Literature DB >> 23185098

Re-feeding food-deprived male meadow voles affects the sperm allocation of their rival males.

Ashlee A Vaughn1, Javier Delbarco-Trillo, Michael H Ferkin.   

Abstract

An individual's nutritional status affects the manner in which same- and opposite-sex conspecifics respond to that individual, which may affect their fitness. Male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, increase their sperm allocation if they encounter the scent mark of an unfamiliar male that is not nutritionally challenged. If, however, the scent mark comes from a male that has been food deprived for 24 hours, stud male voles do not increase their sperm allocation. Food deprived males may be viewed as being lower quality and a reduced risk of sperm competition by rival males. We hypothesized that stud males in promiscuous mating systems tailor their sperm allocations depending on whether rival males have been food deprived and then re-fed. We predicted that newly re-fed males will be considered a strong risk of sperm competition because of the potentially high fitness and survival costs associated with food deprivation in males, and that they will cause stud males to increase their sperm allocation. Our results, however, showed that the recovery period from 24 hours of food deprivation was a relatively slow process. It took between 96 hours and 336 hours of re-feeding male scent donors that were food deprived for 24 hours to induce stud males to increase their sperm allocation to levels comparable to when scent donors were not food deprived. Stud male voles may be conserving the amount of sperm allocated until the male scent donors have recovered from food deprivation and subsequent re-feeding.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23185098      PMCID: PMC3505090          DOI: 10.1111/eth.12016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethology        ISSN: 0179-1613            Impact factor:   1.897


  15 in total

Review 1.  The importance of the refeeding syndrome.

Authors:  M A Crook; V Hally; J V Panteli
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory.

Authors:  L Engqvist; K Reinhold
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Re-feeding and the restoration of odor attractivity, odor preference, and sexual receptivity in food-deprived female meadow voles.

Authors:  Andrew A Pierce; Michael H Ferkin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-03-31

4.  Food deprivation and the role of estradiol in mediating sexual behaviors in meadow voles.

Authors:  Andrew A Pierce; Izu Iwueke; Michael H Ferkin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-11-15

5.  The evolution of continuous variation in ejaculate expenditure strategy.

Authors:  Samuel J Tazzyman; Tommaso Pizzari; Robert M Seymour; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  Refeeding syndrome: what it is, and how to prevent and treat it.

Authors:  Hisham M Mehanna; Jamil Moledina; Jane Travis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-06-28

7.  Sperm investment in male meadow voles is affected by the condition of the nearby male conspecifics.

Authors:  Ashlee A Vaughn; Javier Delbarco-Trillo; Michael H Ferkin
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Lipid clearance and total parenteral nutrition: the importance of monitoring plasma lipids.

Authors:  M A Crook
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 9.  Neuroendocrine regulation of GnRH release in induced ovulators.

Authors:  J Bakker; M J Baum
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.606

10.  Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males.

Authors:  Javier Delbarco-Trillo; Michael H Ferkin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.