Literature DB >> 23184996

Cellular crowding imposes global constraints on the chemistry and evolution of proteomes.

Emmanuel D Levy1, Subhajyoti De, Sarah A Teichmann.   

Abstract

In living cells, functional protein-protein interactions compete with a much larger number of nonfunctional, or promiscuous, interactions. Several cellular properties contribute to avoiding unwanted protein interactions, including regulation of gene expression, cellular compartmentalization, and high specificity and affinity of functional interactions. Here we investigate whether other mechanisms exist that shape the sequence and structure of proteins to favor their correct assembly into functional protein complexes. To examine this question, we project evolutionary and cellular abundance information onto 397, 196, and 631 proteins of known 3D structure from Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Homo sapiens, respectively. On the basis of amino acid frequencies in interface patches versus the solvent-accessible protein surface, we define a propensity or "stickiness" scale for each of the 20 amino acids. We find that the propensity to interact in a nonspecific manner is inversely correlated with abundance. In other words, high abundance proteins have less sticky surfaces. We also find that stickiness constrains protein evolution, whereby residues in sticky surface patches are more conserved than those found in nonsticky patches. Finally, we find that the constraint imposed by stickiness on protein divergence is proportional to protein abundance, which provides mechanistic insights into the correlation between protein conservation and protein abundance. Overall, the avoidance of nonfunctional interactions significantly influences the physico-chemical and evolutionary properties of proteins. Remarkably, the effects observed are consistently larger in E. coli and S. cerevisiae than in H. sapiens, suggesting that promiscuous protein-protein interactions may be freer to accumulate in the human lineage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184996      PMCID: PMC3528536          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1209312109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  The Levinthal paradox of the interactome.

Authors:  Peter Tompa; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Nonspecific binding limits the number of proteins in a cell and shapes their interaction networks.

Authors:  Margaret E Johnson; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Structural invariants in protein folding.

Authors:  C Chothia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  PiQSi: protein quaternary structure investigation.

Authors:  Emmanuel D Levy
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Competition between folding, native-state dimerisation and amyloid aggregation in beta-lactoglobulin.

Authors:  Daizo Hamada; Toshiki Tanaka; Gian Gaetano Tartaglia; Amol Pawar; Michele Vendruscolo; Mei Kawamura; Atsuo Tamura; Naoki Tanaka; Christopher M Dobson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites.

Authors:  L Lo Conte; C Chothia; J Janin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-02-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Hydrophobicity scales: a thermodynamic looking glass into lipid-protein interactions.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; D Peter Tieleman
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 13.807

8.  Structural determinants of protein evolution are context-sensitive at the residue level.

Authors:  Eric A Franzosa; Yu Xia
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Intrinsic protein disorder and interaction promiscuity are widely associated with dosage sensitivity.

Authors:  Tanya Vavouri; Jennifer I Semple; Rosa Garcia-Verdugo; Ben Lehner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The selection of acceptable protein mutations.

Authors:  Rajkumar Sasidharan; Cyrus Chothia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  72 in total

Review 1.  Selection on protein structure, interaction, and sequence.

Authors:  Peter B Chi; David A Liberles
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Conserved proteins are fragile.

Authors:  Raquel Assis; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Diffusion within the cytoplasm: a mesoscale model of interacting macromolecules.

Authors:  Fabio Trovato; Valentina Tozzini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Lymphocyte repertoire selection and intracellular self/non-self-discrimination: historical overview.

Authors:  Donald R Forsdyke
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 5.  Searching for the Pareto frontier in multi-objective protein design.

Authors:  Vikas Nanda; Sandeep V Belure; Ofer M Shir
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-08-10

6.  Proteins evolve on the edge of supramolecular self-assembly.

Authors:  Hector Garcia-Seisdedos; Charly Empereur-Mot; Nadav Elad; Emmanuel D Levy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Chaperone-client interactions: Non-specificity engenders multifunctionality.

Authors:  Philipp Koldewey; Scott Horowitz; James C A Bardwell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Secreted Proteins Defy the Expression Level-Evolutionary Rate Anticorrelation.

Authors:  Felix Feyertag; Patricia M Berninsone; David Alvarez-Ponce
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The Many Nuanced Evolutionary Consequences of Duplicated Genes.

Authors:  Ashley I Teufel; Mackenzie M Johnson; Jon M Laurent; Aashiq H Kachroo; Edward M Marcotte; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 10.  Comparing protein folding in vitro and in vivo: foldability meets the fitness challenge.

Authors:  Karan S Hingorani; Lila M Gierasch
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.