PURPOSE: The specific aims of the AIEOP-TW-2003 protocol included prospectively investigating a possible association of tumor loss of heterozygosity with outcomes in children treated for Wilms tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 125 unilateral favorable histology Wilms tumors registered between 2003 and 2008 in the Italian cooperative protocol for microsatellite markers mapped to chromosomes 1p, 7p, 11q, 16q and 22q. RESULTS: The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival probabilities were 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.93) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-1.0), respectively. Loss of heterozygosity at 1p was significantly associated with a worse disease-free survival (probability 0.67 for patients with and 0.92 for those without 1p loss of heterozygosity, p = 0.0009), as confirmed also by multivariate analysis adjusting for tumor stage and patient age at diagnosis. There was no difference in disease-free survival probability among children with loss of heterozygosity in the other chromosomal regions tested. The worse outlook for children older than 2 years at diagnosis did not seem to be influenced by the loss of heterozygosity patterns considered. CONCLUSIONS: Chromosome 1p loss of heterozygosity seems to be a risk factor for nonanaplastic Wilms tumor, possibly regardless of other clinical factors. Our findings were uninformative regarding loss of heterozygosity in the other chromosomal regions tested.
PURPOSE: The specific aims of the AIEOP-TW-2003 protocol included prospectively investigating a possible association of tumor loss of heterozygosity with outcomes in children treated for Wilms tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 125 unilateral favorable histology Wilms tumors registered between 2003 and 2008 in the Italian cooperative protocol for microsatellite markers mapped to chromosomes 1p, 7p, 11q, 16q and 22q. RESULTS: The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival probabilities were 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.93) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-1.0), respectively. Loss of heterozygosity at 1p was significantly associated with a worse disease-free survival (probability 0.67 for patients with and 0.92 for those without 1p loss of heterozygosity, p = 0.0009), as confirmed also by multivariate analysis adjusting for tumor stage and patient age at diagnosis. There was no difference in disease-free survival probability among children with loss of heterozygosity in the other chromosomal regions tested. The worse outlook for children older than 2 years at diagnosis did not seem to be influenced by the loss of heterozygosity patterns considered. CONCLUSIONS: Chromosome 1p loss of heterozygosity seems to be a risk factor for nonanaplastic Wilms tumor, possibly regardless of other clinical factors. Our findings were uninformative regarding loss of heterozygosity in the other chromosomal regions tested.
Authors: Eric J Gratias; Jeffrey S Dome; Lawrence J Jennings; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Tian; James Anderson; Paul Grundy; Elizabeth A Mullen; James I Geller; Conrad V Fernandez; Elizabeth J Perlman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey S Dome; Norbert Graf; James I Geller; Conrad V Fernandez; Elizabeth A Mullen; Filippo Spreafico; Marry Van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Kathy Pritchard-Jones Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eugene B Cone; Stewart S Dalton; Megan Van Noord; Elizabeth T Tracy; Henry E Rice; Jonathan C Routh Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: J A Hol; M I Lopez-Yurda; H Van Tinteren; M Van Grotel; J Godzinski; G Vujanic; F Oldenburger; B De Camargo; G L Ramírez-Villar; C Bergeron; K Pritchard-Jones; N Graf; M M Van den Heuvel-Eibrink Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 3.240