Literature DB >> 2318517

Treatment of hypertension in the elderly: I. Blood pressure and clinical changes. Results of a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.

B J Materson1, W C Cushman, G Goldstein, D J Reda, E D Freis, E A Ramirez, F N Talmers, T J White, S Nunn, R H Chapman.   

Abstract

We compared the efficacy and adverse effects of antihypertensive drug regimens in 690 men past age 60 with diastolic blood pressure 90-114 mm Hg and systolic blood pressure less than 240 mm Hg. They received either a low (25-50 mg) or high (50-100 mg) dose of hydrochlorothiazide daily. Of 644 patients who completed the hydrochlorothiazide titration, 375 (58.2%) were responders (diastolic blood pressure less than 90 and less than or equal to 5 mm Hg below baseline) and 92.8% of these completed a 6-month maintenance period. Blood pressure was reduced from 157.6/98.5 mm Hg by 18.3/9.5 mm Hg with low dose hydrochlorothiazide and by 20.4/9.6 mm Hg with high dose hydrochlorothiazide; more patients achieved goal blood pressure with the high dose. Whites and blacks responded equally. Serum potassium less than 3.5 mmol/l occurred in 104 of 321 (32.3%) of the high dose versus 62 of 333 (18.6%) of the low dose hydrochlorothiazide patients. The 269 nonresponders to hydrochlorothiazide were randomly assigned in a double-blind study to receive hydralazine, methyldopa, metoprolol, or reserpine in addition to hydrochlorothiazide; 79.2% responded to the addition of the second drug and 87.3% of these completed a 6-month maintenance phase. Overall, there were no significant efficacy differences among the step 2 regimens. We conclude that the lower dose of hydrochlorothiazide was nearly as effective as the higher dose, and the addition of a second drug was effective and generally well tolerated in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2318517     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.15.4.348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Reserpine-diuretic combinations in therapy of arterial hypertension. Current considerations].

Authors:  M Siepmann; W Kirch
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-12-15

Review 2.  Management of mild hypertension. Selecting an antihypertensive regimen.

Authors:  E J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-01

Review 3.  Reserpine: a relic from the past or a neglected drug of the present for achieving cost containment in treating hypertension?

Authors:  G J Magarian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Reserpine reconsidered: no association with serious peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  R I Shorr; W A Ray; J R Daugherty; M R Griffin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of reserpine for primary hypertension.

Authors:  Sandy D Shamon; Marco I Perez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 6.  Optimising diuretic therapy in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  W C Cushman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  ACE inhibitors. Differential use in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Z H Israili; W D Hall
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Risk of thiazide-induced metabolic adverse events in older adults.

Authors:  Anil N Makam; W John Boscardin; Yinghui Miao; Michael A Steinman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 9.  Race and hypertension. What is clinically relevant?

Authors:  D R Rutledge
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Thiazide and loop diuretics.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica; Barry Carter; William Cushman; Lee Hamm
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.