Literature DB >> 23175746

Genome-wide characterization of nonreference transposons reveals evolutionary propensities of transposons in soybean.

Zhixi Tian1, Meixia Zhao, Maoyun She, Jianchang Du, Steven B Cannon, Xin Liu, Xun Xu, Xinpeng Qi, Man-Wah Li, Hon-Ming Lam, Jianxin Ma.   

Abstract

Preferential accumulation of transposable elements (TEs), particularly long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs), in recombination-suppressed pericentromeric regions seems to be a general pattern of TE distribution in flowering plants. However, whether such a pattern was formed primarily by preferential TE insertions into pericentromeric regions or by selection against TE insertions into euchromatin remains obscure. We recently investigated TE insertions in 31 resequenced wild and cultivated soybean (Glycine max) genomes and detected 34,154 unique nonreference TE insertions mappable to the reference genome. Our data revealed consistent distribution patterns of the nonreference LTR-RT insertions and those present in the reference genome, whereas the distribution patterns of the nonreference DNA TE insertions and the accumulated ones were significantly different. The densities of the nonreference LTR-RT insertions were found to negatively correlate with the rates of local genetic recombination, but no significant correlation between the densities of nonreference DNA TE insertions and the rates of local genetic recombination was detected. These observations suggest that distinct insertional preferences were primary factors that resulted in different levels of effectiveness of purifying selection, perhaps as an effect of local genomic features, such as recombination rates and gene densities that reshaped the distribution patterns of LTR-RTs and DNA TEs in soybean.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175746      PMCID: PMC3531843          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.112.103630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  43 in total

Review 1.  Plant retrotransposons.

Authors:  A Kumar; J L Bennetzen
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Transposons but not retrotransposons are located preferentially in regions of high recombination rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L Duret; G Marais; C Biémont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Recombination rate and the distribution of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Carène Rizzon; Gabriel Marais; Manolo Gouy; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genome-wide genetic changes during modern breeding of maize.

Authors:  Yinping Jiao; Hainan Zhao; Longhui Ren; Weibin Song; Biao Zeng; Jinjie Guo; Baobao Wang; Zhipeng Liu; Jing Chen; Wei Li; Mei Zhang; Shaojun Xie; Jinsheng Lai
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics.

Authors:  Patrick S Schnable; Doreen Ware; Robert S Fulton; Joshua C Stein; Fusheng Wei; Shiran Pasternak; Chengzhi Liang; Jianwei Zhang; Lucinda Fulton; Tina A Graves; Patrick Minx; Amy Denise Reily; Laura Courtney; Scott S Kruchowski; Chad Tomlinson; Cindy Strong; Kim Delehaunty; Catrina Fronick; Bill Courtney; Susan M Rock; Eddie Belter; Feiyu Du; Kyung Kim; Rachel M Abbott; Marc Cotton; Andy Levy; Pamela Marchetto; Kerri Ochoa; Stephanie M Jackson; Barbara Gillam; Weizu Chen; Le Yan; Jamey Higginbotham; Marco Cardenas; Jason Waligorski; Elizabeth Applebaum; Lindsey Phelps; Jason Falcone; Krishna Kanchi; Thynn Thane; Adam Scimone; Nay Thane; Jessica Henke; Tom Wang; Jessica Ruppert; Neha Shah; Kelsi Rotter; Jennifer Hodges; Elizabeth Ingenthron; Matt Cordes; Sara Kohlberg; Jennifer Sgro; Brandon Delgado; Kelly Mead; Asif Chinwalla; Shawn Leonard; Kevin Crouse; Kristi Collura; Dave Kudrna; Jennifer Currie; Ruifeng He; Angelina Angelova; Shanmugam Rajasekar; Teri Mueller; Rene Lomeli; Gabriel Scara; Ara Ko; Krista Delaney; Marina Wissotski; Georgina Lopez; David Campos; Michele Braidotti; Elizabeth Ashley; Wolfgang Golser; HyeRan Kim; Seunghee Lee; Jinke Lin; Zeljko Dujmic; Woojin Kim; Jayson Talag; Andrea Zuccolo; Chuanzhu Fan; Aswathy Sebastian; Melissa Kramer; Lori Spiegel; Lidia Nascimento; Theresa Zutavern; Beth Miller; Claude Ambroise; Stephanie Muller; Will Spooner; Apurva Narechania; Liya Ren; Sharon Wei; Sunita Kumari; Ben Faga; Michael J Levy; Linda McMahan; Peter Van Buren; Matthew W Vaughn; Kai Ying; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Scott J Emrich; Yi Jia; Ananth Kalyanaraman; An-Ping Hsia; W Brad Barbazuk; Regina S Baucom; Thomas P Brutnell; Nicholas C Carpita; Cristian Chaparro; Jer-Ming Chia; Jean-Marc Deragon; James C Estill; Yan Fu; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Yujun Han; Hyeran Lee; Pinghua Li; Damon R Lisch; Sanzhen Liu; Zhijie Liu; Dawn Holligan Nagel; Maureen C McCann; Phillip SanMiguel; Alan M Myers; Dan Nettleton; John Nguyen; Bryan W Penning; Lalit Ponnala; Kevin L Schneider; David C Schwartz; Anupma Sharma; Carol Soderlund; Nathan M Springer; Qi Sun; Hao Wang; Michael Waterman; Richard Westerman; Thomas K Wolfgruber; Lixing Yang; Yeisoo Yu; Lifang Zhang; Shiguo Zhou; Qihui Zhu; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; R Kelly Dawe; Jiming Jiang; Ning Jiang; Gernot G Presting; Susan R Wessler; Srinivas Aluru; Robert A Martienssen; Sandra W Clifton; W Richard McCombie; Rod A Wing; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Whole-genome resequencing allows detection of many rare LINE-1 insertion alleles in humans.

