Literature DB >> 23184263

A modified laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly in children with hematological disorder: a single institute retrospective clinical research.

Xiao-Geng Deng1, Anu Maharjan, Jing Tang, Rong-Lin Qiu, Yao-Hao Wu, Jie Zhang, Jia-Jia Zhou, Le-Xiang Zeng, Mei-Jin Chen, Yi-Qin Xiang, Jie-Min Deng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the optimal acceptance of its clinical advantages, laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) emerged as a gold standard procedure as compared with open splenectomy (OS). However, it is still controversial and even counted as contraindication for massive splenomegaly. Here, we aim to summarize the experiences, characteristics and trends of modified LS for massive splenomegaly in children with hematological disorders.
METHODS: Retrospective series of 57 pediatric patients with massive splenomegaly who underwent splenectomy from March 2007 to December 2011 were designated for this clinical analysis. The main outcome measures were dealt by statistics. For 30 cases of LS, we strictly adhered to the principle of using only three trocars to operate and initial ligation of the splenic artery, followed by retrieving the piecemeal of spleen through an accessory incision of 2-3 cm at 12 mm trocar port site.
RESULTS: Of the 57 pediatric patients, 27 underwent OS and 30 underwent LS, respectively. Despite the operative time being shorter for OS than for LS (P < 0.001), the blood loss was lower in LS than in OS (P < 0.001); the time required for oral intake as well as duration of hospital stay was lower in LS than in OS (P < 0.001). Post-operatively, 7 (25.9 %) complications occurred in OS and 3 (10 %) in LS. The conversion rate of LS to OS was 13.33 % in four cases till 2009.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the conflicting reports regarding the safety of LS for massive splenomegaly, we demonstrated that our modified laparoscopic splenectomy in the treatment of children with massive splenomegaly in hematological diseases seemed to achieve the fundamental goal of less invasion; it was safe and feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184263     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-012-3215-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  30 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Regeneration of the spleen and splenic autotransplantation.

Authors:  R J Holdsworth
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  [Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case].

Authors:  B Delaitre; B Maignien
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1991 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 1.228

4.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: consensus and debatable points.

Authors:  Mohammed N Bani Hani; Ghazi R Qasaimeh; Kamal E Bani-Hani; Nizar R Alwaqfi; Abdel Rahman A Al Manasra; Yousef S Matani; Khled M El-Radaideh
Journal:  S Afr J Surg       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 0.375

5.  Pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  S Tulman; G W Holcomb; H L Karamanoukian; J Reynhout
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy.

Authors:  A Park; M Marcaccio; M Sternbach; D Witzke; P Fitzgerald
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-11

7.  Early ligation of the splenic artery in the leaning spleen approach to laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  Chinnasamy Palanivelu; Kalpesh Jani; Vijaykumar Malladi; Roshan Shetty; Rangasamy Senthilkumar; Gobi Maheshkumar
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Effect of spleen size on splenectomy outcome. A comparison of open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E M Targarona; J J Espert; G Cerdán; C Balagué; J Piulachs; G Sugrañes; V Artigas; M Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  B Habermalz; S Sauerland; G Decker; B Delaitre; J-F Gigot; E Leandros; K Lechner; M Rhodes; G Silecchia; A Szold; E Targarona; P Torelli; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  LigaSure vessel sealing system in laparoscopic Palomo varicocele ligation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Antonio Marte; Maria Domenica Sabatino; Micaela Borrelli; Pasquale Cautiero; Mercedes Romano; Antonio Vessella; Pio Parmeggiani
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.878

View more
  4 in total

1.  Perioperative spleen embolization as a useful tool in laparoscopic splenectomy for simple and massive splenomegaly in children: a prospective study.

Authors:  E Van Der Veken; M Laureys; G Rodesch; H Steyaert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Massive splenomegaly in children: laparoscopic versus open splenectomy.

Authors:  Mohamed E Hassan; Khalid Al Ali
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Spleen size evaluation in children: Time to define splenomegaly for pediatric surgeons and pediatricians.

Authors:  Gloria Pelizzo; Marinella Guazzotti; Catherine Klersy; Ghassan Nakib; Federico Costanzo; Erika Andreatta; Gabrio Bassotti; Valeria Calcaterra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Successful Splenectomy for Hypersplenism in Wilson's Disease: A Single Center Experience from China.

Authors:  Liang-Yong Li; Wen-Ming Yang; Huai-Zhen Chen; Yun-Hu Wu; Xiang Fang; Jing Zhang; Zhen Wang; Yong-Sheng Han; Yu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.