BACKGROUND: Generalized social anxiety disorder (gSAD) is characterized by exaggerated amygdala reactivity to social signals of threat, but if and how the amygdala interacts with functionally and anatomically connected prefrontal cortex (PFC) remains largely unknown. Recent evidence points to aberrant amygdala connectivity to medial PFC in gSAD at rest, but it is difficult to attribute functional relevance without the context of threat processing. Here, we address this by studying amygdala-frontal cortex connectivity during viewing of fearful faces and at rest in gSAD patients. METHODS: Twenty patients with gSAD and 17 matched healthy controls (HCs) participated in functional magnetic resonance imaging of an emotional face matching task and a resting state task. Functional connectivity and psychophysiological interaction analysis were used to assess amygdala connectivity. RESULTS: Compared to HCs, gSAD patients exhibited less connectivity between amygdala and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) while viewing fearful faces. gSAD patients also showed less connectivity between amygdala and rostral ACC at rest in the absence of fearful faces. DLPFC connectivity was negatively correlated with LSASFear (where LSAS is Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale). CONCLUSIONS: Task and rest paradigms provide unique and important information about discrete and overlapping functional networks. In particular, amygdala coupling to DLPFC may be a phasic abnormality, emerging only in the presence of a social predictor of threat, whereas amygdala coupling to the rostral ACC may reflect both phasic and tonic abnormalities. These findings prompt further studies to better delineate intrinsic and externally evoked brain connectivity in anxiety and depression in relation to amygdala dysfunction.
BACKGROUND: Generalized social anxiety disorder (gSAD) is characterized by exaggerated amygdala reactivity to social signals of threat, but if and how the amygdala interacts with functionally and anatomically connected prefrontal cortex (PFC) remains largely unknown. Recent evidence points to aberrant amygdala connectivity to medial PFC in gSAD at rest, but it is difficult to attribute functional relevance without the context of threat processing. Here, we address this by studying amygdala-frontal cortex connectivity during viewing of fearful faces and at rest in gSADpatients. METHODS: Twenty patients with gSAD and 17 matched healthy controls (HCs) participated in functional magnetic resonance imaging of an emotional face matching task and a resting state task. Functional connectivity and psychophysiological interaction analysis were used to assess amygdala connectivity. RESULTS: Compared to HCs, gSADpatients exhibited less connectivity between amygdala and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) while viewing fearful faces. gSADpatients also showed less connectivity between amygdala and rostral ACC at rest in the absence of fearful faces. DLPFC connectivity was negatively correlated with LSASFear (where LSAS is Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale). CONCLUSIONS: Task and rest paradigms provide unique and important information about discrete and overlapping functional networks. In particular, amygdala coupling to DLPFC may be a phasic abnormality, emerging only in the presence of a social predictor of threat, whereas amygdala coupling to the rostral ACC may reflect both phasic and tonic abnormalities. These findings prompt further studies to better delineate intrinsic and externally evoked brain connectivity in anxiety and depression in relation to amygdala dysfunction.
Authors: D Cordes; V M Haughton; K Arfanakis; J D Carew; P A Turski; C H Moritz; M A Quigley; M E Meyerand Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nader Amir; Heide Klumpp; Jason Elias; Jeffrey S Bedwell; Nathan Yanasak; L Stephen Miller Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Amanda E Guyer; Jennifer Y F Lau; Erin B McClure-Tone; Jessica Parrish; Nina D Shiffrin; Richard C Reynolds; Gang Chen; R J R Blair; Ellen Leibenluft; Nathan A Fox; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine; Eric E Nelson Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-11
Authors: Philippe R Goldin; Tali Manber-Ball; Kelly Werner; Richard Heimberg; James J Gross Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Amy Krain Roy; Brenda E Benson; Kathryn A Degnan; Koraly Perez-Edgar; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox; Monique Ernst Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Jacqueline A Clauss; Suzanne N Avery; Ross M VanDerKlok; Baxter P Rogers; Ronald L Cowan; Margaret M Benningfield; Jennifer Urbano Blackford Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Jorge R Barrio; Gary W Small; Koon-Pong Wong; Sung-Cheng Huang; Jie Liu; David A Merrill; Christopher C Giza; Robert P Fitzsimmons; Bennet Omalu; Julian Bailes; Vladimir Kepe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrea L Gold; Tomer Shechner; Madeline J Farber; Carolyn N Spiro; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Jennifer C Britton Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Autumn Kujawa; Minjie Wu; Heide Klumpp; Daniel S Pine; James E Swain; Kate D Fitzgerald; Christopher S Monk; K Luan Phan Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2016-07