Literature DB >> 23173899

Clinical comparison of the Welch Allyn SureSight™ handheld autorefractor vs. streak retinoscopy in dogs.

Allyson D Groth1, Steven R Hollingsworth, Ron Ofri, Philip H Kass, Zoe Reed, Christopher J Murphy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Welch Allyn SureSight™ wavefront autorefractor with retinoscopy in normal dogs. ANIMALS STUDIED: Fifty privately owned dogs (100 eyes) of 20 breeds, free of ocular disease. Mean ± SD age: 5.7 ± 3.25 years (range: 6 months-13 years). PROCEDURES: The refractive error was determined in each eye by two experienced retinoscopists using streak retinoscopy as well as by an autorefractor operated by two different examiners. Measurements were performed before and approximately 30-45 min after cycloplegia was induced by cyclopentolate 0.5% and tropicamide 0.5% ophthalmic solutions.
RESULTS: Mean ± SD noncyclopleged retinoscopy net sphere was -0.55 ± 1.14 (range: -3.75 to 3.5) diopters (D). Mean cyclopleged retinoscopy net sphere was -0.52 ± 1.18 (range: -4.25 to 2) D. Mean ± SD noncyclopleged autorefractor spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.42 ± 1.13 D (range: -3.36 to 2.73) D. Mean cyclopleged autorefractor SE was 0.10 ± 1.47 (range: -5.62 to 3.19) D. Noncyclopleged autorefraction results were not significantly different from streak retinoscopy (whether noncyclopleged or cyclopleged, P = 0.80 and P = 0.26, respectively). Cyclopleged autorefraction results were significantly different from noncyclopleged or cyclopleged streak retinoscopy (P < 0.0001 in both states). There was no significant difference between noncyclopleged and cyclopleged streak retinoscopy (P = 0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Noncyclopleged autorefraction shows good agreement with streak retinoscopy in dogs and may be a useful clinical technique. Cycloplegia does not significantly affect streak retinoscopy results in dogs.
© 2012 American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SureSight™; autorefractor; comparison; dog; refractive error; retinoscopy; streak retinoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23173899      PMCID: PMC4280102          DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2012.01075.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1463-5216            Impact factor:   1.644


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.

Authors:  Yee-Fong Choong; Ai-Hong Chen; Pik-Pin Goh
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Naturally occurring vitreous chamber-based myopia in the Labrador retriever.

Authors:  D O Mutti; K Zadnik; C J Murphy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Myopia and refractive error in dogs.

Authors:  C J Murphy; K Zadnik; M J Mannis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Ocular components in three breeds of dogs with high prevalence of myopia.

Authors:  Laura A Williams; Melissa A Kubai; Christopher J Murphy; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Effect of optical defocus on visual acuity in dogs.

Authors:  C J Murphy; D O Mutti; K Zadnik; J Ver Hoeve
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Clinical comparison of the Welch Allyn SureSight handheld autorefractor versus cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopic refraction.

Authors:  Joseph D Iuorno; William D Grant; Léon-Paul Noël
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  A canine model of inherited myopia: familial aggregation of refractive error in labrador retrievers.

Authors:  Joanna Black; Sharon R Browning; Andrew V Collins; John R Phillips
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Refractive states of eyes and association between ametropia and breed in dogs.

Authors:  Melissa A Kubai; Ellison Bentley; Paul E Miller; Donald O Mutti; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.156

9.  Refractive state of aphakic and pseudophakic eyes of dogs.

Authors:  M G Davidson; C J Murphy; M P Nasisse; A S Hellkamp; D K Olivero; M C Brinkmann; L H Campbell
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.156

10.  Comparison of capsular opacification and refractive status after placement of three different intraocular lens implants following phacoemulsification and aspiration of cataracts in dogs.

Authors:  Barrett W Gift; Robert V English; Brad Nadelstein; Anne K Weigt; Brian C Gilger
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.644

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Aging Dogs Manifest Myopia as Measured by Autorefractor.

Authors:  Jerome Hernandez; Cecil Moore; Xuemei Si; Stuart Richer; Janet Jackson; Wei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The ophthalmic health and refractive state of working dogs in South Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana Kravetz de Oliveira; Mariza Bortolini; Melissa Schaller; Rafaela Kava Schuchmann; Bret A Moore; Fabiano Montiani-Ferreira
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2020-02-11

3.  Antioxidant supplementation increases retinal responses and decreases refractive error changes in dogs.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jerome Hernandez; Cecil Moore; Janet Jackson; Kristina Narfström
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2016-05-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.