Literature DB >> 23180790

DDBJ new system and service refactoring.

Osamu Ogasawara1, Jun Mashima, Yuichi Kodama, Eli Kaminuma, Yasukazu Nakamura, Kousaku Okubo, Toshihisa Takagi.   

Abstract

The DNA data bank of Japan (DDBJ, http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp) maintains a primary nucleotide sequence database and provides analytical resources for biological information to researchers. This database content is exchanged with the US National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) within the framework of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC). Resources provided by the DDBJ include traditional nucleotide sequence data released in the form of 27 316 452 entries or 16 876 791 557 base pairs (as of June 2012), and raw reads of new generation sequencers in the sequence read archive (SRA). A Japanese researcher published his own genome sequence via DDBJ-SRA on 31 July 2012. To cope with the ongoing genomic data deluge, in March 2012, our computer previous system was totally replaced by a commodity cluster-based system that boasts 122.5 TFlops of CPU capacity and 5 PB of storage space. During this upgrade, it was considered crucial to replace and refactor substantial portions of the DDBJ software systems as well. As a result of the replacement process, which took more than 2 years to perform, we have achieved significant improvements in system performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23180790      PMCID: PMC3531146          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

The DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) is one of three databanks that constitute the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) (1–4), which was established through close collaboration with the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) and the US National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The DDBJ is dedicated to promotion, support, dissemination and use of biological data as public resources, and provides biological databases and accompanying analytic services geared for those purposes. As part of the INSDC, DDBJ databases support the traditional assembled sequence archive known as ‘Trad’, the sequence read archive (SRA) for raw reads of new generation sequencers (5), and the BioProject and BioSample databases (6,7). Furthermore, DDBJ databases also support registration and auxiliary software systems. The DDBJ is a division in the National Institute of Genetics (NIG) and is funded as a supercomputer centre with a 5-year replacement cycle. In 2012, the year the system was due for replacement, we took the opportunity to meet the dramatic increase in the demand of computational resources in genomics. In this article, we report on submissions to DDBJ databases in 2012, provide background information on the new supercomputer system and discuss the progress made in refactoring of our software tools.

DDBJ ARCHIVAL DATABASES IN 2012

DDBJ traditional assembled sequence archive

Between July 2011 and June 2012, 15 243 000 entries and 12 270 462 217 base pairs (BP) were added to the DDBJ periodical release. This periodical release, also known as the INSD core traditional nucleotide flat files, does not include whole-genome shotgun (WGS) and third party annotation (TPA) files (8). The DDBJ contributed 17.8% of the entries and 12.0% of the base pairs added to the core nucleotide data of INSD in total. Most of the nucleotide data records provided to the DDBJ (97.8%) were submitted by Japanese researchers; the rest came from Korea (1.29%), China (0.57%), Taiwan (0.04%) and other countries and regions (0.31%). Furthermore, the DDBJ has continuously distributed sequence data in published patent applications from the Japan Patent Office (JPO, http://www.jpo.go.jp) and the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO, http://www.kipo.go.kr/en). The JPO transferred their data to the DDBJ directly, whereas the KIPO transferred their data through an arrangement with the Korean Bioinformation Center (KOBIC). A detailed statistical breakdown of the number of records is shown on the DDBJ homepage (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/breakdown_stats/prop_ent.html#prop_ent-table). In addition to the core nucleotide data, the DDBJ has also released a total of 2 646 472 WGS entries, 35 531 425 MGA entries, 704 TPA entries, 6374 TPA-WGS entries and 1272 TPA-CON entries, as of 27 August 2012. Noteworthy large-scale data released from DDBJ are listed in Table 1. As can be seen in that table, the DDBJ has released the following: transcriptome shotgun assemblies (TSA) and expressed sequence tags (EST) of a green alga (Botryococcus braunii) submitted by the National Institute for Environmental Studies; Acropora digitifera genome submitted by the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology; sea squirt (Halocynthia roretzi) EST submitted by the University of Tokushima; sake yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kyokai No. 7) genome submitted by the National Research Institute of Brewing; EST and full length silkworm cDNAs (Bombyx mori) submitted by the National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences; two phases of liver fluke (Clonorchis sinensis) draft genomes submitted by Sun Yat-sen University (China); Human 5′SAGE tags submitted by the University of Tokyo; Hitomebore rice (Oryza sativa Japonica Group cv. Hitomebore) genome submitted by the Iwate Biotechnology Research Center; full length cDNAs of pig (Sus scrofa) submitted by the National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences; eucaly (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) genome submitted by the Kazusa DNA Research Institute; wheat (Triticum aestivum) EST submitted by Yokohama City University; honeybee (Apis mellifera carnica) EST submitted by RIKEN; human EST submitted by RIKEN; EST of Asian Swallowtail (Papilio xuthus) and Common Mormon (Papilio polytes) submitted by the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST).
Table 1.

