BACKGROUND: Over the course of the past two decades autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has become an important surgical technique for treating large cartilage defects. The original method using a periostal flap has been improved by using cell-seeded scaffolds for implantation, the matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (mb-ACI) procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Uniform nationwide guidelines for post-ACI rehabilitation do not exist. A survey was conducted among the members of the clinical tissue regeneration study group concerning the current rehabilitation protocols and the members of the study group published recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation and treatment after ACI based on the results of this survey. RESULTS: There was agreement on fundamentals concerning a location-specific rehabilitation protocol (femoral condyle vs. patellofemoral joint). With regard to weight bearing and range of motion a variety of different protocols exist. Similar to this total agreement on the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for postsurgical care was found but again a great variety of different protocols exist. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript summarizes the recommendations of the members of the German clinical tissue regeneration study group on postsurgical rehabilitation and MRI assessment after ACI (level IVb/EBM).
BACKGROUND: Over the course of the past two decades autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has become an important surgical technique for treating large cartilage defects. The original method using a periostal flap has been improved by using cell-seeded scaffolds for implantation, the matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (mb-ACI) procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Uniform nationwide guidelines for post-ACI rehabilitation do not exist. A survey was conducted among the members of the clinical tissue regeneration study group concerning the current rehabilitation protocols and the members of the study group published recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation and treatment after ACI based on the results of this survey. RESULTS: There was agreement on fundamentals concerning a location-specific rehabilitation protocol (femoral condyle vs. patellofemoral joint). With regard to weight bearing and range of motion a variety of different protocols exist. Similar to this total agreement on the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for postsurgical care was found but again a great variety of different protocols exist. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript summarizes the recommendations of the members of the German clinical tissue regeneration study group on postsurgical rehabilitation and MRI assessment after ACI (level IVb/EBM).
Authors: Peter Cornelius Kreuz; Matthias Steinwachs; Christoph Erggelet; Andreas Lahm; Stefanie Krause; Christian Ossendorf; Dirk Meier; Nadir Ghanem; Markus Uhl Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Karen Hambly; Vladimir Bobic; Barbara Wondrasch; Dieter Van Assche; Stefan Marlovits Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2006-01-25 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Stefan Marlovits; Tallal Charles Mamisch; György Vekszler; Christoph Resinger; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Injury Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Gian M Salzmann; Philipp Niemeyer; Stephan Vogt; Peter Kreuz; Markus Arnold; Jürgen Fritz; Ayeesha Mujeeb; Ralf Rosenberger; Matthias Steinwachs; Peter Angele Journal: Springerplus Date: 2015-11-08