Literature DB >> 23173826

Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on vital bone formation and implant survival: a retrospective study.

Stuart J Froum1, Ismael Khouly, Giovanni Favero, Sang-Choon Cho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The maxillary sinus augmentation procedure (SAP) using the lateral window technique has been documented to be a highly predictable procedure. However, the most common intraoperative complication has been reported to be maxillary sinus membrane perforation (MSMP). The present study evaluates the percentage of vital bone and implant survival in sinuses that had perforations repaired during surgery versus a non-perforated sinus group.
METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from an Institutional Review Board-approved anonymous database at New York University, Kriser Dental Center, Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, New York, New York, from 23 patients who had undergone SAP with a total of 40 treated sinuses. Sinuses were grafted with mineralized cancellous bone allograft, anorganic bovine bone matrix, or biphasic calcium phospate. Perforation complications occurred in 15 sinuses with 25 non-perforated sinuses. All perforations were repaired during surgery with absorbable collagen membrane barriers. Histologic cores were taken from all treated sinuses 26 to 32 weeks after surgery. The implant success rate of 79 placed implants was recorded.
RESULTS: The average percentage of vital bone was 26.3% ± 6.3% in the perforated (repaired) sinuses versus 19.1% ± 6.3% in the non-perforated sinuses. The differences were statistically significant (SS). The implant success rate was 100% (35 of 35) compared to 95.5% (43 of 45) in the perforated/repaired vs. non-perforated sinuses, respectively. There was no SS difference in implant failure rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The augmented sinuses in this study that exhibited MSMPs that occurred during the SAP (which were treated during surgery) show SS greater vital bone percentages compared with the non-perforated sinus group. There were no SS differences in implant survival in the perforated versus non-perforated groups. In this study, sinus MSMPs, when properly repaired during surgery, do not appear to be an adverse complication in terms of vital bone production or implant survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23173826     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.120458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  9 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Schneiderian Membrane Thickening on the Maxillary Sinus Augmentation and Implantation Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Anahita Moscowchi; Majedeh Nami
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2021-04-02

2.  Tomographic Imaging of Mucociliary Clearance Following Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series.

Authors:  Won-Bae Park; Nam-Jun Cho; Philip Kang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 3.  The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Zhe-Zhen Lin; Yan-Qing Jiao; Zhang-Yan Ye; Ge-Ge Wang; Xi Ding
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 4.  Influence of exposing dental implants into the sinus cavity on survival and complications rate: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gian Maria Ragucci; Basel Elnayef; Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo; Hom-Lay Wang; Federico Hernández-Alfaro; Jordi Gargallo-Albiol
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-02-05

5.  Comparative preclinical assessment of the use of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane to repair perforated sinus membranes.

Authors:  Yun-Young Chang; Su-Hwan Kim; Mi-Seon Goh; Jeong-Ho Yun
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Grasso; Stefano Mummolo; Sara Bernardi; Davide Pietropaoli; Giuseppe D'Ambrosio; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli; Serena Bianchi; Enrico Marchetti
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Simultaneous placement of short implants (≤ 8 mm) versus standard length implants (≥ 10 mm) after sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxillae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Tang; Qianhui Du; Jiaying Luo; Lin Peng
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-05

Review 8.  Management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach in relation to subsequent implant survival rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Alfredo Díaz-Olivares; Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann; Natalia Martínez-Rodríguez; José María Martínez-González; Juan López-Quiles; Isabel Leco-Berrocal; Cristina Meniz-García
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-12

Review 9.  Membrane perforation rate in lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation using conventional rotating instruments and piezoelectric device-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Corinne Jordi; Khaled Mukaddam; Jörg Thomas Lambrecht; Sebastian Kühl
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-01-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.