List of large-scale data released by the DDBJ from July 2011 to June 2012

TypeOrganismAccession number (number of entries)
GenomeA. digitiferascaffold CON: DF093604–DF097774 (4171 entries)
WGS: BACK01000001–BACK01053640 (53 640 entries)
Sake yeast (S. cerevisiae Kyokai no. 7)scaffold CON: DG000037–DG000052 (14 entries)
WGS: BABQ01000001–BABQ01000705 (705 entries)
Mitochondrion: AP012028 (1 entry)
Liver fluke (C. sinensis)Phase 1
scaffold CON: DF126616–DF142827 (16 212 entries)
WGS: BADR01000001–BADR01060778 (60 778 entries)
Phase 2
WGS: BADR02000001–BADR02006190 (6190 entries)
scaffold CON: DF142828-DF145382 (2555 entries)
Hitomebore rice (O. sativa Japonica Group cv. Hitomebore)scaffold CON: DG000053–DG000064 (12 entries)
WGS: BACJ01000001–BACJ01064745 (64 745 entries)
Eucaly (E. camaldulensis)scaffold CON: DF097775–DF126446 (28 672 entries)
WGS: BADO01000001–BADO01274001 (274 001 entries)
Full-length cDNASilkworm (B. mori)AK377185–AK388575 (11 160 entries; 231 entries dropped)
Pig (S. scrofa)AK389169–AK401026(11 858 entries)
TSAB. brauniiFX056085–FX112549 (56 465 entries)
ESTB. brauniiFY358876–FY368220 (9,345 entries)
Sea squirt (H. roretzi)FY844421–FY896670 (52 250 entries)
Silkworm (B. mori)FS724152–FS939542, FY736910–FY762881 (241 363 entries)
Eucaly (E. camaldulensis)FY782538–FY841121 (58 584 entries)
Bread wheat (T. aestivum)HX000001–HX201765, HX247045–HX257200 (211 921 entries)
Honey bee (A. m. carnica)HX282115–HX373155 (91 041 entries)
Human (H. sapiens)HY000001–HY377477 (377 477 entries)
Asian Swallowtail (P. xuthus)FY174038–FY210626 (36 589 entries)
Common Mormon (P. polytes)FY302525–FY358875 (56 351 entries)
MGAHuman (H. sapiens)AEAAA0000001–AEAAA0026367, AEAAB0000001–AEAAB0012114,
AEAAC0000001–AEAAC0021096, AEAAD0000001–AEAAD0024262,
AEAAE0000001–AEAAE0023437, AEAAF0000001–AEAAF0030485,
AEAAG0000001–AEAAG0021798, AEAAH0000001–AEAAH0040734,
AEAAI0000001–AEAAI0029614, AEAAJ0000001–AEAAJ0030206 (260 113 entries)
List of large-scale data released by the DDBJ from July 2011 to June 2012

Sequence read archive

A Japanese genetic researcher Masaru Tomita (Director of the Keio University Institute for Advanced Biosciences) published a full-genome sequence through DDBJ SRA under the accession number DRA000583. This was the first time a Japanese person had released their personal genome under his/her actual name.

BioProject and BioSample databases

With the advent of applications of sequencing devices, some sequenced samples may be analysed in different ways. Similarly, one project may submit multiple data sets to INSD. For the convenience of data submitters, the EBI and NCBI started to organize samples in the BioSample database and project information in the BioProject database (6,7). In late 2012, the DDBJ started to accept submissions to the BioProject database under the tripartite data exchange framework. To date, the DDBJ accepted >500 projects. Additionally, the DDBJ began preparations to join the BioSample framework developed by the NCBI and EBI. The DDBJ team is developing a submission system that encourages submission of samples that comply with the standards developed by the Genomic Standard Consortium (9). All those submissions will be integrated under the submission entrance portal.

