Literature DB >> 23184386

Gender differences in osteoporosis screening: retrospective analysis.

Khaled Alswat1, Suzanne Myers Adler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a common disease affecting 20 % of all men. It accounts for more than 1.5 million fractures yearly in the USA. Up to 20 % of patients who sustain hip fractures die within the first 12 months from related complications. The Endocrine Society recommends screening all men 70 years or older regardless of risk factors. There are little data comparing gender-specific osteoporosis screening rates. The aim of the study is to identify any gender difference in osteoporosis screening.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to determine the screening rates for osteoporosis in males and females in our Division of Internal Medicine, university-based outpatient clinic (UBC). Males aged 70–75 years and females aged 65–70 years with a primary care physician (PCP) at our UBC, who have had at least one routine health maintenance exam (HME) since 2002, were included.
RESULTS: A total of 8,262 patients who met the age criteria were identified: 3,255 (39.4 %) males and 5,007 (60.6 %) females. Of the 3,255 male patients, 342 patients had their PCP at our UBC and had at least one HME; of those, 63 patients had DXA performed for an osteoporosis screening rate of 18.4 %. Of the 5,007 female patients, 668 patients had their PCP at our UBC and had at least one HME; of those, 402 patients had DXA performed for an osteoporosis screening rate of 60 %.
CONCLUSION: Males are screened less frequently although they have a comparable prevalence of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184386     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-012-0113-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  10 in total

1.  UNDERSTANDING OSTEOPOROSIS SCREENING PRACTICES IN MEN: A NATIONWIDE PHYSICIAN SURVEY.

Authors:  Palak Choksi; Brittany L Gay; David Reyes-Gastelum; Megan R Haymart; Maria Papaleontiou
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  How Can We Improve Osteoporosis Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Quality Improvement Strategies for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Understanding Osteoporosis Screening Practices in Men: A Nationwide Physician Survey.

Authors:  Palak Choksi; Brittany L Gay; David Reyes-Gastelum; Megan R Haymart; Maria Papaleontiou
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Relationship between muscle performance and DXA-derived bone parameters in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  H Singh; D Kim; M G Bemben; D A Bemben
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 5.  Gender Disparities in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Khaled A Alswat
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-04-01

6.  Lack of Bone Mineral Density Testing in Men With Hypogonadism: A Clinical Conundrum.

Authors:  Travis Goettemoeller; James Bena; Kevin M Pantalone
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2022-08-16

7.  Prevalence and Risk Factors of Discordance Between Hip and Spinal Bone Mineral Density Among Saudi Subjects.

Authors:  Homoud Al Zaid; Muhannad S Alamri; Abdulhadi A AlOfair; Faisal S Alqusaiyer; Adel I Alorainey; Mohammad I Alasqah; Riad A Sulimani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-04

8.  Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stefan Zechmann; Nathalie Scherz; Oliver Reich; Beat Brüngger; Oliver Senn; Thomas Rosemann; Stefan Neuner-Jehle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Effect of duration of diabetes on bone mineral density: a population study on East Asian males.

Authors:  Miso Jang; Hyunkyung Kim; Shorry Lea; Sohee Oh; Jong Seung Kim; Bumjo Oh
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.763

10.  High detection rate of osteoporosis with screening of a general hospitalized population: a 6-year study in 6406 patients in a university hospital setting.

Authors:  Olivier Malaise; Marie Detroz; Mathieu Leroy; Lorenzo Leonori; Laurence Seidel; Michel G Malaise
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.