Literature DB >> 23176966

Determinants of early and long-term efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis in proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Ylva Haig1, Tone Enden, Carl-Erik Slagsvold, Leiv Sandvik, Per Morten Sandset, Nils Einar Kløw.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) effectively enhances clot removal and recently has been shown to reduce the development of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). This study was performed to identify potential markers for early and long-term efficacy of CDT, adverse events, and their interrelationship.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18-75 years (mean, 54 y; 33 women) with first-time proximal DVT and symptoms up to 21 days were included in subanalyses in an open, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Early efficacy was assessed with a thrombus score based on daily venography. Six-month and 2-year follow-up included iliofemoral patency assessed with duplex ultrasound and air plethysmography, and PTS was assessed with the Villalta scale.
RESULTS: A mean clot resolution of 82%±25 was achieved in 92 patients. Successful lysis (ie,≥50%) was obtained in 83 patients. Early efficacy was equal for femoral and iliofemoral thrombus and not related to thrombus load before CDT, symptom duration, or predisposing risk factors. Lower thrombus score at completion of CDT was associated with increased patency at 24 months (P = .040), and increased patency after 6 and 24 months was correlated with reduced development of PTS after 24 months (P<.001). Bleeding complications were mainly related to the puncture site, and popliteal vein access led to fewer bleeding incidents.
CONCLUSIONS: Comp, this is a Clinical Study article, so, as noted on the TOC, the Conclusions section of the abstract gets listed on the TOC. CDT via popliteal access was safe, effectively removed clots, and restored iliofemoral patency. Preprocedure evaluation did not identify patients who did not benefit from treatment. Early efficacy and follow-up patency are of importance to reduce the risk for PTS.
Copyright © 2013 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23176966     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  14 in total

Review 1.  The case for catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Thita Chiasakul; Adam Cuker
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-07-24

2.  Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Anthony J Comerota; Clive Kearon; Chu-Shu Gu; Jim A Julian; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Susan R Kahn; Michael R Jaff; Mahmood K Razavi; Andrei L Kindzelski; Riyaz Bashir; Parag Patel; Mel Sharafuddin; Michael J Sichlau; Wael E Saad; Zakaria Assi; Lawrence V Hofmann; Margaret Kennedy; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Feasibility of low-dose infusion of alteplase for unsuccessful thrombolysis with urokinase in deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Maofeng Gong; Boxiang Zhao; Xu He; Jianping Gu; Guoping Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Correlation between Post-Procedure Residual Thrombus and Clinical Outcome in Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Receiving Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mahmood K Razavi; Amber Salter; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Samantha Lancia; Susan R Kahn; Ido Weinberg; Clive Kearon; Ezana M Azene; Nilesh H Patel; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 5.  Catheter-based therapies for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Mahmood K Razavi; Emmad Karmouta
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Lorna Watson; Cathryn Broderick; Matthew P Armon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-10

7.  Treatment of May-Thurner's Syndrome and Associated Complications: A Multicenter Experience.

Authors:  Priscilla Sigua-Arce; Ramy Mando; Lisa Spencer; Alexandra Halalau
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-08-20

8.  CT venography for deep venous thrombosis: can it predict catheter-directed thrombolysis prognosis in patients with iliac vein compression syndrome?

Authors:  Jin Woo Choi; Hwan Jun Jae; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Sang-Il Min; Seung-Kee Min; Whal Lee; Jin Wook Chung
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb.

Authors:  Cathryn Broderick; Lorna Watson; Matthew P Armon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-19

10.  Symptom burden and job absenteeism after treatment with additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Tone Enden; Nils-Einar Kløw; Per Morten Sandset
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2013-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.