Literature DB >> 23179125

Charlson comorbidity indices and in-hospital deaths in patients with hip fractures.

Valentin Neuhaus1, John King, Michiel G Hageman, David C Ring.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and its modifications are comorbidity-based measures that predict mortality. It was developed for patients without trauma and inconsistently predicted mortality and adverse events in several previous studies of patients with trauma.
PURPOSE: We therefore (1) determined whether the three different CCIs were predictors for in-hospital deaths in patients with hip fractures, (2) verified if the CCI mortality prediction had changed with time, (3) evaluated other predictors of in-hospital death in patients with hip fractures, and (4) determined if the CCI has predicted in-hospital adverse events.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a nationwide probability sample survey, the National Hospital Discharge Survey. More than 6 million adult patients with hip fractures and their associated comorbidities were scored by the original 1987 CCI, the 1994 age-adjusted CCI, and the 2011 updated, reweighted CCI. The three mortality indices' predictive values and predictors of in-hospital adverse events were compared.
RESULTS: For patients with hip fractures, all three CCI variations predicted in-hospital mortality. The receiver operating curves (ROC) of the models were less than 0.68, but they improved when we used statistical models that included age, sex, concomitant injuries, and other comorbidities not contained in the CCI models (ROC > 0.74). The age-adjusted CCI accuracy was slightly better than the other two CCIs. Adverse events during hospital stays were associated with a higher CCI, pertrochanteric fracture (versus transcervical), abdominal, chest, or head trauma, atrial fibrillation, multiple fractures, female sex, and longer hospital stays; however, the accuracy of this model was poor (ROC = 0.65).
CONCLUSIONS: While all three CCI variations predicted in-hospital mortality in patients with hip fractures, other factors may be of value in patients with trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23179125      PMCID: PMC3613553          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2705-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  31 in total

1.  Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  J J W Roche; R T Wenn; O Sahota; C G Moran
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-18

2.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  Is the Charlson Comorbidity Index useful for predicting trauma outcomes?

Authors:  Belinda J Gabbe; Kirstine Magtengaard; Andrew P Hannaford; Peter A Cameron
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Predictive value of six risk scores for outcome after surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients.

Authors:  E Burgos; J I Gómez-Arnau; R Díez; L Muñoz; J Fernández-Guisasola; S Garcia del Valle
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 2.105

5.  Risk factors for respiratory failure following operative stabilization of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  Timothy P McHenry; Sohail K Mirza; JingJing Wang; Charles E Wade; Grant E O'Keefe; Andrew T Dailey; Martin A Schreiber; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Mortality in elderly injured patients: the role of comorbidities.

Authors:  Laura Camilloni; Sara Farchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Francesco Chini; Piero Borgia
Journal:  Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot       Date:  2008-03

7.  Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures.

Authors:  G S Keene; M J Parker; G A Pryor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-11-13

8.  Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D Teres; J Klar; J S Avrunin; S H Gehlbach; J Rapoport
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Charlson Index comorbidity adjustment for ischemic stroke outcome studies.

Authors:  Larry B Goldstein; Gregory P Samsa; David B Matchar; Ronnie D Horner
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Authors:  M Charlson; T P Szatrowski; J Peterson; J Gold
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  31 in total

1.  Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index Scores are associated with readmission after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy Voskuijl; Michiel Hageman; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In-hospital mortality after hip fracture by treatment setting.

Authors:  Katie J Sheehan; Boris Sobolev; Pierre Guy; Lisa Kuramoto; Suzanne N Morin; Jason M Sutherland; Lauren Beaupre; Donald Griesdale; Michael Dunbar; Eric Bohm; Edward Harvey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Valentin Neuhaus; C Niek van Dijk; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Sedation depth during spinal anesthesia and survival in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture repair.

Authors:  Charles H Brown; Andrew S Azman; Allan Gottschalk; Simon C Mears; Frederick E Sieber
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  In-Hospital Outcomes after Hemiarthroplasty versus Total Hip Arthroplasty for Isolated Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Timothy Voskuijl; Valentin Neuhaus; Ahmet Kinaci; Mark Vrahas; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

6.  Efficiently stratifying mid-term death risk in femoral fractures in the elderly: introducing the ASAgeCoGeCC Score.

Authors:  C Trevisan; G Gallinari; A Carbone; R Klumpp
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Inpatient mortality after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Valentin Neuhaus; David Ring
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The National Hospital Discharge Survey and Nationwide Inpatient Sample: the databases used affect results in THA research.

Authors:  Stijn Bekkers; Arjan G J Bot; Dennis Makarawung; Valentin Neuhaus; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  What are the factors influencing outcome among patients admitted to a hospital with a proximal humeral fracture?

Authors:  Valentin Neuhaus; Christiaan H J Swellengrebel; Jeroen K J Bossen; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comorbidity as the dominant predictor of mortality after hip fracture surgeries.

Authors:  Eric Wei Liang Cher; John Carson Allen; Tet Sen Howe; Joyce Suang Bee Koh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.