RATIONALE: Clozapine levels are advocated in the monitoring of patients on this drug and have now been used for a number of years. A safety-related threshold has also been proposed, as well as therapeutic lower and upper thresholds. While there has been reasonable consensus regarding a lower therapeutic threshold, this is not the case for the upper thresholds. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to review available evidence related to upper thresholds. METHODS: We carried out an electronic search of different databases and a manual search of articles between 1960 and 2011, cross-referencing the following terms with clozapine-interactions, monitoring, pharmacokinetics, plasma levels, serum levels, and toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty-nine articles met our search criteria and these could be divided into reviews (11), studies (24), and case reports (35). Study quality was evaluated, and none met criteria for a prospective, randomized controlled trial specifically addressing higher plasma levels, e.g., >500 ng/ml. Case reports emphasize in particular the impact of interactions, e.g., antidepressants and smoking. There is clear evidence indicating a dose-related increased risk of seizures, at least to 500-600 mg/day, but a lack of data to suggest such a relationship between plasma levels, dose, and side effects linked to safety, e.g., seizures, myocarditis, and agranulocytosis. The very limited evidence addressing an upper threshold related to clinical response suggests a "ceiling effect" in the range of 600-838 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the current safety-related threshold is not supported by evidence. There may be an upper threshold for clinical response, beyond which chance of response falls off, although further studies are warranted.
RATIONALE: Clozapine levels are advocated in the monitoring of patients on this drug and have now been used for a number of years. A safety-related threshold has also been proposed, as well as therapeutic lower and upper thresholds. While there has been reasonable consensus regarding a lower therapeutic threshold, this is not the case for the upper thresholds. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to review available evidence related to upper thresholds. METHODS: We carried out an electronic search of different databases and a manual search of articles between 1960 and 2011, cross-referencing the following terms with clozapine-interactions, monitoring, pharmacokinetics, plasma levels, serum levels, and toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty-nine articles met our search criteria and these could be divided into reviews (11), studies (24), and case reports (35). Study quality was evaluated, and none met criteria for a prospective, randomized controlled trial specifically addressing higher plasma levels, e.g., >500 ng/ml. Case reports emphasize in particular the impact of interactions, e.g., antidepressants and smoking. There is clear evidence indicating a dose-related increased risk of seizures, at least to 500-600 mg/day, but a lack of data to suggest such a relationship between plasma levels, dose, and side effects linked to safety, e.g., seizures, myocarditis, and agranulocytosis. The very limited evidence addressing an upper threshold related to clinical response suggests a "ceiling effect" in the range of 600-838 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the current safety-related threshold is not supported by evidence. There may be an upper threshold for clinical response, beyond which chance of response falls off, although further studies are warranted.
Authors: Lone Petersen; Anne Thorup; Johan Øqhlenschlaeger; Torben Øqstergaard Christensen; Pia Jeppesen; Gertrud Krarup; Per Jørrgensen; Erik Lykke Mortensen; Merete Nordentoft Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: M H Kronig; R A Munne; S Szymanski; A Z Safferman; S Pollack; T Cooper; J M Kane; J A Lieberman Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Madeleine S A Tan; Faraz Honarparvar; James R Falconer; Harendra S Parekh; Preeti Pandey; Dan J Siskind Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: C U Correll; Ofer Agid; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Andrea de Bartolomeis; Andrea Fagiolini; Niko Seppälä; Oliver D Howes Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 6.497
Authors: Oliver D Howes; Rob McCutcheon; Ofer Agid; Andrea de Bartolomeis; Nico J M van Beveren; Michael L Birnbaum; Michael A P Bloomfield; Rodrigo A Bressan; Robert W Buchanan; William T Carpenter; David J Castle; Leslie Citrome; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Michael Davidson; Richard J Drake; Serdar Dursun; Bjørn H Ebdrup; Helio Elkis; Peter Falkai; W Wolfgang Fleischacker; Ary Gadelha; Fiona Gaughran; Birte Y Glenthøj; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Jaime E C Hallak; William G Honer; James Kennedy; Bruce J Kinon; Stephen M Lawrie; Jimmy Lee; F Markus Leweke; James H MacCabe; Carolyn B McNabb; Herbert Meltzer; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Shinchiro Nakajima; Christos Pantelis; Tiago Reis Marques; Gary Remington; Susan L Rossell; Bruce R Russell; Cynthia O Siu; Takefumi Suzuki; Iris E Sommer; David Taylor; Neil Thomas; Alp Üçok; Daniel Umbricht; James T R Walters; John Kane; Christoph U Correll Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Susanna Every-Palmer; Mike Nowitz; James Stanley; Eve Grant; Mark Huthwaite; Helen Dunn; Pete M Ellis Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 8.143