Literature DB >> 23182352

Reproductive performance in a select sample of dairy herds.

James D Ferguson1, Andrew Skidmore.   

Abstract

Sixteen herds were selected from a pool of 64 herds nominated by consultants for participation in a national survey to demonstrate excellence in reproductive performance. For inclusion in the survey, herds had to have comprehensive records in a farm computer database or participate in a Dairy Herd Improvement Association record system and have superior reproductive performance as judged by the herd advisor. Herd managers were asked to fill out a questionnaire to describe their reproductive management practices and provide herd records for data analysis. Reproductive analysis was based on individual cow records for active and cull dairy cows that calved during the calendar year 2010. Breeding records by cow were used to calculate indices for insemination rate (IR), conception rate (CR), pregnancy rate (PR), and culling. Herds ranged in size from 262 to 6,126 lactating and dry cows, with a mean of 1,654 [standard deviation (SD) 1,494] cows. Mean days to first insemination (DFS) was 71.2d (SD 4.7d), and IR for first insemination was 86.9%. Mean days between inseminations were 33.4d (SD 3.1d), and 15.4% of insemination intervals were greater than 48 d (range: 7.2 to 21.5%). First-service conception rate was 44.4% (SD 4.8%) across all herds and ranged from 37.5 to 51.8%. Mean PR was 32.0% (SD 3.9%) with a range of 26.5 to 39.4%. Lactation cull rate was 32.2% (SD 12.4%) with a range from 13.6 to 58.1%. Compared with mean data and SD for herds in the Raleigh Dairy Herd Improvement Association system, mean indices for these herds ranked them in the 99 th percentile for IR (using heat detection rate as comparison), 99 th percentile for PR, the bottom 18.6 percentile for DFS, and around the 50th percentile for CR. This suggests that excellent herd reproductive performance was associated with reproductive management that resulted in high insemination rates combined with average CR.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182352     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

Review 1.  Circadian clocks and their integration with metabolic and reproductive systems: our current understanding and its application to the management of dairy cows.

Authors:  Theresa M Casey; Karen Plaut
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Key Performance Indicators Used by Dairy Consultants During the Evaluation of Reproductive Performance in a First Visit.

Authors:  Ramon Armengol; Lorenzo Fraile; Alex Bach
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  Success rate of artificial insemination, reproductive performance and economic impact of failure of first service insemination: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Belege Tadesse; Abadi Amare Reda; Nuredin Teshale Kassaw; Wedajo Tadeg
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Reproductive Performance in a Selected Sample of Dairy Farms in Una-Sana Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Authors:  Adis Softic; Adam Dunstan Martin; Eystein Skjerve; Nihad Fejzic; Teufik Goletic; Aida Kustura; Erik Georg Granquist
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2020-03-16

5.  Relationship between sire predicted transmitting ability for daughter pregnancy rate and daughter's reproductive performance and milk production in Japanese dairy herds.

Authors:  Keisuke Koyama; Takayoshi Takahashi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Factors affecting conception rate after the first artificial insemination in a private dairy cattle farm in North Algeria.

Authors:  Samir Souames; Zahra Berrama
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-12-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.