| Literature DB >> 23181114 |
Aina He1, Weixiang Qi, Yujing Huang, Tao Feng, Jie Chen, Yuanjue Sun, Zan Shen, Yang Yao.
Abstract
Identifying prognostic factors for osteosarcoma (OS) aids in the selection of patients who require more aggressive management. CD133 has been found to be a prognostic factor of certain tumor types. However, the association between CD133 expression and the prognosis of OS remains unknown. In this study, we analyzed the association of CD133 expression in OS with clinical factors and overall survival, and further investigated its potential role in metastasis in vitro. We found CD133 expression in 65.7% (46/70) of OS samples using immunohistochemistry, and it was positively correlated with lung metastasis analyzed by Chi-square test (P=0.002) and shorter overall survival time using the Kaplan-Meier method compared by log-rank test (P=0.000). Multivariate analysis showed that CD133 expression was an independent prognostic factor of patients with OS. To test for direct participation of CD133, we separated CD133(+) and CD133(-) cells in the MG63 cell line using magnetic-activated cell sorting and found that CD133(+) cells were more active in migration by scratch wound-healing assay and invasion by Matrigel invasion assay compared with CD133(-) cells. Elevated mRNA expression of the stemness gene octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct-4) and NANOG, and the metastasis-related receptor C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) were also found in CD133(+) cells by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Thus, expression of CD133 was correlated with lung metastasis and poor prognosis in OS patients. CD133(+) cells may be a type of cancer stem cell with high expression of self-renewal capacity and metastasis-related genes.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23181114 PMCID: PMC3503795 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2012.603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
List of primer sets used in this study.
| Gene (GenBank accession no.) | Sequence (5′ to 3′) | Tm (°C) | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4 (NM_002701) | |||
| Forward | CTTGAATCCCGAATGGAAAGGG | 61 | 42–63 |
| Reverse | GTGTATATCCCAGGGTGATCCTC | 205–183 | |
| NANOG (NM_024865) | |||
| Forward | TTTGTGGGCCTGAAGAAAACT | 61 | 83–103 |
| Reverse | AGGGCTGTCCTGAATAAGCAG | 198–178 | |
| CXCR4 (NM_003467) | |||
| Forward | TGACGGACAAGTACAGGCTG | 61 | 215–234 |
| Reverse | AGGGAAGCGTGATGACAAAGA | 277–257 | |
| GAPDH (NM_002046) | |||
| Forward | AAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCAAC | 61 | 7–27 |
| Reverse | GGGGTCATTGATGGCAACAATA | 108–87 | |
Correlation between CD133 expression and clinico-pathological factors in the osteosarcoma patients.
| Variable | n | CD133
| P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | |||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 35 | 26 | 9 | 0.131 |
| Female | 35 | 20 | 15 | |
| Age | ||||
| ≤18 years | 41 | 24 | 17 | 0.233 |
| >18 years | 29 | 21 | 8 | |
| Tumor location | ||||
| Axial | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.773 |
| Upper limb | 5 | 4 | 1 | |
| Lower limb | 64 | 40 | 24 | |
| Tumor size | ||||
| <10 cm | 38 | 22 | 16 | 0.224 |
| ≥10 cm | 32 | 23 | 9 | |
| Ennecking stage | ||||
| II | 58 | 35 | 23 | 0.130 |
| III | 12 | 10 | 2 | |
| Local recurrence | ||||
| Yes | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0.937 |
| No | 50 | 32 | 18 | |
| Lung metastasis | ||||
| Yes | 54 | 40 | 14 | 0.002 |
| No | 16 | 5 | 11 | |
Figure 1Immunohistochemical analysis of CD133 staining. (A) Positive; (B) negative. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 2Log-rank survival analysis of osteosarcoma patients according to CD133 expression.
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of potential prognostic factors for osteosarcoma patients.
| B | SE | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp (B) | 95% CI for Exp (B)
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| CD133 expression | 1.135 | 0.310 | 13.391 | 1 | 0.000 | 3.112 | 1.694 | 5.716 |
| Local recurrence | 0.438 | 0.287 | 2.320 | 1 | 0.128 | 1.549 | 0.882 | 2.720 |
| Lung metastasis | 0.336 | 0.338 | 0.984 | 1 | 0.321 | 1.399 | 0.721 | 2.716 |
| Tumor size | 0.551 | 0.266 | 4.287 | 1 | 0.038 | 1.734 | 1.030 | 2.921 |
Figure 3Identification of CD133+ and CD133− cells. (A) Detection of CD133+ cells in the MG-63 cells by flow cytometry. (B) CD133+ cells under fluorescent light. (C) CD133− cells under fluorescent light. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Expression of CD133 protein in MG-63, CD133+ and CD133− cells, as analyzed by western blotting. β-actin was used as an internal control.
Figure 4Migratory ability of CD133+ and CD133− cells. The distance between the edges of the scratch became increasingly narrow in the CD133+ cells. There were notable differences between the groups at 24 h. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM from three separate experiments. *P<0.05.
Figure 5Invasive ability of the CD133+ and CD133− cells. The membranes were stained with Giemsa after removal of cells from the chambers [(A) CD133+ cells; (B) CD133− cells)]. Scale bar, 100 μm. (C) Quantitative measurement of the invaded cells. Data shown as mean ± SEM from four separate experiments. *P<0.05.
Figure 6RT-PCR analysis of Oct-4, NANOG and CXCR4 in CD133+ and CD133− cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *P<0.05.