Literature DB >> 23182082

Escherichia coli survival in waters: temperature dependence.

R A Blaustein1, Y Pachepsky, R L Hill, D R Shelton, G Whelan.   

Abstract

Knowing the survival rates of water-borne Escherichia coli is important in evaluating microbial contamination and making appropriate management decisions. E. coli survival rates are dependent on temperature, a dependency that is routinely expressed using an analogue of the Q₁₀ model. This suggestion was made 34 years ago based on 20 survival curves taken from published literature, but has not been revisited since then. The objective of this study was to re-evaluate the accuracy of the Q₁₀ equation, utilizing data accumulated since 1978. We assembled a database of 450 E. coli survival datasets from 70 peer-reviewed papers. We then focused on the 170 curves taken from experiments that were performed in the laboratory under dark conditions to exclude the effects of sunlight and other field factors that could cause additional variability in results. All datasets were tabulated dependencies "log concentration vs. time." There were three major patterns of inactivation: about half of the datasets had a section of fast log-linear inactivation followed by a section of slow log-linear inactivation; about a quarter of the datasets had a lag period followed by log-linear inactivation; and the remaining quarter were approximately linear throughout. First-order inactivation rate constants were calculated from the linear sections of all survival curves and the data grouped by water sources, including waters of agricultural origin, pristine water sources, groundwater and wells, lakes and reservoirs, rivers and streams, estuaries and seawater, and wastewater. Dependency of E. coli inactivation rates on temperature varied among the water sources. There was a significant difference in inactivation rate values at the reference temperature between rivers and agricultural waters, wastewaters and agricultural waters, rivers and lakes, and wastewater and lakes. At specific sites, the Q₁₀ equation was more accurate in rivers and coastal waters than in lakes making the value of the Q₁₀ coefficient appear to be site-specific. Results of this work indicate possible sources of uncertainty to be accounted for in watershed-scale microbial water quality modeling. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182082     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  21 in total

1.  Capturing Microbial Sources Distributed in a Mixed-use Watershed within an Integrated Environmental Modeling Workflow.

Authors:  Gene Whelan; Keewook Kim; Rajbir Parmar; Gerard F Laniak; Kurt Wolfe; Michael Galvin; Marirosa Molina; Yakov A Pachepsky; Paul Duda; Richard Zepp; Lourdes Prieto; Julie L Kinzelman; Gregory T Kleinheinz; Mark A Borchardt
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.288

2.  Enrichment of stream water with fecal indicator organisms during baseflow periods.

Authors:  Yakov Pachepsky; Matthew Stocker; Manuel Olmeda Saldaña; Daniel Shelton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Impact of Metazooplankton Filter Feeding on Escherichia coli under Variable Environmental Conditions.

Authors:  Niveen S Ismail; Brittney M Blokker; Tyler R Feeney; Ruby H Kohn; Jingyi Liu; Vivian E Nelson; Mariah C Ollive; Sarah B L Price; Emma J Underdah
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Landscape-Scale Factors Affecting the Prevalence of Escherichia coli in Surface Soil Include Land Cover Type, Edge Interactions, and Soil pH.

Authors:  Nicholas Dusek; Austin J Hewitt; Kaycie N Schmidt; Peter W Bergholz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Reliability theory for microbial water quality and sustainability assessment.

Authors:  Allen Teklitz; Christopher Nietch; M Sadegh Riasi; Lilit Yeghiazarian
Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.722

6.  Temporal Stability of Escherichia coli Concentrations in Waters of Two Irrigation Ponds in Maryland.

Authors:  Yakov Pachepsky; Rachel Kierzewski; Matthew Stocker; Kevin Sellner; Walter Mulbry; Hoonsoo Lee; Moon Kim
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Irrigation waters and pipe-based biofilms as sources for antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Ryan A Blaustein; Daniel R Shelton; Jo Ann S Van Kessel; Jeffrey S Karns; Matthew D Stocker; Yakov A Pachepsky
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Temporal stability of E. coli and Enterococci concentrations in a Pennsylvania creek.

Authors:  Dong Jin Jeon; Yakov Pachepsky; Cary Coppock; M Dana Harriger; Rachael Zhu; Edward Wells
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Long-term changes in microbial water quality indicators in a hydro-power plant reservoir: The role of natural factors and socio-economic changes.

Authors:  Gunta Spriņġe; Māris Bērtiņš; Lesya Gnatyshyna; Ilga Kokorīte; Agnese Lasmane; Valery Rodinov; Oksana Stoliar
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 6.943

10.  Precipitation effects on microbial pollution in a river: lag structures and seasonal effect modification.

Authors:  Andreas Tornevi; Olof Bergstedt; Bertil Forsberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.