| Literature DB >> 23174420 |
Steffen Schumann1, Lutz-P Nolte, Guoyan Zheng.
Abstract
This paper studied two different regression techniques for pelvic shape prediction, i.e., the partial least square regression (PLSR) and the principal component regression (PCR). Three different predictors such as surface landmarks, morphological parameters, or surface models of neighboring structures were used in a cross-validation study to predict the pelvic shape. Results obtained from applying these two different regression techniques were compared to the population mean model. In almost all the prediction experiments, both regression techniques unanimously generated better results than the population mean model, while the difference on prediction accuracy between these two regression methods is not statistically significant (α=0.01).Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23174420 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomech ISSN: 0021-9290 Impact factor: 2.712