Literature DB >> 23171835

Reservoir competence of vertebrate hosts for Anaplasma phagocytophilum.

Felicia Keesing1, Michelle H Hersh, Michael Tibbetts, Diana J McHenry, Shannon Duerr, Jesse Brunner, Mary Killilea, Kathleen LoGiudice, Kenneth A Schmidt, Richard S Ostfeld.   

Abstract

Fourteen vertebrate species (10 mammals and 4 birds) were assessed for their ability to transmit Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the bacterium that causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis, to uninfected feeding ixodid ticks. Small mammals were most likely to infect ticks but all species assessed were capable of transmitting the bacterium, in contrast to previous findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23171835      PMCID: PMC3557888          DOI: 10.3201/eid1812.120919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), formerly known as human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, is an emerging infectious disease in the United States, Europe, and Asia (,). In the United States, most reported cases are concentrated in north-central and northeastern states. Patients with HGA typically have nonspecific febrile symptoms, including fever, chills, headache, and myalgia (). Most patients with HGA respond well to antimicrobial drug treatment, but complications are not uncommon and some cases are fatal (). Because of difficulties in diagnosis and lack of awareness of HGA by physicians and the public, many cases are misdiagnosed, and national statistics likely dramatically underreport this disease (). HGA is caused by a rickettsial bacterium, Anaplasma phagocytophilum (), groups of which form dense aggregations in granulocytes (). The bacterium is passed from host to host through the bite of an infected ixodid tick: Ixodes scapularis in the eastern and central United States and Ix. pacificus in the western United States (–). Serosurveys and molecular diagnostics within disease-endemic zones show that many ground-dwelling vertebrate species are exposed to or infected with A. phagocytophilum (). These data indicate that tick-to-host transmission rates are high and that infection is widespread in host communities. However, few studies have examined rates of transmission from infected hosts to uninfected ticks, a trait known as the reservoir competence of these hosts. Quantification of host species–specific reservoir competence can identify animals most responsible for producing infected ticks and therefore increasing risk for human exposure. Overall, robust quantitative information on reservoir competence is scarce and key hosts remain unstudied. We determined the reservoir competence for A. phagocytophilum of 14 species (10 mammals and 4 birds) in a disease-endemic region of the eastern United States.

The Study

All procedures were conducted after approval from the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. We conducted our research in Dutchess County, New York, a region where human cases of anaplasmosis are rapidly increasing. We trapped hosts on the property of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (Millbrook, NY, USA) during the peak abundance of larval blacklegged ticks (Ix. scapularis) during July–September in 2008, 2009, and 2010. Detailed methods have been reported (). We held members of 10 mammal and 4 bird species (Table 1) for 3 days in cages with wire mesh floors suspended over pans lined with wet paper towels. Ticks feeding on hosts were allowed to feed to repletion and drop from hosts into the pans, from which they were collected. In some cases, if hosts did not drop >10 ticks within 3 days, we infested them with unfed larval ticks following methods described (). Because no evidence has been found for transovarial transmission of A. phagocytophilum () or of infection in larval ticks, these infestations likely did not affect host exposure to the pathogen. Hosts that had been infested were held for an additional 4 days, and engorged ticks were collected each day. All engorged larval ticks were held in moistened glass vials at constant temperature and humidity until they molted into the nymphal stage. Newly molted nymphs were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
Table 1

Host species tested for Anaplasma phagocytophiluum reservoir competence, southeastern New York, USA, 2008–2010*

Host speciesCommon nameNo. hosts testedNo. ticks testedMean no. ticks sampled per host (range)
Mammals
Blarina brevicauda Northern short-tailed shrew2852918.9 (11–25)
Didelphis virginiana Virginia opossum2550120.0 (11–25)
Glaucomys volans Southern flying squirrel45914.8 (6–25)
Mephitis mephitis Striped skunk12121.0 (21–21)
Peromyscus leucopus White-footed mouse3057119.0 (10–25)
Procyon lotor Raccoon2548419.4 (10–25)
Sciurus carolinensis Eastern gray squirrel2035817.9 (10–25)
Sorex cinereus Masked shrew6416.8 (4–10)
Tamias striatus Eastern chipmunk1930015.8 (9–25)
Tamiasciurus hudsonicus Eastern red squirrel1529719.8 (11–25)
Birds
Catharus fuscescens Veery2142720.3 (10–25)
Dumetella carolinensis Gray catbird1423516.8 (9–24)
Hylocichla mustelina Wood thrush2849617.7 (10–24)
Turdus migratorius American robin1832117.8 (8–24)

*Number of ticks tested per host can include samples from either natural body loads or experimental infestations, as described in the text, and is not representative of mean total body loads.

