Literature DB >> 23174427

Relational processing following stroke.

Glenda Andrews1, Graeme S Halford, David Shum, Annick Maujean, Mark Chappell, Damian Birney.   

Abstract

The research examined relational processing following stroke. Stroke patients (14 with frontal, 30 with non-frontal lesions) and 41 matched controls completed four relational processing tasks: sentence comprehension, Latin square matrix completion, modified Dimensional Change Card Sorting, and n-back. Each task included items at two or three levels of relational complexity. Relational processing was impaired in the stroke groups. This was due mainly to items at the intermediate ternary-relational level of complexity. Less complex binary-relational items and more complex quaternary-relational items (the latter are difficult for adults generally) were less sensitive to stroke status. Impairment was greater in frontal than non-frontal stroke patients. Positive inter-correlations among measures supported the domain-general nature of relational processing. Implications for assessment and intervention are discussed. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23174427     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  5 in total

1.  Planning following stroke: a relational complexity approach using the tower of london.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Graeme S Halford; Mark Chappell; Annick Maujean; David H K Shum
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Genetic basis of a cognitive complexity metric.

Authors:  Narelle K Hansell; Graeme S Halford; Glenda Andrews; David H K Shum; Sarah E Harris; Gail Davies; Sanja Franic; Andrea Christoforou; Brendan Zietsch; Jodie Painter; Sarah E Medland; Erik A Ehli; Gareth E Davies; Vidar M Steen; Astri J Lundervold; Ivar Reinvang; Grant W Montgomery; Thomas Espeseth; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; John M Starr; Nicholas G Martin; Stephanie Le Hellard; Dorret I Boomsma; Ian J Deary; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Resolving Conflicts Between Syntax and Plausibility in Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Jessica E Ogden; Graeme S Halford
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Post-Stroke Working Memory Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Selma Lugtmeijer; Nikki A Lammers; Edward H F de Haan; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Generating distant analogies facilitates relational integration: Intermediary role of relational mindset and cognitive load.

Authors:  Xuesong Du; Pei Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.