authors:  Yuka Terasawa; Yasuyuki Iguchi; Kazumi Kimura; Kazuto Kobayashi; Junya Aoki; Kensaku Shibazaki
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.181

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Mapping tissue pH in an experimental model of acute stroke - Determination of graded regional tissue pH changes with non-invasive quantitative amide proton transfer MRI.

Authors:  Enfeng Wang; Yin Wu; Jerry S Cheung; Takahiro Igarashi; Limin Wu; Xiaoan Zhang; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Fast diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) with Inherent COrrelation-based Normalization (ICON) enhances automatic segmentation of heterogeneous diffusion MRI lesion in acute stroke.

Authors:  Iris Yuwen Zhou; Yingkun Guo; Takahiro Igarashi; Yu Wang; Emiri Mandeville; Suk-Tak Chan; Lingyi Wen; Mark Vangel; Eng H Lo; Xunming Ji; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of Acute Infarction: Comparison with Routine Diffusion and Follow-up MR Imaging.

Authors:  Jianzhong Yin; Haizhen Sun; Zhiyun Wang; Hongyan Ni; Wen Shen; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  JOURNAL CLUB: Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of Stroke Lesion With Hemodynamic and Metabolic MRI in a Rodent Model of Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Dongshuang Lu; Yinghua Jiang; Yang Ji; Iris Yuwen Zhou; Emiri Mandeville; Eng H Lo; Xiaoying Wang; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.959

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.