Literature DB >> 23179206

Cardio-respiratory and electromyographic responses to ergometer and on-water rowing in elite rowers.

I Bazzucchi1, P Sbriccoli, A Nicolò, A Passerini, F Quinzi, F Felici, M Sacchetti.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare muscle activation and cardio-respiratory response during ergometer and on-water rowing. Nine internationally competitive rowers (five Olympic Games medal winners, age 25.6 ± 4.8 years) were requested to perform a 1,000 m race simulation test in the two conditions. Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals from trapezius superior (TRS), latissimus dorsi (LD), biceps brachii (BB), rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VAM), vastus lateralis (VAL), biceps femoris (BF) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles were recorded continuously during the tests together with other cardio-respiratory parameters: heart rate (HR), ventilation (VE), oxygen consumption (VO₂). On-water, subjects covered the same distance in a longer time (218.4 ± 3.8 s vs. 178.1 ± 5.6 s during ergometer test). TRS, LD, BB, RF, VAM and VAL muscle activation on-water was lower than off-water during the rowing race. VO₂ and VE responses were similar between the two conditions even if the time to complete the 1,000 m race simulation test was higher on-water. The results indicate that for most of the analyzed muscles EMG activation on the ergometer is higher than on-water with the maximal activity at the beginning of the on-water test due reasonably to overcome the forces opposing the forward motion, while the ergometer task elicited increasing muscle activation over time. The present data may be considered by coaches when choosing a rowing ergometer in substitution for the training on-water or when relying on the indoor tests to select the crew.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23179206     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2550-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  20 in total

1.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures.

Authors:  H J Hermens; B Freriks; C Disselhorst-Klug; G Rau
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Energy systems contributions in 2,000 m race simulation: a comparison among rowing ergometers and water.

Authors:  Fernando de Campos Mello; Rômulo Cássio de Moraes Bertuzzi; Patricia Moreno Grangeiro; Emerson Franchini
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effect of power output on muscle coordination during rowing.

Authors:  Nicolas A Turpin; Arnaud Guével; Sylvain Durand; François Hug
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Differences in muscle activation between submaximal and maximal 6-minute rowing tests.

Authors:  Mitja Gerževič; Vojko Strojnik; Tomaž Jarm
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  A kinematic comparison of ergometer and on-water rowing.

Authors:  D H Lamb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Responses to arm and leg ergometry.

Authors:  R G Eston; D A Brodie
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Physiological responses to standardised arm work.

Authors:  C T Davies; A J Sargeant
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The impact of ergometer design on hip and trunk muscle activity patterns in elite rowers: an electromyographic assessment.

Authors:  Alex V Nowicky; Sara Horne; Richard Burdett
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  A comparison of rowing technique at different stroke rates: a description of sequencing, force production and kinematics.

Authors:  A H McGregor; A M J Bull; R Byng-Maddick
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  The Rowing Cycle: Sources of Variance and Invariance in Ergometer and On-the-Water Performance.

Authors:  R G Dawson; R J Lockwood; J D Wilson; G Freeman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  3 in total

1.  Maximal Fat Oxidation: Comparison between Treadmill, Elliptical and Rowing Exercises.

Authors:  Michelle Filipovic; Stephanie Munten; Karl-Heinz Herzig; Dominique D Gagnon
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Impact of ischaemia-reperfusion cycles during ischaemic preconditioning on 2000-m rowing ergometer performance.

Authors:  Tiago Turnes; Rafael Alves de Aguiar; Rogério Santos de Oliveira Cruz; Amadeo Félix Salvador; Felipe Domingos Lisbôa; Kayo Leonardo Pereira; João Antônio Gesser Raimundo; Fabrizio Caputo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effect of Rowing Ergometer Compliance on Biomechanical and Physiological Indicators during Simulated 2,000-metre Race.

Authors:  Nejc Šarabon; Žiga Kozinc; Jan Babič; Goran Marković
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.