Literature DB >> 23180381

The relevance of Heidegger's philosophy of technology for biomedical ethics.

Fredrik Svenaeus1.   

Abstract

Heidegger's thoughts on modern technology have received much attention in many disciplines and fields, but, with a few exceptions, the influence has been sparse in biomedical ethics. The reason for this might be that Heidegger's position has been misinterpreted as being generally hostile towards modern science and technology, and the fact that Heidegger himself never subjected medical technologies to scrutiny but was concerned rather with industrial technology and information technology. In this paper, Heidegger's philosophy of modern technology is introduced and then brought to bear on medical technology. Its main relevance for biomedical ethics is found to be that the field needs to focus upon epistemological and ontological questions in the philosophy of medicine related to the structure and goal of medical practice. Heidegger's philosophy can help us to see how the scientific attitude in medicine must always be balanced by and integrated into a phenomenological way of understanding the life-world concerns of patients. The difference between the scientific and the phenomenological method in medicine is articulated by Heidegger as two different ways of studying the human body: as biological organism and as lived body. Medicine needs to acknowledge the priority of the lived body in addressing health as a way of being-in-the-world and not as the absence of disease only. A critical development of Heidegger's position can provide us with a criterion for distinguishing the uses of medical technologies that are compatible with such an endeavor from the technological projects that are not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23180381     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-012-9240-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  9 in total

Review 1.  The finitude of nature: rethinking the ethics of biotechnology.

Authors:  H A Fielding
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Prescriptions: autonomy, humanism and the purpose of health technology.

Authors:  E L Krakauer
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-12

3.  Illness as unhomelike being-in-the-world: Heidegger and the phenomenology of medicine.

Authors:  Fredrik Svenaeus
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-08

4.  Emerging medical technologies and emerging conceptions of health.

Authors:  William E Stempsey
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006-08-22

5.  On Heidegger, medicine, and the modernity of modern medical technology.

Authors:  Iain Brassington
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006-11-01

Review 6.  A Heideggerian defense of therapeutic cloning.

Authors:  Fredrik Svenaeus
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007-02-28

7.  Analysing our qualms about "designing" future persons: autonomy, freedom of choice, and interfering with nature.

Authors:  Erik Malmqvist
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-02-20

8.  Do antidepressants affect the self? A phenomenological approach.

Authors:  Fredrik Svenaeus
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-05-03

9.  Beleaguered by technology: care in technologically intense environments.

Authors:  Sofia Almerud; Richard J Alapack; Bengt Fridlund; Margaretha Ekebergh
Journal:  Nurs Philos       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.279

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Phenomenology of pregnancy and the ethics of abortion.

Authors:  Fredrik Svenaeus
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.