Literature DB >> 2317904

Decreased magnitude of heart rate spectral components in coronary artery disease. Its relation to angiographic severity.

J Hayano1, Y Sakakibara, M Yamada, N Ohte, T Fujinami, K Yokoyama, Y Watanabe, K Takata.   

Abstract

We analyzed the spectral components of RR interval variability under controlled respiration (15 breaths/min) in 56 patients (age range, 35-73 years) referred for coronary angiography; 14 patients had multivessel disease (group M), 21 had one-vessel disease (group S), and 21 had nonsignificant disease or normal coronary artery (group N). There were 43 healthy controls (age range, 36-71 years) (group C). The patients had no clinical evidence of heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or acute stage of infarction and had taken no medication for 3 days. The autoregressive power spectral density of RR interval variability contains two major components, respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) (0.25 Hz) and Mayer wave-like sinus arrhythmia (MWSA) (0.04-0.15 Hz), which have magnitudes that are quantitative markers of cardiac vagal activity and sympathetic activity with vagal modulation, respectively. We represented the magnitudes by the coefficient of component variance (CCV), which provided the amplitude relative to the mean RR interval. The age- and sex-adjusted mean of CCVRSA significantly decreased with advancing angiographic severity (1.64 +/- 0.09%, 1.66 +/- 0.12%, 1.22 +/- 0.13%, and 0.81 +/- 0.16% for groups C, N, S, and M, respectively) (p = 0.0001). The CCVRSA was unrelated to left ventricular function, previous myocardial infarction, or stenosis of any specific artery including the sinoatrial and atrioventricular node arteries. The CCVMWSA decreased only in group M (p = 0.0462). These results indicate that coronary artery disease is associated with vagal dominant impairment in autonomic cardiac function and that reduction in the vagal cardiac function correlates with the angiographic severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2317904     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  51 in total

1.  Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during positive pressure pneumoperitoneum: the significance of increased cardiac sympathetic expression.

Authors:  A Bickel; M Yahalom; N Roguin; R Frankel; J Breslava; S Ivry; A Eitan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The relationship between heart rate recovery and heart rate variability in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Harun Evrengul; Halil Tanriverdi; Sedat Kose; Basri Amasyali; Ayhan Kilic; Turgay Celik; Hasan Turhan
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Socioeconomic status and health: is parasympathetic nervous system activity an intervening mechanism?

Authors:  Richard P Sloan; Mei-Hua Huang; Stephen Sidney; Kiang Liu; O Dale Williams; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 4.  The polyvagal perspective.

Authors:  Stephen W Porges
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Circadian rhythm of the signal averaged electrocardiogram and its relation to heart rate variability in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Nakagawa; T Iwao; S Ishida; H Yonemochi; T Fujino; T Saikawa; M Ito
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Heart rate variability and sympathovagal balance: pharmacological validation.

Authors:  M Bootsma; C A Swenne; M J A Janssen; V Manger Cats; M J Schalij
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  CrossTalk proposal: Heart rate variability is a valid measure of cardiac autonomic responsiveness.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Katerina Hnatkova; Heikki V Huikuri; Federico Lombardi; Georg Schmidt; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The prevalence and diagnostic/prognostic utility of sinus arrhythmia in the evaluation of congenital long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan N Johnson; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Heart rate and heart rate variability as indirect markers of surgeons' intraoperative stress.

Authors:  Annika Rieger; Regina Stoll; Steffi Kreuzfeld; Kristin Behrens; Matthias Weippert
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Prognostic value of baroreflex sensitivity testing after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  T G Farrell; O Odemuyiwa; Y Bashir; T R Cripps; M Malik; D E Ward; A J Camm
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.