Literature DB >> 23175502

Genetic induction of the Warburg effect inhibits tumor growth.

Federica Sotgia, Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn, Michael P Lisanti.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175502      PMCID: PMC3717788          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
Mitochondrial carriers are integral proteins of the inner membrane that allow for the exchange of metabolites, nucleotides, and cofactors between the cytosol and the mitochondria and thus, enact a variety of energetic adjustments [1,2]. The mitochondrial citrate carrier, SLC25A1 or CIC, catalyses the efflux of citrate from the mitochondrial matrix in exchange for cytosolic malate. Mitochondrial citrate is necessary for the Krebs cycle and oxidative phosphorylation (OXOPHOS), while cytosolic citrate provides the only carbon source for fatty acids and sterol biosynthesis. In addition, cytoplasmic citrate is an allosteric inhibitor of enzymes involved in glucose catabolism, particularly of phosphofructokinase (PFK), while at the same time providing a source for the production of NAD+ (via the action of citrate lyase and malate dehydrogenase), which can be used to support glycolysis. Because tumor cells display enhanced glycolytic capacity and enhanced rates of de novo lipogenesis, these activities would theoretically place CIC at a nodal point in the regulation of metabolic pathways and mitochondrial activity in cancer. In this issue of Oncotarget, Avantaggiati and colleagues [3] provide novel findings that suggest that inhibition of tumor growth brought about by either genetic or biochemical inhibition of CIC occurs through unanticipated and fundamentally important new mechanisms that affect both cellular metabolism and viability. The authors show that while the inhibition of CIC blunted de novo lipid synthesis as expected, CIC inhibition also resulted in destabilization of the mitochondrial membrane potential, enhanced ROS (reactive oxygen species) production and increased production of L-lactate, indicative of a re-wiring of metabolism towards glycolysis. The major implications of their findings is that a key component of CIC's ability to support proliferation of tumor cells might be in fact be the preservation of mitochondrial pathways of energy production while limiting the glycolytic addiction of tumor cells, essentially suppressing the Warburg effect, a metabolic trait that is proposed to promote malignancy. In addition, the authors provide compelling new evidence that CIC inhibition results in mitochondrial depletion and degradation via autophagy. In support of these data, blocking of autophagy rescues the anti-proliferative effects due to CIC loss both in tumor cells and in the model organism Zebrafish. These studies describe a previously unknown role for CIC in regulating mitochondrial homeostasis and autophagy/mitophagy and are important and provocative for several reasons. The Warburg theory proposes that the mitochondria of cancer cells are unable to provide energy via oxidative phosphorylation, and therefore rely upon glycolysis for energy production [4]. This view has been embraced in light of the fact that many oncogenic pathways and proteins, including Myc and Ras re-program the metabolism of cancer cells towards the glycolytic addiction, while inhibiting the expression of genes that promote mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXOPH). Conversely, various tumor suppressors including p53, inhibit glycolysis and promote mitochondrial respiration. These opposing activities support the view that an important metabolic trait of tumor cells is enhanced glycolysis and decreased mitochondrial respiratory capacity. However, numerous lines of evidence fully support the existence of a much more complex interplay between the metabolism of glucose and mitochondrial activity, which is dependent upon the region of the tumor, -whether hypoxic or non-hypoxic- as well as the tumor microenvironment. For example, recent studies have provided for a model whereby hypoxic cancer cells convert glucose to lactate leading to its extracellular accumulation, where aerobic non-hypoxic cancer cells up-take it via monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) and utilize it for oxidative phosphorylation [5]. In the newly proposed “Two-Compartment Tumor Metabolism” model and the “Reverse Warburg Effect”, ROS produced by the tumor cells, activates autophagy and leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and glycolysis in cancer associated fibroblasts, which in turn results in the production of recycled nutrients, including L-lactate and ketone bodies, that drive the anabolic growth of tumors [6-9]. This feedback loop was shown to produce autophagy resistance and oxidative mitochondrial metabolism (OXPHOS) in cancer cells. Thus, in this model of metabolic-coupling, the oxidative capacity of the tumor mitochondria and the concomitant bypassing of autophagy both act in concert to support cancer growth. Therefore, it is not unlikely that CIC is also involved in the positive-feedback and crosstalk provided by the stroma. It will be important to determine whether CIC impinges upon other tumor-promoting metabolic branches, particularly the catabolism of glutamine.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial metabolite transport.