*Number of ticks tested per host can include samples from either natural body loads or experimental infestations, as described in the text, and is not representative of mean total body loads. DNA extraction was conducted as described (). To amplify extracted DNA, we used protocols reported by Courtney et al. (). Briefly, we used primers ApMSP2f and ApMSP2r and probe ApMSP2p, which are specific for the msp2 gene of A. phagocytophilum and generate a 77-bp fragment. Real-time PCR was performed by using a CFX96 Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) . We used extracted DNA from unfed larval ticks and ultrapure water as negative controls to account for potential contamination during the extraction and PCR processes, respectively. The cloned 77-bp fragment was used as a positive control. Barrier pipette tips were used throughout the process to prevent contamination. We conducted 3 replicate PCRs per tick. Ticks were considered positive for A. phagocytophilum if any 1 of 3 replicate samples showed amplified DNA for A. phagocytophilum relative to negative controls. Ticks with marginal results (i.e., moderate fluorescence) were tested a second time with the same primers and SYBR green dye. For these confirmatory tests, we included a melt curve analysis in which we determined the temperature at which half of the PCR products had denatured. PCR products were heated from 70°C through 85°C, raising the temperature by 0.5°C every 10 s. Positive controls consistently had melting point maxima of 80.5°C. Using a TOPO-TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), we cloned and sequenced 140 fragments that had a melting point of 80.5°C. Identity of sequences was confirmed by conducting BLAST searches (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA) of GenBank using the blastn algorithm (). One hundred thirty-one of 140 fragments were identified as A. phagocytophilum; the remaining 9 fragments either had poor-quality sequences or did not have the cloning vector inserted. If any replicate was positive in the confirmatory test, ticks were considered positive for A. phagocytophilum. If all 3 replicates in the confirmatory test showed marginal or negative results, the ticks were considered negative. Reservoir competence for each host species was calculated as the average percentage of ticks infected per individual host. Using data for 4,640 ticks collected from 254 animals over 3 years, we assessed levels of reservoir competence for 14 host species (10 mammals and 4 birds) (Table 1). Short-tailed shrews, white-footed mice, and eastern chipmunks had mean levels of reservoir competence >10% (Figure 1). All other hosts, including opossums, gray and red squirrels, and all 4 species of birds, had mean levels of reservoir competence ranging from 2% to 10%. Reservoir competence differed significantly among these 11 species (F = 2.294, df = 10,232, p = 0.014, by 2-way analysis of variance). Southern flying squirrels, striped skunks, and masked shrews all transmitted A. phagocytophilum to ticks, but our sample sizes were too small to draw strong conclusions about reservoir competence. For species that we collected in abundant numbers in multiple years (>4 animals in >2 years), reservoir competence of each species did not vary significantly from year to year (p>0.10 for all species tested, by analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate) (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Mean reservoir competence of 14 host species (10 mammals and 4 birds) for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, southeastern New York, USA, 2008–2010. Error bars indicate SE. Reservoir competence is defined as the mean percentage of ticks infected by any individual host of a given species. Host species with <10 individual hosts sampled are indicated by an asterisk. See Table 1 for sample sizes. Single-letter abbreviations for genera along the left indicate Blarina, Didelphis, Glaucomys, Mephitis, Peromyscus, Procyon, Sciurus, Sorex, Tamias, Tamiasciurus, Catharus, Dumetella, Hylocichla, and Turdus, respectively.

Figure 2

Mean reservoir competence of 14 host species (10 mammals and 4 birds) for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, southeastern New York, USA, 2008–2010. Error bars indicate SE. Reservoir competence is defined as the mean percentage of ticks infected by any individual host of a given species. For inclusion, sample sizes for a species had to be >4 in >2 years. No species showed significant variation in reservoir competence across years (p>0.10, by 2-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate, for all species tested). Single-letter abbreviations for genera along the left indicate Blarina, Didelphis, Peromyscus, Procyon, Sciurus, Tamias, Catharus, and Turdus, respectively.

