| Literature DB >> 23183887 |
Chuangjun Li1, Li Li, Chao Wang, Jingzhi Yang, Fei Ye, Jinying Tian, Yikang Si, Dongming Zhang.
Abstract
A new ursane-type nortriterpenoid, (11S,12S)-4-methyl-11,12-epoxy-2-hydroxy-3-oxoursa-1,4-dine-28-oic acid γ-lactone (1), named ulmoidol A, together with ten known compounds: ulmoidol (2), corosolic acid (3), 2α,3α-dihydroxy-24-nor-4(23),12-oleanadien-28-oic acid (4), oleanolic acid (5), ursolic acid (6), cycloart-3β, 25-diol (7), foliasalacioside B1 (8), (6R,7E,9R)-9-hydroxy-4,7-megastigmadien-3-one-9-O-α-L-arabinopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranoside (9), (6R,7E,9R)-9-hydroxy-4,7-megastigma-dien-3-one-9-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranoside (10), and quercetin 3-O-sambubioside (11) were isolated from the leaves of Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. The structure of compound 1 was determined by extensive spectroscopic analysis, and its absolute configuration was determined by CD experiments and a computational method. Compounds 3, 4, 7–10 were isolated from this plant for the first time. Compounds 3 and 4 showed inhibition to PTPIB activities, with IC(50) values of 0.69 and 3.98 μM, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23183887 PMCID: PMC6268547 DOI: 10.3390/molecules171213960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–11.
NMR data of compound 1 in CDCl3 (500 MHz for 1H-NMR and 125 MHz for 13C-NMR).
| Position | 1H | 13C |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.47 s | 123.22 |
| 2 | 144.88 | |
| 2-OH | 6.23 s | |
| 3 | 181.44 | |
| 4 | 127.34 | |
| 5 | 163.62 | |
| 6 | 2.50 (td, 13.5, 4.5) | 24.10 |
| 7 | 1.39 m | 31.93 |
| 8 | 41.68 | |
| 9 | 1.75 (brs) | 47.72 |
| 10 | 41.91 | |
| 11 | 3.38 (dd, 4.0, 2.0) | 54.71 |
| 12 | 3.08 (d, 4.0) | 56.60 |
| 12 | ||
| 13 | 88.67 | |
| 14 | 41.68 | |
| 15 | 1.11(dd,14.0,5.5) | 27.20 |
| 16 | 2.13 (td, 13.5, 5.5) | 22.68 |
| 17 | 45.10 | |
| 18 | 1.79 m | 60.46 |
| 19 | 0.97 m | 40.20 |
| 20 | 1.67m | 37.50 |
| 21 | 1.60 m1.25 m | 30.49 |
| 22 | 1.81 m | 31.32 |
| 23 | 2.01 s | 10.89 |
| 25 | 1.40 s | 22.44 |
| 26 | 1.33 s | 19.13 |
| 27 | 0.97 s | 16.21 |
| 28 | 178.83 | |
| 29 | 1.18 (d, 6.5) | 17.16 |
| 30 | 0.98 (d, 5.5) | 19.46 |
Figure 2Key HMBC and ROESY correlations of 1.
Figure 3The optimized geometry of compound 1 and two possible structures 1a and 1b.
Figure 4Comparison of theoretical and experimental ECD and UV spectra of compound 1.
The inhibition to PTP1B activities of compounds 1–6, 8–10.
| Comp. | Inhibition (%) at 10 μM |
|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8 |
| 2 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 81.3 |
| 4 | 79.8 |
| 5 | 28.3 |
| 6 | 43.5 |
| 8 | 13.4 |
| 9 | 28.6 |
| 10 | 17.8 |
| CCCFO6240 a | 108.5 |
a Positive control.
Figure 5Inhibition of Compounds 3 (A) and 4 (B) on PTP1B activity in vitro.