SYSTEM RENEWAL

Outline of the new computer system

In March 2012, we completely replaced our computer system, which will be used for the three following purposes: to construct INSD and archiving nucleotide sequence data, to provide search and analysis services for the sequence data, including large-scale computational annotation of genome sequences, to provide computational resources to the researchers by providing a login portal to the computer system. The new DDBJ computer system will be required to accommodate an ∼1000-fold data increase for the same amount of funding. To achieve this, it was necessary to replace the current hardware and software with much more cost effective and high-performance models. Therefore, our new hardware system was designed from the concept stage as a commodity cluster based (Beowulf type) supercomputer system. Furthermore, even though their purchase was deemed sensible as part of efforts to implement a high reliability, large-scale, distributed system 5 years ago, it was also necessary to refactor substantial portions of our software because the previous systems were highly dependent on specific purposed proprietary hardware and middleware. These included the distributed database management systems, the full text keyword search system and the HTTP servers. The theoretical peak performance of the CPUs in the new system is 122.5 TFlops (maximum performance Rmax is 82.90), which ranks our system as 280th in the Supercomputer Top 500 list (as of June 2012, http://www.top500.org/). The system also boasts 2 PB high-speed HDDs (Lustre file storage system, http://www.lustre.org/) for calculation, and 3 PB of massive array of idle disks (MAID) storage for data archiving. In addition, for computer systems aimed at large data analysis, it is important to ensure sufficient I/O interconnection bandwidth and a swift data transmission rate between calculation nodes and storage systems. Therefore, in our system, calculation nodes in the cluster system are interconnected with 40 Gbps InfiniBand via fat topology, which provides a total theoretical I/O bandwidth of 980 Gbps. This system also includes computers with huge memory (10 fat and TB and 2 TB medium nodes), which are especially useful for de novo assembly of deep sequenced data. Taken together, the overall CPU performance of the new system is now approximately six times faster than the previous system, and its disk space is five times larger. Further system enhancements are planned in 2014, which will roughly double all aspects of the newly installed system. More specifically, peak performance will reach approximately 400 TFlops and the total size of the storage system will reach 12.5 PB, about 20 and 10 times the size of the previous system, respectively. The general increase in CPU performance is now 1.22 times/year (10), so the performance improvement for the new system significantly exceeds what would be expected based in this area alone. The major improved aspects of the software system are as follows: The processing time for the entire DDBJ release data (about one hundred and forty million records) decreased from several days to 4–10 hr. Those improvements have enabled us to simplify the logic of daily data processing as a whole. The insertion rate of flat file data to DDBJ GetEntry database system increased from 100 records per second to between 3000 and 10 000 records per second. This has helped us to more smoothly manage database history information dating back to the inauguration of the DDBJ. Due to I/O bandwidth improvements to the storage system and the increased CPU performance, the processing rate of the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) (11) is now from 10 to 100 times faster than was possible with the previous system.

Refactoring DDBJ services

Part of the replacement and upgrade process involves migration of our system to open source software. This is still in progress due to the immense size of the various elements. In this section, we will provide an overview of the current state of DDBJ services. Although some of the DDBJ service functions may seem less powerful than the previous versions, it is important to remember that we are now working to recover those functions and believe that full refactoring of the DDBJ system will result in overall improvements to our services in the near future. (i) Keyword search system (ARSA) The DDBJ keyword search system has been migrated from the proprietary Shunsaku search engine based on the SIGMA algorithm (12,13), which is an extension of the Aho–Corasick string matching algorithm (14), to the Apache Lucene Ver. 3.1. and Apache Solr Ver. 3.1 (http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html) open source software systems. These are the most widely used full text search engines based on the inverted index algorithm. The previous search engine operated in parallel for divided data stored on the memory, which made the search process fast and allowed input of complex queries with XPath syntax. This feature enabled our user to perform data retrieval by using terms in Feature/Qualifier identifiers of INSDC format. However, because of the practical scalability limitations, that system could not hold all DDBJ data, so EST, GSS, WGS, MGA data could not be searched. In the new DDBJ keyword search system, the web application was completely reimplementated to resolve the practical scalability limitations of the previous search engine. In the new system, not only normal divisions of INSD, but also EST, GSS, WGS have been made searchable. That scalability problem has been successfully resolved and our new system is now (Nov, 2012) running on a small commodity cluster system. It is anticipated that we will soon be moving the system onto the new supercomputer (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