Mean reservoir competence of 14 host species (10 mammals and 4 birds) for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, southeastern New York, USA, 2008–2010. Error bars indicate SE. Reservoir competence is defined as the mean percentage of ticks infected by any individual host of a given species. Host species with <10 individual hosts sampled are indicated by an asterisk. See Table 1 for sample sizes. Single-letter abbreviations for genera along the left indicate Blarina, Didelphis, Glaucomys, Mephitis, Peromyscus, Procyon, Sciurus, Sorex, Tamias, Tamiasciurus, Catharus, Dumetella, Hylocichla, and Turdus, respectively. Mean reservoir competence of 14 host species (10 mammals and 4 birds) for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, southeastern New York, USA, 2008–2010. Error bars indicate SE. Reservoir competence is defined as the mean percentage of ticks infected by any individual host of a given species. For inclusion, sample sizes for a species had to be >4 in >2 years. No species showed significant variation in reservoir competence across years (p>0.10, by 2-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate, for all species tested). Single-letter abbreviations for genera along the left indicate Blarina, Didelphis, Peromyscus, Procyon, Sciurus, Tamias, Catharus, and Turdus, respectively.

Conclusions

Our data contradict several assumptions about the role of hosts in infecting ticks with A. phagocytophilum. First, the role of the white-footed mouse in infecting ticks has been controversial (). Our data suggest that although the mouse is a major reservoir, short-tailed shrews and eastern chipmunks have comparable levels of reservoir competence. In addition, previous work has suggested that chipmunks, skunks, and opossums do not infect feeding ticks (). At our sites, all of these species infected feeding ticks (Table 2). Thus, the potential for these hosts to contribute to human risk for HGA should not be ignored.
Table 2

Host species infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum southeastern New York, USA, 2008–2010*

Host speciesNo. hosts infected/no. tested (%)No. (%) ticks infectedMean % infected ticks per infected host (range)
Mammals
Blarina brevicauda 17/28 (61)67 (13)20 (4–56)
Didelphis virginiana 9/25 (36)20 (4)13 (4–50)
Glaucomys volans2/4 (50)5 (8)15 (14–16)
Mephitis mephitis1/1 (100)2 (10)10
Peromyscus leucopus 15/30 (50)63 (11)22 (4–50)
Procyon lotor 10/25 (40)17 (4)9 (4–20)
Sciurus carolinensis 14/20 (70)19 (5)8 (4–20)
Sorex cinereus2/6 (33)4 (10)23 (17–30)
Tamias striatus 10/19 (53)40 (13)24 (6–46)
Tamiasciurus hudsonicus 7/15 (47)17 (6)17 (4–73)
Birds
Catharus fuscescens 9/21 (43)19 (4)10 (4–25)
Dumetella carolinensis 7/14 (50)20 (9)18 (4–33)
Hylocichla mustelina 14/28 (50)27 (5)10 (4–25)
Turdus migratorius 6/18 (33)7 (2)6 (4–11)

*Infected hosts are those that transmitted A. phagocytophilum to >1 Ixodes scapularis tick larva.
†Host species with <10 individual hosts sampled.

*Infected hosts are those that transmitted A. phagocytophilum to >1 Ixodes scapularis tick larva.
†Host species with <10 individual hosts sampled. Because hosts are capable of clearing A. phagocytophilum infections (), surveys of host exposure might not represent species-specific probabilities of transmitting the pathogen to uninfected ticks. Instead, the role of particular species in contributing to the pool of infected ticks is best assessed by determining host reservoir competence using field-captured animals that usually carry ticks. On the basis of the community of hosts we sampled, small mammals are most responsible for infecting uninfected larval ticks in nature, and this result is consistent across years.
  13 in total

1.  Basic local alignment search tool.

Authors:  S F Altschul; W Gish; W Miller; E W Myers; D J Lipman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Hosts as ecological traps for the vector of Lyme disease.

Authors:  F Keesing; J Brunner; S Duerr; M Killilea; K Logiudice; K Schmidt; H Vuong; R S Ostfeld
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Immunity reduces reservoir host competence of Peromyscus leucopus for Ehrlichia phagocytophila.

Authors:  M L Levin; D Fish
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Detection of the agents of human ehrlichioses in ixodid ticks from California.

Authors:  V L Kramer; M P Randolph; L T Hui; W E Irwin; A G Gutierrez; D J Vugia
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Epidemiology of human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in the United States, 2001-2002.

Authors:  Linda J Demma; Robert C Holman; Jennifer H McQuiston; John W Krebs; David L Swerdlow
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Comparison of the reservoir competence of medium-sized mammals and Peromyscus leucopus for Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Connecticut.

