Literature DB >> 23182012

Initial electrical stimulation frequency and cramp threshold frequency and force.

Kevin C Miller1, Kenneth L Knight.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In the electrically induced cramp model, the tibial nerve is stimulated at an initial frequency of 4 Hz with increases in 2-Hz increments until the flexor hallucis brevis cramps. The frequency at which cramping occurs (ie, threshold frequency [TF]) can vary considerably. A potential limitation is that multiple subthreshold stimulations before TF might induce fatigue, which is operationally defined as a decrease in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) force, thereby biasing TF.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if TF is similar when initially stimulated at 4 Hz or 14 Hz and if MVIC force is different among stimulation frequencies or over time (precramp, 1 minute postcramp, and 5 minutes postcramp).
DESIGN: Crossover study.
SETTING: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty participants (13 males: age = 20.6 ± 2.9 years, height = 184.4 ± 5.7 cm, mass = 76.3 ± 7.1 kg; 7 females: age = 20.4 ± 3.5 years, height = 166.6 ± 6.0 cm, mass = 62.4 ± 10.0 kg) who were prone to cramps. INTERVENTION(S): Participants performed 20 practice MVICs. After a 5-minute rest, three 2-second MVICs were recorded and averaged for the precramp measurement. Participants were stimulated at either 4 Hz or 14 Hz, and the frequency was increased in 2-Hz increments from each initial frequency until cramp. The MVIC force was reevaluated at 1 minute and 5 minutes postcramp. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The TF and MVIC force.
RESULTS: Initial stimulation frequency did not affect TF (4 Hz = 16.2 ± 3.8 Hz, 14 Hz = 17.1 ± 5.0 Hz; t(19) = 1.2, P = .24). Two participants had inaccurate TFs when initially stimulated at 14 Hz; they cramped at 10 and 12 Hz in the 4-Hz condition. The MVIC force did not differ between initial frequencies (F(1,19) = 0.9, P = .36) but did differ over time (F(2,38) = 5.1, P = .01). Force was lower at 1 minute postcramp (25.1 ± 10.1 N) than at precramp (28.7 ± 7.8 N; P, .05) but returned to baseline at 5 minutes postcramp (26.7 ± 8.9 N; P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The preferred initial stimulation frequency might be 4 Hz because it did not alter or overestimate TF. The MVIC force was lower at 1 minute postcramp, suggesting the induced cramp rather than the varying electrical frequencies affected force. A 1- to 5-minute rest should be provided postcramp induction if multiple cramps are induced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182012      PMCID: PMC3499888          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.5.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  17 in total

1.  Reliability of an electrical method to induce muscle cramp.

Authors:  Marcus B Stone; Jeffrey E Edwards; J Patrick Babington; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Experimental muscle pain decreases the frequency threshold of electrically elicited muscle cramps.

Authors:  Mariano Serrao; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Hong-You Ge; Francesco Pierelli; Giorgio Sandrini; Dario Farina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Aetiology of skeletal muscle 'cramps' during exercise: a novel hypothesis.

Authors:  M P Schwellnus; E W Derman; T D Noakes
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Duration of electrically induced muscle cramp increased by increasing stimulation frequency.

Authors:  Kevin C Miller; Kenneth L Knight; Steven R Wilding; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 1.931

5.  The influence of muscular lengthening on cramps.

Authors:  L Bertolasi; D De Grandis; L G Bongiovanni; G P Zanette; M Gasperini
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Motor-unit discharge rates in maximal voluntary contractions of three human muscles.

Authors:  F Bellemare; J J Woods; R Johansson; B Bigland-Ritchie
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Contractile speed and EMG changes during fatigue of sustained maximal voluntary contractions.

Authors:  B Bigland-Ritchie; R Johansson; O C Lippold; J J Woods
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of fatigue on the stretch reflex in a human muscle.

Authors:  C Balestra; J Duchateau; K Hainaut
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-02

9.  Dynamic and static stretch responses in muscle spindle receptors in fatigued muscle.

Authors:  D L Nelson; R S Hutton
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Stretch sensitivity of Golgi tendon organs in fatigued gastrocnemius muscle.

Authors:  R S Hutton; D L Nelson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  4 in total

1.  Acute Passive Static Stretching and Cramp Threshold Frequency.

Authors:  Gino Panza; Justin Stadler; Donal Murray; Nicholas Lerma; Tomas Barrett; Ryan Pettit-Mee; Jeffrey E Edwards
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  H-reflex and M-wave responses after voluntary and electrically evoked muscle cramping.

Authors:  Jan-Frieder Harmsen; Christopher Latella; Ricardo Mesquita; Alessandro Fasse; Moritz Schumann; Michael Behringer; Janet Taylor; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Reduces Leg Cramps in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disorders: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jan-Frieder Harmsen; Anna Sistig; Alessandro Fasse; Michael Hackl; Kilian Wegmann; Michael Behringer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-11-09

4.  Comparison of the Spasmolytic Effects of Jakyak-Gamcho Decoctions Derived via Different Extractants.

Authors:  Dongwook Kwak; Changwoo Lee; Inseong Kong; JaeChul Lee; Donghee Choi; Changsu Na
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.