Authors:  Adam D Ewing; Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations.

Authors:  Jun Cao; Korbinian Schneeberger; Stephan Ossowski; Torsten Günther; Sebastian Bender; Joffrey Fitz; Daniel Koenig; Christa Lanz; Oliver Stegle; Christoph Lippert; Xi Wang; Felix Ott; Jonas Müller; Carlos Alonso-Blanco; Karsten Borgwardt; Karl J Schmid; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Pericentromeric effects shape the patterns of divergence, retention, and expression of duplicated genes in the paleopolyploid soybean.

Authors:  Jianchang Du; Zhixi Tian; Yi Sui; Meixia Zhao; Qijian Song; Steven B Cannon; Perry Cregan; Jianxin Ma
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Katrien M Devos; James K M Brown; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  25 in total

1.  Global dissection of alternative splicing in paleopolyploid soybean.

Authors:  Yanting Shen; Zhengkui Zhou; Zheng Wang; Weiyu Li; Chao Fang; Mian Wu; Yanming Ma; Tengfei Liu; Ling-An Kong; De-Liang Peng; Zhixi Tian
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Co-evolution of plant LTR-retrotransposons and their host genomes.

Authors:  Meixia Zhao; Jianxin Ma
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 14.870

3.  Patterns and Consequences of Subgenome Differentiation Provide Insights into the Nature of Paleopolyploidy in Plants.

Authors:  Meixia Zhao; Biao Zhang; Damon Lisch; Jianxin Ma
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Chromosomal distribution of soybean retrotransposon SORE-1 suggests its recent preferential insertion into euchromatic regions.

Authors:  Kenta Nakashima; Jun Abe; Akira Kanazawa
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 5.  Coevolution between transposable elements and recombination.

Authors:  Tyler V Kent; Jasmina Uzunović; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Mutation Load in Sunflower Inversions Is Negatively Correlated with Inversion Heterozygosity.

Authors:  Kaichi Huang; Kate L Ostevik; Cassandra Elphinstone; Marco Todesco; Natalia Bercovich; Gregory L Owens; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 8.800

Review 7.  Genetic basis and detection of unintended effects in genetically modified crop plants.

Authors:  Gregory S Ladics; Andrew Bartholomaeus; Phil Bregitzer; Nancy G Doerrer; Alan Gray; Thomas Holzhauser; Mark Jordan; Paul Keese; Esther Kok; Phil Macdonald; Wayne Parrott; Laura Privalle; Alan Raybould; Seung Yon Rhee; Elena Rice; Jörg Romeis; Justin Vaughn; Jean-Michel Wal; Kevin Glenn
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  The Wukong Terminal-Repeat Retrotransposon in Miniature (TRIM) Elements in Diverse Maize Germplasm.

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Xinxin Li; Tingzhang Wang; Joachim Messing; Jian-Hong Xu
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  The use of RelocaTE and unassembled short reads to produce high-resolution snapshots of transposable element generated diversity in rice.

Authors:  Sofia M C Robb; Lu Lu; Elizabeth Valencia; James M Burnette; Yutaka Okumoto; Susan R Wessler; Jason E Stajich
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  TARE1, a mutated Copia-like LTR retrotransposon followed by recent massive amplification in tomato.

Authors:  Hao Yin; Jing Liu; Yingxiu Xu; Xing Liu; Shaoling Zhang; Jianxin Ma; Jianchang Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.