In the new DDBJ keyword search system, the web application was completely reimplementated to resolve the practical scalability limitations of the previous search engine. In the new system, not only normal divisions of INSD, but also EST, GSS, WGS have been made searchable.

(ii) WebBlast, TXSearch and ClustalW. In the new system, the DDBJ restored a web-based BLAST tool with its original graphical user interface. The original package was NCBI BLAST 2.2.25 (11) and the prepared blast databases span all DDBJ’s databases, including patents and the latest daily sequences. A selection box for INSDC division is also available. TXSearch is a DDBJ-developed taxonomy database retrieval system that was unified by DDBJ, GenBank and ENA. This system is expected to be helpful as a reference for taxonomic names when researchers submit nucleotide sequences to the DDBJ. TXSearch utilizes the NCBI taxonomy database (15), and thus taxonomic accessions. ClustalW, based on the original ClustalW 2.1 package (16), is also available on one of the DDBJ services. The DDBJ’s ClustalW system contains original matrices developed at the National Institute of Genetics for genetics research. (iii) DDBJ Read Annotation Pipeline The DDBJ Read Annotation Pipeline (DDBJ Pipeline) is an NGS analytical system based on the NIG supercomputer (17). The DDBJ Pipeline began operation in 2009 and, since that time, >200 unique users worldwide have performed >4000 jobs using this system. In July 2012, the pipeline system was also migrated to the new NIG supercomputer. The functional enhancement of DDBJ Pipeline covers four points, which will be explained below. First, memory spaces for large genome de novo assembly were expanded up to 10 TB, which will be convenient for velvet users. Second, an RNA-seq de novo assembler was added. Third, mate-paired reads are supported for file upload. And finally, multiple query sets are now supported because the job number limitation for single users was abolished. This allows, for example, 20 DRA RUN files to be concurrently managed for data analysis.

FUTURE DIRECTION

As for software services, a beta version of the new sequence registration system has been tested, and we plan to develop an integration portal for new DDBJ registrations and other tools. Further development of cross search features for all DDBJ databases and support for large-scale NGS analytical systems are also crucial tasks. As for DDBJ services, the data scale in several search tools, and the Pipeline system itself, will be enlarged in near future.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

More information is available on the DDBJ website at http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp. News is delivered by really simple syndication (RSS), Twitter and mail magazines.

FUNDING

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT) via a management expense grant for Inter-University Research Institute Corporation to the DDBJ; Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Genome Science) to the DDBJ, SRA and DDBJ Pipeline (partial). Funding for open access charge: MEXT management expense grant to the DDBJ. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
  13 in total

1.  Evidence standards in experimental and inferential INSDC Third Party Annotation data.

Authors:  Guy Cochrane; Kirsty Bates; Rolf Apweiler; Yoshio Tateno; Jun Mashima; Takehide Kosuge; Ilene Karsch Mizrachi; Susan Schafer; Michael Fetchko
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.

Authors:  S F Altschul; T L Madden; A A Schäffer; J Zhang; Z Zhang; W Miller; D J Lipman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.

Authors:  J D Thompson; D G Higgins; T J Gibson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications.

