Yu Chen1, Xinwei Wang, Deyu Chen, Xiaowei Liu. 1. Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, 200003, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cervical unilateral facet dislocation (UFD) in the younger children (0-10 years old) has rarely been reported in the literature and most surgeons have no experience for this kind of injury. Here, we reported a rare case of cervical UFD in a 22-month-old girl. METHODS: Clinical and radiological findings of this patient were described. Because closed reduction failed, operative reduction and fixation was performed using titanium miniplates. We also reviewed the related literature. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in neurological function during the follow-up period, and no complications developed. To our knowledge, the only similar case reported in the literature was a 9-year-old boy, who was successfully treated by closed reduction and immobilized with a rigid cervical collar. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical UFD in young children is definitely a great challenge, and each patient requires individual treatment. Closed reduction along with rigid immobilization is the first choice at the early stage, and operative treatment is indicated for cases that involved neurological deterioration, demonstrated recurrence,significant instability and failed closed reduction. However, long-term results and complications of surgical treatment in the pediatric population are worrisome.
PURPOSE: Cervical unilateral facet dislocation (UFD) in the younger children (0-10 years old) has rarely been reported in the literature and most surgeons have no experience for this kind of injury. Here, we reported a rare case of cervical UFD in a 22-month-old girl. METHODS: Clinical and radiological findings of this patient were described. Because closed reduction failed, operative reduction and fixation was performed using titanium miniplates. We also reviewed the related literature. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in neurological function during the follow-up period, and no complications developed. To our knowledge, the only similar case reported in the literature was a 9-year-old boy, who was successfully treated by closed reduction and immobilized with a rigid cervical collar. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical UFD in young children is definitely a great challenge, and each patient requires individual treatment. Closed reduction along with rigid immobilization is the first choice at the early stage, and operative treatment is indicated for cases that involved neurological deterioration, demonstrated recurrence,significant instability and failed closed reduction. However, long-term results and complications of surgical treatment in the pediatric population are worrisome.
Authors: Marcel F Dvorak; Charles G Fisher; Bizhan Aarabi; Mitchel B Harris; R John Hurbert; Y Raja Rampersaud; Alex Vaccaro; James S Harrop; Russ P Nockels; Ignacio N Madrazo; David Schwartz; Brian K Kwon; Yinshan Zhao; Michael G Fehlings Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Brian K Kwon; Charles G Fisher; Michael C Boyd; John Cobb; Hilary Jebson; Vanessa Noonan; Peter Wing; Marcel F Dvorak Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2007-07
Authors: Jonathan N Sellin; Kashif Shaikh; Sheila L Ryan; Alison Brayton; Daniel H Fulkerson; Andrew Jea Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 1.475