OBJECTIVES: We report the results of a large single-center study evaluating predictors and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with different devices and access routes according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC). BACKGROUND: The widespread adoption of TAVI warrants a systematic analysis of outcomes. Only few comprehensive data exist comparing different approaches as selected by a heart team. METHODS: TAVI was performed in 326 consecutive patients (mean age 80.6 ± 7.1 years, 55.5% female) at high risk for surgery with balloon-expandable and self-expanding devices through transfemoral or transapical access. Data were analyzed according to VARC endpoints; predictors of mortality were identified. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was 10.1% (30 days) and 29.9% (1 year) overall and comparable with regard to valve or access choice (P = 0.295) despite different risk profiles at baseline. Device success and 30-day safety endpoints were achieved in 87.1 and 21.2%. Myocardial infarction [hazard ratio (HR) 6.52], stage-2 and -3 acute kidney injury (HR 2.52 and 6.80) and major access site complications (HR 1.96) were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality. Device success had a protective effect (HR 0.58). Baseline predictors included body mass index <20 kg/m(2) (HR 3.20), NYHA class IV (HR 1.87), left ventricular ejection-fraction <30% (HR 2.30), higher STS-PROM scores (HR 1.05 per percent), and age (group 75-85 years, HR 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable results were achieved with different devices and access routes in a heart team approach. Baseline and perioperative predictors of all-cause mortality were identified, contributing to the refinement of patient and device selection criteria for TAVI.
OBJECTIVES: We report the results of a large single-center study evaluating predictors and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with different devices and access routes according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC). BACKGROUND: The widespread adoption of TAVI warrants a systematic analysis of outcomes. Only few comprehensive data exist comparing different approaches as selected by a heart team. METHODS: TAVI was performed in 326 consecutive patients (mean age 80.6 ± 7.1 years, 55.5% female) at high risk for surgery with balloon-expandable and self-expanding devices through transfemoral or transapical access. Data were analyzed according to VARC endpoints; predictors of mortality were identified. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was 10.1% (30 days) and 29.9% (1 year) overall and comparable with regard to valve or access choice (P = 0.295) despite different risk profiles at baseline. Device success and 30-day safety endpoints were achieved in 87.1 and 21.2%. Myocardial infarction [hazard ratio (HR) 6.52], stage-2 and -3 acute kidney injury (HR 2.52 and 6.80) and major access site complications (HR 1.96) were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality. Device success had a protective effect (HR 0.58). Baseline predictors included body mass index <20 kg/m(2) (HR 3.20), NYHA class IV (HR 1.87), left ventricular ejection-fraction <30% (HR 2.30), higher STS-PROM scores (HR 1.05 per percent), and age (group 75-85 years, HR 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable results were achieved with different devices and access routes in a heart team approach. Baseline and perioperative predictors of all-cause mortality were identified, contributing to the refinement of patient and device selection criteria for TAVI.
Authors: Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus; Yang Lei; Philip Green; Ajay J Kirtane; Samir Kapadia; Vinod H Thourani; Howard C Herrmann; Nirat Beohar; Alan Zajarias; Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; David J Cohen Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-09-10
Authors: Suzanne V Arnold; Matthew R Reynolds; Yang Lei; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Ajay J Kirtane; Susheel K Kodali; Alan Zajarias; Vinod H Thourani; Philip Green; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Nirat Beohar; Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; David J Cohen Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: X Luo; Z Zhao; H Chai; C Zhang; Y Liao; Q Li; Y Peng; W Liu; X Ren; Q Meng; C Chen; M Chen; Y Feng; D Huang Journal: Herz Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Jayendrakumar S Patel; Amar Krishnaswamy; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; Stephanie Mick; Samir R Kapadia Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Dadi Dai; Sean M O'Brien; Suzanne J Baron; Ajay J Kirtane; Michael J Mack; Philip Green; Matthew R Reynolds; John S Rumsfeld; David J Cohen Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Patrick Diemert; Philipp Lange; Martin Greif; Moritz Seiffert; Lenard Conradi; Steffen Massberg; Stefan Blankenberg; Hermann Reichenspurner; Christian Hagl; Christoph Schmitz; Holger Schröfel; Hendrik Treede; Gerhard Schymik; Christian Kupatt Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Moritz Seiffert; Jan-Malte Sinning; Alexander Meyer; Sandra Wilde; Lenard Conradi; Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera; Alexander Ghanem; Jörg Kempfert; Christoph Hammerstingl; Francisco M Ojeda; Won-Keun Kim; Dietmar H Koschyk; Johannes Schirmer; Stephan Baldus; Eberhard Grube; Helge Möllmann; Hermann Reichenspurner; Georg Nickenig; Stefan Blankenberg; Patrick Diemert; Hendrik Treede; Thomas Walther; Nikos Werner; Renate B Schnabel Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 5.460