Authors:  Pelin Yilmaz; Renzo Kottmann; Dawn Field; Rob Knight; James R Cole; Linda Amaral-Zettler; Jack A Gilbert; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; Anjanette Johnston; Guy Cochrane; Robert Vaughan; Christopher Hunter; Joonhong Park; Norman Morrison; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Peter Sterk; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Mark Bailey; Laura Baumgartner; Bruce W Birren; Martin J Blaser; Vivien Bonazzi; Tim Booth; Peer Bork; Frederic D Bushman; Pier Luigi Buttigieg; Patrick S G Chain; Emily Charlson; Elizabeth K Costello; Heather Huot-Creasy; Peter Dawyndt; Todd DeSantis; Noah Fierer; Jed A Fuhrman; Rachel E Gallery; Dirk Gevers; Richard A Gibbs; Inigo San Gil; Antonio Gonzalez; Jeffrey I Gordon; Robert Guralnick; Wolfgang Hankeln; Sarah Highlander; Philip Hugenholtz; Janet Jansson; Andrew L Kau; Scott T Kelley; Jerry Kennedy; Dan Knights; Omry Koren; Justin Kuczynski; Nikos Kyrpides; Robert Larsen; Christian L Lauber; Teresa Legg; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Wolfgang Ludwig; Donna Lyons; Eamonn Maguire; Barbara A Methé; Folker Meyer; Brian Muegge; Sara Nakielny; Karen E Nelson; Diana Nemergut; Josh D Neufeld; Lindsay K Newbold; Anna E Oliver; Norman R Pace; Giriprakash Palanisamy; Jörg Peplies; Joseph Petrosino; Lita Proctor; Elmar Pruesse; Christian Quast; Jeroen Raes; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Jacques Ravel; David A Relman; Susanna Assunta-Sansone; Patrick D Schloss; Lynn Schriml; Rohini Sinha; Michelle I Smith; Erica Sodergren; Aymé Spo; Jesse Stombaugh; James M Tiedje; Doyle V Ward; George M Weinstock; Doug Wendel; Owen White; Andrew Whiteley; Andreas Wilke; Jennifer R Wortman; Tanya Yatsunenko; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  DDBJ progress report.

Authors:  Eli Kaminuma; Takehide Kosuge; Yuichi Kodama; Hideo Aono; Jun Mashima; Takashi Gojobori; Hideaki Sugawara; Osamu Ogasawara; Toshihisa Takagi; Kousaku Okubo; Yasukazu Nakamura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The DNA Data Bank of Japan launches a new resource, the DDBJ Omics Archive of functional genomics experiments.

Authors:  Yuichi Kodama; Jun Mashima; Eli Kaminuma; Takashi Gojobori; Osamu Ogasawara; Toshihisa Takagi; Kousaku Okubo; Yasukazu Nakamura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The BioSample Database (BioSD) at the European Bioinformatics Institute.

Authors:  Mikhail Gostev; Adam Faulconbridge; Marco Brandizi; Julio Fernandez-Banet; Ugis Sarkans; Alvis Brazma; Helen Parkinson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The Sequence Read Archive: explosive growth of sequencing data.

Authors:  Yuichi Kodama; Martin Shumway; Rasko Leinonen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration.

Authors:  Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; Yasukazu Nakamura; Guy Cochrane
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Major submissions tool developments at the European Nucleotide Archive.

Authors:  Clara Amid; Ewan Birney; Lawrence Bower; Ana Cerdeño-Tárraga; Ying Cheng; Iain Cleland; Nadeem Faruque; Richard Gibson; Neil Goodgame; Christopher Hunter; Mikyung Jang; Rasko Leinonen; Xin Liu; Arnaud Oisel; Nima Pakseresht; Sheila Plaister; Rajesh Radhakrishnan; Kethi Reddy; Stephane Rivière; Marc Rossello; Alexander Senf; Dimitriy Smirnov; Petra Ten Hoopen; Daniel Vaughan; Robert Vaughan; Vadim Zalunin; Guy Cochrane
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  20 in total

1.  Draft Genome Sequence of the Archiascomycetous Yeast Saitoella complicata.

Authors:  Kenta Yamauchi; Shinji Kondo; Makiko Hamamoto; Yurika Takahashi; Yoshitoshi Ogura; Tetsuya Hayashi; Hiromi Nishida
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-05-28

2.  BioDB extractor: customized data extraction system for commonly used bioinformatics databases.

Authors:  Rajiv Karbhal; Sangeeta Sawant; Urmila Kulkarni-Kale
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.522

3.  GeneProf data: a resource of curated, integrated and reusable high-throughput genomics experiments.

Authors:  Florian Halbritter; Anastasia I Kousa; Simon R Tomlinson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  BioHackathon series in 2011 and 2012: penetration of ontology and linked data in life science domains.