Authors:  Michael L Levin; William L Nicholson; Robert F Massung; John W Sumner; Durland Fish
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Joshua W Courtney; Leah M Kostelnik; Nordin S Zeidner; Robert F Massung
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Ecology of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi in the western United States.

Authors:  Janet E Foley; Patrick Foley; Richard N Brown; Robert S Lane; J Steven Dumlers; John E Madigan
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Acquisition and transmission of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis by Ixodes scapularis ticks.

Authors:  E Hodzic; D Fish; C M Maretzki; A M De Silva; S Feng; S W Barthold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparative genomics of emerging human ehrlichiosis agents.

Authors:  Julie C Dunning Hotopp; Mingqun Lin; Ramana Madupu; Jonathan Crabtree; Samuel V Angiuoli; Jonathan A Eisen; Jonathan Eisen; Rekha Seshadri; Qinghu Ren; Martin Wu; Teresa R Utterback; Shannon Smith; Matthew Lewis; Hoda Khouri; Chunbin Zhang; Hua Niu; Quan Lin; Norio Ohashi; Ning Zhi; William Nelson; Lauren M Brinkac; Robert J Dodson; M J Rosovitz; Jaideep Sundaram; Sean C Daugherty; Tanja Davidsen; Anthony S Durkin; Michelle Gwinn; Daniel H Haft; Jeremy D Selengut; Steven A Sullivan; Nikhat Zafar; Liwei Zhou; Faiza Benahmed; Heather Forberger; Rebecca Halpin; Stephanie Mulligan; Jeffrey Robinson; Owen White; Yasuko Rikihisa; Hervé Tettelin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Tick-Borne Zoonoses in the United States: Persistent and Emerging Threats to Human Health.

Authors:  Rebecca J Eisen; Kiersten J Kugeler; Lars Eisen; Charles B Beard; Christopher D Paddock
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2017-12-15

2.  Prevalence of human-active and variant 1 strains of the tick-borne pathogen Anaplasma phagocytophilum in hosts and forests of eastern North America.

Authors:  Felicia Keesing; Diana J McHenry; Michelle Hersh; Michael Tibbetts; Jesse L Brunner; Mary Killilea; Kathleen LoGiudice; Kenneth A Schmidt; Richard S Ostfeld
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Occurrence and transmission efficiencies of Borrelia burgdorferi ospC types in avian and mammalian wildlife.

Authors:  Holly B Vuong; Charles D Canham; Dina M Fonseca; Dustin Brisson; Peter J Morin; Peter E Smouse; Richard S Ostfeld
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 4.  Peromyscus transcriptomics: Understanding adaptation and gene expression plasticity within and between species of deer mice.

Authors:  Jason Munshi-South; Jonathan L Richardson
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 5.  A quantitative synthesis of the role of birds in carrying ticks and tick-borne pathogens in North America.

Authors:  Scott R Loss; Bruce H Noden; Gabriel L Hamer; Sarah A Hamer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum: Rickettsiales pathogens of veterinary and public health significance.

Authors:  Farhan Ahmad Atif
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Potential effects of blood meal host on bacterial community composition in Ixodes scapularis nymphs.

Authors:  William J Landesman; Kenneth Mulder; Brian F Allan; Laura A Bashor; Felicia Keesing; Kathleen LoGiudice; Richard S Ostfeld
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 3.744

8.  Field evaluation of a novel oral reservoir-targeted vaccine against Borrelia burgdorferi utilizing an inactivated whole-cell bacterial antigen expression vehicle.

Authors:  Kirby C Stafford; Scott C Williams; Jolieke G van Oosterwijk; Megan A Linske; Steve Zatechka; Luciana M Richer; Goudarz Molaei; Chris Przybyszewski; Stephen K Wikel
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  The dilution effect behind the scenes: testing the underlying assumptions of its mechanisms through quantifying the long-term dynamics and effects of a pathogen in multiple host species.

Authors:  Mario Garrido; Snir Halle; Ron Flatau; Carmit Cohen; Álvaro Navarro-Castilla; Isabel Barja; Hadas Hawlena
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.530

10.  Spatial and seasonal variation in the prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks in Norway.

Authors:  Atle Mysterud; William Ryan Easterday; Lars Qviller; Hildegunn Viljugrein; Bjørnar Ytrehus
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.