Literature DB >> 23178889

Fate of geothermal mercury from Yellowstone National Park in the Madison and Missouri Rivers, USA.

David A Nimick1, Rodney R Caldwell, Donald R Skaar, Trevor M Selch.   

Abstract

Mercury is a worldwide contaminant derived from natural and anthropogenic sources. River systems play a key role in the transport and fate of Hg because they drain widespread areas affected by aerial Hg deposition, transport Hg away from point sources, and are sites of Hg biogeochemical cycling and bioaccumulation. The Madison and Missouri Rivers provide a natural laboratory for studying the fate and transport of Hg contributed by geothermal discharge in Yellowstone National Park and from the atmosphere for a large drainage basin in Montana and Wyoming, United States of America (USA). Assessing Hg in these rivers also is important because they support fishery-based recreation and irrigated agriculture. During 2002 to 2006, Hg concentrations were measured in water, sediment, and fish from the main stem, 7 tributaries, and 6 lakes. Using these data, the geothermal Hg load to the Madison River and overall fate of Hg along 378 km of the Missouri River system were assessed. Geothermal Hg was the primary source of elevated total Hg concentrations in unfiltered water (6.2-31.2 ng/L), sediment (148-1100 ng/g), and brown and rainbow trout (0.12-1.23 μg total Hg/g wet weight skinless filet) upstream from Hebgen Lake (the uppermost impoundment). Approximately 7.0 kg/y of geothermal Hg was discharged from the park via the Madison River, and an estimated 87% of that load was lost to sedimentation in and volatilization from Hebgen Lake. Consequently, Hg concentrations in water, sediment, and fish from main-stem sites downstream from Hebgen Lake were not elevated and were comparable to concentrations reported for other areas affected solely by atmospheric Hg deposition. Some Hg was sequestered in sediment in the downstream lakes. Bioaccumulation of Hg in fish along the river system was strongly correlated (r(2)=0.76-0.86) with unfiltered total and methyl Hg concentrations in water and total Hg in sediment. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23178889     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Distribution and enrichment of mercury in Tibetan lake waters and their relations with the natural environment.

Authors:  Chengding Li; Qianggong Zhang; Shichang Kang; Yongqin Liu; Jie Huang; Xiaobo Liu; Junming Guo; Kang Wang; Zhiyuan Cong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A Quantitative Assessment and Biomagnification of Mercury and Its Associated Health Risks from Fish Consumption in Freshwater Lakes of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.

Authors:  Nikhat Hina; Rahat Riaz; Usman Ali; Uzaira Rafique; Riffat Naseem Malik
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Soil mercury levels in the area surrounding the Cerro Prieto geothermal complex, MEXICO.

Authors:  M A Pastrana-Corral; F T Wakida; E García-Flores; D D Rodriguez-Mendivil; A Quiñonez-Plaza; T D J Piñon-Colin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Mercury bioremoval by Yarrowia strains isolated from sediments of mercury-polluted estuarine water.

Authors:  Ganiyu Oladunjoye Oyetibo; Shakirat Titilayo Ishola; Wakako Ikeda-Ohtsubo; Keisuke Miyauchi; Matthew Olusoji Ilori; Ginro Endo
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Hg tolerance and biouptake of an isolated pigmentation yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa.

Authors:  Bing Liu; Chaogang Wang; Danxia Liu; Ning He; Xu Deng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.