Authors:  Toshiaki Katayama; Mark D Wilkinson; Kiyoko F Aoki-Kinoshita; Shuichi Kawashima; Yasunori Yamamoto; Atsuko Yamaguchi; Shinobu Okamoto; Shin Kawano; Jin-Dong Kim; Yue Wang; Hongyan Wu; Yoshinobu Kano; Hiromasa Ono; Hidemasa Bono; Simon Kocbek; Jan Aerts; Yukie Akune; Erick Antezana; Kazuharu Arakawa; Bruno Aranda; Joachim Baran; Jerven Bolleman; Raoul Jp Bonnal; Pier Luigi Buttigieg; Matthew P Campbell; Yi-An Chen; Hirokazu Chiba; Peter Ja Cock; K Bretonnel Cohen; Alexandru Constantin; Geraint Duck; Michel Dumontier; Takatomo Fujisawa; Toyofumi Fujiwara; Naohisa Goto; Robert Hoehndorf; Yoshinobu Igarashi; Hidetoshi Itaya; Maori Ito; Wataru Iwasaki; Matúš Kalaš; Takeo Katoda; Taehong Kim; Anna Kokubu; Yusuke Komiyama; Masaaki Kotera; Camille Laibe; Hilmar Lapp; Thomas Lütteke; M Scott Marshall; Takaaki Mori; Hiroshi Mori; Mizuki Morita; Katsuhiko Murakami; Mitsuteru Nakao; Hisashi Narimatsu; Hiroyo Nishide; Yosuke Nishimura; Johan Nystrom-Persson; Soichi Ogishima; Yasunobu Okamura; Shujiro Okuda; Kazuki Oshita; Nicki H Packer; Pjotr Prins; Rene Ranzinger; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Susanna Sansone; Hiromichi Sawaki; Sung-Ho Shin; Andrea Splendiani; Francesco Strozzi; Shu Tadaka; Philip Toukach; Ikuo Uchiyama; Masahito Umezaki; Rutger Vos; Patricia L Whetzel; Issaku Yamada; Chisato Yamasaki; Riu Yamashita; William S York; Christian M Zmasek; Shoko Kawamoto; Toshihisa Takagi
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2014-02-05

5.  The DDBJ Japanese Genotype-phenotype Archive for genetic and phenotypic human data.

Authors:  Yuichi Kodama; Jun Mashima; Takehide Kosuge; Toshiaki Katayama; Takatomo Fujisawa; Eli Kaminuma; Osamu Ogasawara; Kousaku Okubo; Toshihisa Takagi; Yasukazu Nakamura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The 2013 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue and the online molecular biology database collection.

Authors:  Xosé M Fernández-Suárez; Michael Y Galperin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  DDBJ progress report: a new submission system for leading to a correct annotation.

Authors:  Takehide Kosuge; Jun Mashima; Yuichi Kodama; Takatomo Fujisawa; Eli Kaminuma; Osamu Ogasawara; Kousaku Okubo; Toshihisa Takagi; Yasukazu Nakamura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  GenBank.

Authors:  Dennis A Benson; Karen Clark; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; David J Lipman; James Ostell; Eric W Sayers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Assembly information services in the European Nucleotide Archive.

Authors:  Nima Pakseresht; Blaise Alako; Clara Amid; Ana Cerdeño-Tárraga; Iain Cleland; Richard Gibson; Neil Goodgame; Tamer Gur; Mikyung Jang; Simon Kay; Rasko Leinonen; Weizhong Li; Xin Liu; Rodrigo Lopez; Hamish McWilliam; Arnaud Oisel; Swapna Pallreddy; Sheila Plaister; Rajesh Radhakrishnan; Stephane Rivière; Marc Rossello; Alexander Senf; Nicole Silvester; Dmitriy Smirnov; Silvano Squizzato; Petra ten Hoopen; Ana Luisa Toribio; Daniel Vaughan; Vadim Zalunin; Guy Cochrane
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  ATTED-II in 2016: A Plant Coexpression Database Towards Lineage-Specific Coexpression.

Authors:  Yuichi Aoki; Yasunobu Okamura; Shu Tadaka; Kengo Kinoshita; Takeshi Obayashi
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.