Literature DB >> 23171739

embB306 mutations as molecular indicators to predict ethambutol susceptibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Frederick A Sirgel1, Robin M Warren, Elizabeth M Streicher, Thomas C Victor, Paul D van Helden, Erik C Böttger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discordant results in conventional susceptibility testing of ethambutol against Mycobacterium tuberculosis may lead to underreporting of drug resistance.
METHODS: A 240-bp region of the embB gene in 111 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis was sequenced and examined for mutations linked to ethambutol resistance. The phenotypic susceptibility levels of the isolates were quantified by the BACTEC™ MGIT 960™ TB System and correlated with the genotypic test results. These data were analyzed to find information that could be used to clarify discordant ethambutol susceptibility test results.
RESULTS: Mutations M306I (n = 56), M306V (n = 18) and M306L (n = 3) in M. tuberculosis showed decreased susceptibility to ethambutol. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in 73% (56/77) of embB306 mutants were at or just above the critical concentration (MICs, 5.0 to ≤12.5 µg/ml) of ethambutol reflecting borderline (or intermediate) resistance. Eight ethambutol-resistant isolates lacked embB mutations, probably due to mutational alterations elsewhere in the genome.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that clinical isolates containing embB306 mutations with MICs overlapping the critical concentration are associated with discordant ethambutol susceptibility test results. The clinical significance of borderline resistance in combination treatment of tuberculosis remains to be determined before alternative ethambutol breakpoints are considered.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23171739     DOI: 10.1159/000343474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  6 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting the mutant prevention concentration to guide dosing in childhood tuberculosis.

Authors:  Devan Jaganath; H Simon Schaaf; Peter R Donald
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Re-evaluation of the critical concentration for ethambutol antimicrobial sensitivity testing on the MGIT 960.

Authors:  Sara Christianson; Dylan Voth; Joyce Wolfe; Meenu K Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Whole genome sequencing based characterization of extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Pakistan.

Authors:  Asho Ali; Zahra Hasan; Ruth McNerney; Kim Mallard; Grant Hill-Cawthorne; Francesc Coll; Mridul Nair; Arnab Pain; Taane G Clark; Rumina Hasan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessment of a 96-Well Plate Assay of Quantitative Drug Susceptibility Testing for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex in China.

Authors:  Hui Xia; Yang Zheng; Bing Zhao; Susan van den Hof; Frank Cobelens; YanLin Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The rationale for using rifabutin in the treatment of MDR and XDR tuberculosis outbreaks.

Authors:  Frederick A Sirgel; Robin M Warren; Erik C Böttger; Marisa Klopper; Thomas C Victor; Paul D van Helden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of a microcolony growth monitoring method for the rapid determination of ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Alice L den Hertog; Sandra Menting; Ernst T Smienk; Jim Werngren; Sven Hoffner; Richard M Anthony
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.