Literature DB >> 23177487

A randomized comparison of platelet reactivity in patients after treatment with various commercial clopidogrel preparations: the CLO-CLO trial.

Markus Oberhänsli1, Cédric Lehner, Serban Puricel, Sonja Lehmann, Mario Togni, Jean-Christophe Stauffer, Gérard Baeriswyl, Jean-Jacques Goy, Stéphane Cook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The salt linked to the clopidogrel molecule in generic preparations is suspected to affect its clinical efficacy. There is a lack of information about inhibition of platelet reactivity by generic preparations. AIMS: To compare the effect of original clopidogrel (clopidogrel bisulphate [Plavix(®)]), generic clopidogrel preparations (clopidogrel hydrochloride [Clopidogrel-Mepha(®)]; clopidogrel besylate [Clopidogrel Sandoz(®)]) and prasugrel (Efient(®)) on platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease.
METHODS: Patients with coronary artery disease treated with stents received, in a random sequence, original clopidogrel bisulphate, clopidogrel hydrochloride and clopidogrel besylate. Platelet function was assessed with the Multiplate analyser after an initial loading dose (600 mg) and at day 10 after each treatment period. Prasugrel was given for another 10 days. An adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test value<46 antiaggregation units (U) was defined as therapeutic platelet inhibition.
RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 69 ± 10 years; 50 men) were randomized. Original clopidogrel bisulphate, clopidogrel hydrochloride and clopidogrel besylate provided similar inhibition of platelet reactivity with values of 31 ± 25, 33 ± 28 and 28 ± 23 U, respectively (P not significant). Prasugrel provided better inhibition of platelet function (10 ± 11 vs. 31 ± 25 U for clopidogrel bisulphate; P<0.001). An ADP test value>46 U was measured in 11 patients (18%) with clopidogrel bisulphate, 13 (22%) with clopidogrel besylate and 13 (22%) with clopidogrel hydrochloride compared with only one (2%) with prasugrel.
CONCLUSION: Generic clopidogrel preparations provided similar inhibition of platelet reactivity to original clopidogrel bisulphate, although prasugrel was more efficient.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23177487     DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2012.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1875-2128            Impact factor:   2.340


  3 in total

1.  Are Generic Drugs Used in Cardiology as Effective and Safe as their Brand-name Counterparts? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacinthe Leclerc; Magalie Thibault; Jennifer Midiani Gonella; Claudia Beaudoin; John Sampalis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Comparative fasting bioavailability of two clopidogrel formulations in healthy Mediterranean volunteers: an in vitro-in vivo correlation.

Authors:  Abdel Naser Zaid; Rowa' Al Ramahi; Rana Bustami; Ayman Mousa; Sewar Khasawneh
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 3.  Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Lamberto Manzoli; Maria Elena Flacco; Stefania Boccia; Elvira D'Andrea; Nikola Panic; Carolina Marzuillo; Roberta Siliquini; Walter Ricciardi; Paolo Villari; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 8.082

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.