Literature DB >> 2317684

Self protection in surgery: the use of double gloves.

R D Dodds1, S G Barker, N H Morgan, D R Donaldson, M H Thomas.   

Abstract

This study assesses the perforation rate of single and double gloves and thus the extent to which double gloving protects the surgeon from diseases transmissible from the patient. We have also investigated whether double gloving offers the patient extra protection by reducing wound sepsis. Two hundred adult hernia repairs were performed, the first 100 single gloved and the second 100 double gloved. Glove perforation rates were not significantly different between single gloves and the outer of the double gloves. Although 46 of 400 outer gloves were perforated there were only 15 inner glove perforations and only eight of these matched the outer perforations. The percentage of operations in which the latex protective barrier was breached was reduced from 31 per cent when the surgeon wore single gloves to 8 per cent with double gloves. Wound sepsis was not increased by glove perforation nor reduced by double gloving. While careful technique remains mandatory we conclude that double gloving offers increased protection to the surgeon operating on high risk infectious cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2317684     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800770228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

1.  Occult glove perforation during ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  L Apt; K M Miller
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1992

2.  Incidence of glove perforation during episiotomy repair.

Authors:  B Arena; N Maffulli; I Vocaturo; G Scognamiglio
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  How evidence-based are CAGS surgeons really?

Authors:  Chris de Gara
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Can surgical gloves be made thinner without increasing their liability to puncture?

Authors:  S Carter; S Choong; A Marino; D Sellu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Subjective effects of double gloves on surgical performance.

Authors:  S J Wilson; D Sellu; A Uy; M A Jaffer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Double gloving and surgical technique.

Authors:  J M Webb; B D Pentlow
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.

Authors:  J Tanner; H Parkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

8.  High rates of perforation are found in endovaginal ultrasound probe covers before and after oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  M Hignett; P Claman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Sheathing of the endovaginal ultrasound probe: is it adequate?

Authors:  R Jimenez; P Duff
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993

Review 10.  Comparison of Unnoticed Glove Perforations during Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sachit Anand; Zenon Pogorelić; Apoorv Singh; Carlos Martin Llorente Muñoz; Nellai Krishnan; Anjan Kumar Dhua; Prabudh Goel; Minu Bajpai
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.