Literature DB >> 23182455

Uncorrected visual acuity and noncycloplegic autorefraction predict significant refractive errors in Taiwanese preschool children.

Yu-Hung Lai1, Han-Yi Tseng, Hsin-Tien Hsu, Shun-Jen Chang, Hwei-Zu Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), stereopsis, and noncycloplegic autorefraction (NCAR) tests performed by vision-screening technicians and to determine the best referral criteria when using these methods to screen for significant refractive errors in preschool children.
DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control, and cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed 1000 records for a population-based preschool vision-screening program. The target conditions were defined as myopia ≤-3.0 diopters (D), hyperopia ≥ 4.5 D, astigmatism ≥ 2.0 D, and anisometropia ≥ 2.0 D.
METHODS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate optimal referral cutoff values. The examination results obtained by the vision-screening technicians were compared with those obtained by a pediatric ophthalmologist, which were considered the gold standard. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The efficacies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) of different tests were evaluated.
RESULTS: In 7.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-8.7) of the children, at least 1 eye showed 1 of the target conditions. If only the right eyes were considered, the prevalence of target conditions was 4.2% (95% CI, 2.9-5.5). The ROC curve analysis indicated that the NCAR cylinder test (cutoff value ≥ 0.875 D) was the best test for screening target conditions. With regard to age groups, UCVA ≤ 0.75 (Snellen equivalent) and ≤ 0.85 were the best referral criteria for ages ≤ 4 years and ≥ 5 years, respectively. Combining the UCVA test with the NCAR test (the child was referred after failing both tests) increased specificity without significantly decreasing sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: The UCVA and NCAR tests performed by vision-screening technicians are adequately sensitive and specific for preschool vision screening. The ROC curve analysis was used for determining the appropriate screening criteria for these tests, and combining the tests increased their accuracy. The screening criteria should be age dependent. When analyzing the test accuracy in ophthalmic problems, if the disease of interest does not symmetrically (in terms of disease severity and prevalence) involve both eyes, the prevalence based on only 1 eye should be interpreted with caution.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182455     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  11 in total

1.  Proportion and characteristic of emmetropia in schoolchildren aged 6-11y: the Shenzhen elementary school eye study.

Authors:  Xian-Ming Jiang; Ying-Ying Lu; Xiao Han; Qian Tan; Jun-Shu Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Axial length/corneal radius ratio: association with refractive state and role on myopia detection combined with visual acuity in Chinese schoolchildren.

Authors:  Xiangui He; Haidong Zou; Lina Lu; Rong Zhao; Huijuan Zhao; Qiangqiang Li; Jianfeng Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.

Authors:  Peiyao Jin; Jianfeng Zhu; Haidong Zou; Lina Lu; Huijuan Zhao; Qiangqiang Li; Xiangui He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.

Authors:  Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Samantha K Simkin; Melissa Thomson; Benjamin Thompson; Andrew V Collins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Shuyu Xiong; Minzhi Lv; Haidong Zou; Jianfeng Zhu; Lina Lu; Bo Zhang; Junjie Deng; Chunxia Yao; Xiangui He; Xun Xu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  The characteristics of premature infants with transient corneal haze.

Authors:  Yu-Hung Lai; Hsiu-Lin Chen; San-Nan Yang; Shun-Jen Chang; Lea-Yea Chuang; Wen-Chuan Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.

Authors:  Tao Li; Xiaodong Zhou; Jie Zhu; Xiaojing Tang; Xiaoyan Gu
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  School-based epidemiology study of myopia in Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Jiaxing Wang; Ying Li; Zhenyang Zhao; Nan Wei; Xiaoli Qi; Gang Ding; Xue Li; Jing Li; Linlin Song; Ying Zhang; Richard Hyun Yi; Yuxian Ning; Xiaoyu Zeng; Ning Hua; Xuehan Qian
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 9.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children.

Authors:  Padmaja Sankaridurg; Xiangui He; Thomas Naduvilath; Minzhi Lv; Arthur Ho; Earl Smith; Paul Erickson; Jianfeng Zhu; Haidong Zou; Xun Xu
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.