Literature DB >> 23182395

Duodenal and other gastrointestinal toxicity in cervical and endometrial cancer treated with extended-field intensity modulated radiation therapy to paraaortic lymph nodes.

Philip D Poorvu1, Cheryl A Sadow, Kanokpis Townamchai, Antonio L Damato, Akila N Viswanathan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the rates of acute and late duodenal and other gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities among patients treated for cervical and endometrial cancers with extended-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (EF-IMRT) to the paraaortic nodes and to analyze dose-volume relationships of GI toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-three patients with endometrial or cervical cancer underwent EF-IMRT to the paraaortic nodes, of whom 46 met the inclusion criteria for GI toxicity and 45 for duodenal toxicity analysis. The median prescribed dose to the paraaortic nodes was 54 Gy (range, 41.4-65 Gy). The 4 duodenal segments, whole duodenum, small bowel loops, peritoneum, and peritoneum plus retroperitoneal segments of colon were contoured retrospectively, and dosimetric analysis was performed to identify dose-volume relationships to grade ≥3 acute (<90 day) and late (≥90 day) GI toxicity.
RESULTS: Only 3/46 patients (6.5%) experienced acute grade ≥3 GI toxicity and 3/46 patients (6.5%) experienced late grade ≥3 GI toxicity. The median dose administered to these 6 patients was 50.4 Gy. One of 12 patients who received 63 to 65 Gy at the level of the renal hilum experienced grade 3 GI toxicity. Dosimetric analysis of patients with and without toxicity revealed no differences between the mean absolute or fractional volumes at any 5-Gy interval between 5 Gy and the maximum dose. None of the patients experienced duodenal toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of paraaortic nodes with IMRT is associated with low rates of GI toxicities and no duodenal-specific toxicity, including patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy. This technique may allow sufficient dose sparing of the bowel to enable safe dose escalation to at least 65 Gy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182395     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  Radiation modality use and cardiopulmonary mortality risk in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Steven H Lin; Ning Zhang; Joy Godby; Jingya Wang; Gary D Marsh; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; Linus Ho; Wayne L Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Reza J Mehran; Thomas A Buchholz; Linda S Elting; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  The role of para-aortic nodal irradiation in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Adela Poitevin Chacón; Jessica Chavez-Nogueda; Rubí Ramos-Prudencio; Michelle Aline Villavicencio-Queijeiro; Francisco Lozano-Ruiz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-09

3.  A novel dynamic field-matching technique for treatment of patients with para-aortic node-positive cervical cancer: Clinical experience.

Authors:  Craig Baden; Alexander Whitley; Javier López-Araujo; Richard Popple; Jun Duan; Robert Kim
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-11-21

Review 4.  Chemotherapy and molecular therapy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Gabriela Olivia Regalado Porras; Jessica Chávez Nogueda; Adela Poitevin Chacón
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-09-27

Review 5.  Does para-aortic irradiation reduce the risk of distant metastasis in advanced cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucas Gomes Sapienza; Maria José Leite Gomes; Vinicius Fernando Calsavara; Mario M Leitao; Glauco Baiocchi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Management of nodal recurrences of endometrial cancer with IMRT.

Authors:  Jennifer C Ho; Pamela K Allen; Anuja Jhingran; Shannon N Westin; Karen H Lu; Patricia J Eifel; Ann H Klopp
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Radiation treatment in older patients: a framework for clinical decision making.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Proton Therapy Reduces Normal Tissue Dose in Extended-Field Pelvic Radiation for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Melody J Xu; Alisha Maity; Jennifer Vogel; Maura Kirk; Huifang Zhai; Stefan Both; Lilie L Lin
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-03-21

9.  Para-Aortic Nodal Radiation in the Definitive Management of Node-Positive Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jason C Sanders; Donald A Muller; Sunil W Dutta; Taylor J Corriher; Kari L Ring; Timothy N Showalter; Kara D Romano
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.