Authors:  Ferdinando Palmieri; Ciro Leonardo Pierri
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.000

2.  Energy transfer in "parasitic" cancer metabolism: mitochondria are the powerhouse and Achilles' heel of tumor cells.

Authors:  Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Richard G Pestell; Anthony Howell; Mark L Tykocinski; Fnu Nagajyothi; Fabiana S Machado; Herbert B Tanowitz; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Mitochondrial and Plasma Membrane Citrate Transporters: Discovery of Selective Inhibitors and Application to Structure/Function Analysis.

Authors:  Jiakang Sun; Sreevidya Aluvila; Rusudan Kotaria; June A Mayor; D Eric Walters; Ronald S Kaplan
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Otto Warburg's contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism.

Authors:  Willem H Koppenol; Patricia L Bounds; Chi V Dang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Power surge: supporting cells "fuel" cancer cell mitochondria.

Authors:  Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 27.287

6.  Targeting lactate-fueled respiration selectively kills hypoxic tumor cells in mice.

Authors:  Pierre Sonveaux; Frédérique Végran; Thies Schroeder; Melanie C Wergin; Julien Verrax; Zahid N Rabbani; Christophe J De Saedeleer; Kelly M Kennedy; Caroline Diepart; Bénédicte F Jordan; Michael J Kelley; Bernard Gallez; Miriam L Wahl; Olivier Feron; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Reciprocal metabolic reprogramming through lactate shuttle coordinately influences tumor-stroma interplay.

Authors:  Tania Fiaschi; Alberto Marini; Elisa Giannoni; Maria Letizia Taddei; Paolo Gandellini; Alina De Donatis; Michele Lanciotti; Sergio Serni; Paolo Cirri; Paola Chiarugi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Understanding the Warburg effect and the prognostic value of stromal caveolin-1 as a marker of a lethal tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Federica Sotgia; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Stephanos Pavlides; Anthony Howell; Richard G Pestell; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  The mitochondrial citrate transporter, CIC, is essential for mitochondrial homeostasis.

Authors:  Olga Catalina-Rodriguez; Vamsi K Kolukula; York Tomita; Anju Preet; Ferdinando Palmieri; Anton Wellstein; Stephen Byers; Amato J Giaccia; Eric Glasgow; Chris Albanese; Maria Laura Avantaggiati
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2012-10
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Shikonin enhances Adriamycin antitumor effects by inhibiting efflux pumps in A549 cells.

Authors:  Xuchun Liu; Gengyun Sun
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  JNK1 stress signaling is hyper-activated in high breast density and the tumor stroma: connecting fibrosis, inflammation, and stemness for cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael P Lisanti; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Stephanos Pavlides; Kimberley Jayne Reeves; Maria Peiris-Pagès; Amy L Chadwick; Rosa Sanchez-Alvarez; Rebecca Lamb; Anthony Howell; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Federica Sotgia
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  3-bromopyruvate enhanced daunorubicin-induced cytotoxicity involved in monocarboxylate transporter 1 in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Zhe Liu; Yiming Sun; Haiyu Hong; Surong Zhao; Xue Zou; Renqiang Ma; Chenchen Jiang; Zhiwei Wang; Huabin Li; Hao Liu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Bioinformatics analysis of the serine and glycine pathway in cancer cells.

Authors:  Alexey Antonov; Massimiliano Agostini; Maria Morello; Marilena Minieri; Gerry Melino; Ivano Amelio
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-11-30

5.  High Expression of PHGDH Predicts Poor Prognosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jinhong Zhu; Jianqun Ma; Xudong Wang; Tianjiao Ma; Shu Zhang; Wei Wang; Xiaoyu Zhou; Jiahai Shi
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  Metabolic Plasticity in Cancer Cells: Reconnecting Mitochondrial Function to Cancer Control.

Authors:  V Krishnan Ramanujan
Journal:  J Cell Sci Ther       Date:  2015-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.