Literature DB >> 23180659

Fertility, parental investment, and the early adoption of modern contraception in rural Ethiopia.

Alexandra Alvergne1, David W Lawson, Parry M R Clarke, Eshetu Gurmu, Ruth Mace.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: What triggers initial shifts to fertility limitation as populations undergo socioeconomic development remains poorly understood. Alternative models emphasize the social contagion of low fertility ideals, or the individual perception of economic and/or fitness benefits to fertility limitation. Few micro-level studies in communities experiencing the earliest stages of the demographic transition are available. In a previous study, we found little support for the role of social transmission through friendships and spatial networks in explaining contraceptive uptake in rural Ethiopia, where contraceptive prevalence is low (<20%). Here, using data from the same population, we investigate the possibility that early contraceptive uptake is best understood as a manipulation of parental investment in response to local environmental change.
METHODS: We used data on >800 women which recorded fertility, birth spacing and offspring survivorship. We first investigated whether ever-users and non-users differ in their reproductive behavior and success prior to contraception use. We then conducted a within-women analysis to investigate the impact of contraceptive uptake on reproduction and child survivorship.
RESULTS: Women who have experienced higher fertility and higher child survival adopt modern contraception sooner rather than later, and contraceptive use among early adopters is predictive of greater birth spacing. However, contraceptive uptake does not have an impact on offspring survivorship.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide support for the idea that preferences for low fertility emerge in response to increasing competition between offspring. The study has implications for our understanding of the emergence of local fertility norms and the spread of modern birth control.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23180659     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  12 in total

Review 1.  Understanding variation in human fertility: what can we learn from evolutionary demography?

Authors:  Rebecca Sear; David W Lawson; Hillard Kaplan; Mary K Shenk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Fertility and Life Satisfaction in Rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Pierluigi Conzo; Giulia Fuochi; Letizia Mencarini
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2017-08

3.  Does Kin-Selection Theory Help to Explain Support Networks among Farmers in South-Central Ethiopia?

Authors:  Lucie Clech; Ashley Hazel; Mhairi A Gibson
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2019-12

4.  Does Sexual Conflict between Mother and Father Lead to Fertility Decline? : A Questionnaire Survey in a Modern Developed Society.

Authors:  Masahito Morita; Hisashi Ohtsuki; Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-06

5.  Pathways from education to fertility decline: a multi-site comparative study.

Authors:  Kristin Snopkowski; Mary C Towner; Mary K Shenk; Heidi Colleran
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Social network- and community-level influences on contraceptive use: evidence from rural Poland.

Authors:  Heidi Colleran; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Scaling-up access to family planning may improve linear growth and child development in low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Günther Fink; Christopher R Sudfeld; Goodarz Danaei; Majid Ezzati; Wafaie W Fawzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The offspring quantity-quality trade-off and human fertility variation.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  The cultural evolution of fertility decline.

Authors:  Heidi Colleran
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The Reproductive Ecology of Industrial Societies, Part I : Why Measuring Fertility Matters.

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Rebecca Sear; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.