Literature DB >> 23185073

Effectiveness of wound closure with V-Loc 90 sutures in lipoabdominoplasty patients.

Vladimir Grigoryants1, Arpa Baroni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Barbed sutures have gained wider acceptance, especially among plastic surgeons. However, limited information exists about the effectiveness of wound closure using these sutures.
OBJECTIVES: The authors compare closure times and clinical outcomes of 2-layer wound closure using V-Loc 90 barbed sutures (Covidien, Inc, Mansfield, Massachusetts) with conventional, 3-layer closure with nonbarbed, nonlocking sutures.
METHODS: The lipoabdominoplasty wounds of 30 consecutive patients were divided into 2 equal halves, and the control and study halves of the wound were randomly assigned for each patient. On the control side, a conventional 3-layer wound closure (Scarpa's fascia, deep dermis, and upper dermis) was performed using polyglactin 910 and polyglecaprone 25 sutures. On the study side, the wound was closed in 2 layers (Scarpa's fascia and upper dermis) using a running suture of V-Loc 90 sutures. Closure of each layer and of the entire half of the wound was performed by a single surgeon and timed. Patients were followed for an average of 13 months postoperatively. Postoperative complications were recorded and scar appearance was evaluated with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS).
RESULTS: Data were collected from a total of 30 control and 30 study sides. The mean closure time for each layer was faster with barbed sutures than with nonbarbed sutures, and the total average closure time was 4.4 minutes (36.1%) faster using barbed sutures compared with conventional sutures (7.9 vs 12.3 minutes, respectively; P < .0001). Postoperative wound complications occurred in 4 (13.3%) control sides compared with 1 (3.3%) study side of the wound. The VSS scores were similar between the 2 sides. The lateral section of the scar received lower VSS scores than central sections.
CONCLUSIONS: Two-layer wound closure using V-Loc 90 barbed sutures was safe and faster and resulted in fewer postoperative complications than 3-layer closure with conventional, nonbarbed sutures. V-Loc 90 sutures did not produce better scar cosmesis. Wound closure with barbed sutures may be financially and clinically advantageous in lipoabdominoplasty patients as it requires less wound closure time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23185073     DOI: 10.1177/1090820X12467797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  6 in total

Review 1.  Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  James A Greenberg; Randi H Goldman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

2.  Use of a barbed suture tie-over technique for skin graft dressings: a case series.

Authors:  Kenneth M Joyce; Cormac W Joyce; Nicola Mahon; Jack L Kelly
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

3.  Comparison of strength of sacrocolpopexy mesh attachment using barbed and nonbarbed sutures.

Authors:  Marjorie L Pilkinton; Gregory C Levine; Laura Bennett; Harvey A Winkler; Dara F Shalom; Peter S Finamore
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  A Comparison of Barbed Sutures and Standard Sutures with regard to Wound Cosmesis in Panniculectomy and Reduction Mammoplasty Patients.

Authors:  Kristen Aliano; Michael Trostler; Indira Michelle Fromm; Alexander Dagum; Sami Khan; Duc Bui
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2016-11-29

5.  A New Suturing Method for Optimal Wound Healing: Technique and Experience.

Authors:  Nicolas M Abboud; Hiba El Hajj; Sofie Abboud; Saad Dibo; Marwan H Abboud
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 6.  The Efficacy and Safety of Knotless Barbed Sutures in the Surgical Field: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yifei Lin; Sike Lai; Jin Huang; Liang Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.