Literature DB >> 23172483

Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations.

Graziela Ávila Prado Galhano1, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, José Vitor Quinelli Mazaro.   

Abstract

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing images can be taken through either direct or indirect imaging. For the indirect systems, the digitalization is obtained from the impression material or cast, and for the direct ones the image is taken directly from the mouth using intraoral scanners.The direct acquisition systems have been constantly improved because these are less invasive, quicker, and more precise than the conventional method. Besides, the digital images can be easily stored for a long time. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to describe and discuss based on the literature the main direct image acquisition systems available on the market: CEREC Bluecam (Sirona), Lava C.O.S. System (3M ESPE), iTero System (Cadent/Straumann), and E4D System (D4D Technologies).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23172483     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826b8043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  9 in total

1.  Digital work-flow.

Authors:  V Marsango; R Bollero; N D'Ovidio; M Miranda; P Bollero; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

2.  In Vitro Comparison of Three Intraoral Scanners for Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses.

Authors:  Vitória Costa; António Sérgio Silva; Rosana Costa; Pedro Barreiros; Joana Mendes; José Manuel Mendes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  A comparison of the marginal adaptation of composite overlays fabricated with silicone and an intraoral scanner.

Authors:  Carla García-Cuesta; Vicente Faus-Llácer; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; René Botello-Torres; Vicente Faus-Matoses
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 4.  Assessment of Chair-side Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing Restorations: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kusai Baroudi; Shukran Nasser Ibraheem
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-04

5.  Comparison of the accuracy of digitally fabricated polyurethane model and conventional gypsum model.

Authors:  So-Yeun Kim; So-Hyoun Lee; Seong-Keun Cho; Chang-Mo Jeong; Young-Chan Jeon; Mi-Jung Yun; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  In-vitro evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using digital scanning technologies.

Authors:  Çise Özal; Mutahhar Ulusoy
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking Using Intraoral Scanner versus the Conventional Technique.

Authors:  Arash Zarbakhsh; Ezatollah Jalalian; Nazanin Samiei; Mohammad Hossein Mahgoli; Hadi Kaseb Ghane
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-02-10

8.  Evaluation of a Digital Protocol for Pre-Surgical Orthopedic Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate in Newborn Patients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Domenico Dalessandri; Ingrid Tonni; Laura Laffranchi; Marco Migliorati; Gaetano Isola; Stefano Bonetti; Luca Visconti; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-09

9.  Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis.

Authors:  Cristian Abad-Coronel; Elena Carrera; Nancy Mena Córdova; Jorge I Fajardo; Paulina Aliaga
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.