Literature DB >> 23181004

Concordance with ASCO guidelines for surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment: a population-based analysis.

Jeffrey J Sisler1, Bosu Seo, Alan Katz, Emma Shu, Daniel Chateau, Piotr Czaykowski, Debrah Wirtzfeld, Harminder Singh, Donna Turner, Patricia Martens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensive surveillance after curative treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with improved overall survival. This study examined concordance with the 2005 ASCO surveillance guidelines at the population level.
METHODS: A cohort of 250 patients diagnosed with stage II or III CRC in 2004 and alive 42 months after diagnosis was identified from health administrative data in Manitoba, Canada. Colonoscopy, liver imaging, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing were assessed over 3 years. Guidelines were met if patients had at least one colonoscopy in 3 years and at least one liver imaging test and three CEA tests annually. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the effect of patient and physician characteristics and disease and treatment factors on guideline concordance.
RESULTS: Guidelines for colonoscopy, liver imaging, and CEA were met by 80.4%, 47.2%, and 22% of patients, respectively. Guideline concordance for colonoscopy was predicted by annual contact with a surgeon, higher income, and the diagnosis of colon (rather than rectal) cancer. Adherence was lower in those older than 70 years and with higher comorbidity. For liver imaging, significant predictors were annual contact with an oncologist, receipt of chemotherapy, and diagnosis of colon cancer. Concordance with CEA guidelines was higher with annual contact with an oncologist and high levels of family physician contact, and lower in urban residents, in those older than 70, and in those with stage II disease.
CONCLUSION: Completion of recommended liver imaging and CEA testing fall well below guidelines in Manitoba, whereas colonoscopy is better provided. Addressing this gap should improve outcomes for CRC survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23181004      PMCID: PMC3396835          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  30 in total

1.  Cancer physicians' attitudes toward colorectal cancer follow-up.

Authors:  C C Earle; E Grunfeld; D Coyle; M C Cripps; H S Stern
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Jeffery; B E Hickey; P N Hider
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

3.  Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline.

Authors:  Christopher E Desch; Al B Benson; Mark R Somerfield; Patrick J Flynn; Carol Krause; Charles L Loprinzi; Bruce D Minsky; David G Pfister; Katherine S Virgo; Nicholas J Petrelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The impact of margin status on local recurrence following breast conserving therapy for invasive carcinoma in Manitoba.

Authors:  K Hardy; K Fradette; R Gheorghe; L Lucman; S Latosinsky
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Community compliance with carcinoembryonic antigen: follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer L Spratlin; David Hui; John Hanson; Charles Butts; Heather-Jane Au
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.481

7.  Improving colorectal cancer follow-up: the dedicated single-visit colorectal cancer follow-up clinic.

Authors:  Lean-Peng Cheah; David M Hemingway
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Results of a national survey among Dutch surgeons treating patients with colorectal carcinoma. Current opinion about follow-up, treatment of metastasis, and reasons to revise follow-up practice.

Authors:  I Grossmann; G H de Bock; C J H van de Velde; J Kievit; T Wiggers
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Developing and piloting a nurse-led model of follow-up in the multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gillian Knowles; Linda Sherwood; Malcom G Dunlop; Gail Dean; Duncan Jodrell; Catriona McLean; Elizabeth Preston
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 2.398

Review 10.  Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline.

Authors:  Alvaro Figueredo; R Bryan Rumble; Jean Maroun; Craig C Earle; Bernard Cummings; Robin McLeod; Lisa Zuraw; Caroline Zwaal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  9 in total

1.  Continuity of care of colorectal cancer survivors at the end of treatment: the oncology-primary care interface.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Sisler; Jill Taylor-Brown; Zoann Nugent; Donna Bell; Masud Khawaja; Piotr Czaykowski; Debrah Wirtzfeld; Jason Park; Shahida Ahmed
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Variation in positron emission tomography use after colon cancer resection.

Authors:  Christina E Bailey; Chung-Yuan Hu; Y Nancy You; Harmeet Kaur; Randy D Ernst; George J Chang
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Population-based estimates of survival and cost for metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  C E McCarron; S Ernst; J Q Cao; G S Zaric
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Approaches to Address Premature Death of Patients When Assessing Patterns of Use of Health Care Services After an Index Event.

Authors:  Montika Bush; Ross J Simpson; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Gang Fang; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Sally W Vernon; L Kay Bartholomew; Caitlin C Murphy; Shirley M Bluethmann
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Clinical Pattern of Recurrent Disease during the Follow-Up of Rectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Thijs Wieldraaijer; Pascal Bruin; Laura A M Duineveld; Pieter J Tanis; Anke B Smits; Henk C P M van Weert; Jan Wind
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 7.  Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Patrick E Young; Craig M Womeldorph; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Bjorn Brucher; Alex Stojadinovic; Itzhak Avital; Aviram Nissan; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  Interventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer R Tomasone; Melissa C Brouwers; Marija Vukmirovic; Eva Grunfeld; Mary Ann O'Brien; Robin Urquhart; Melanie Walker; Fiona Webster; Margaret Fitch
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-09-06

9.  Factors Influencing Adherence to Recommended Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: Experiences and Behaviors of Colorectal Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Katherine R Sterba; Kent Armeson; Angela M Malek; Kendrea D Knight; Jane Zapka
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.771

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.