Literature DB >> 23171344

Vegetation dynamics drive segregation by body size in Galapagos tortoises migrating across altitudinal gradients.

Stephen Blake1, Charles B Yackulic, Fredy Cabrera, Washington Tapia, James P Gibbs, Franz Kümmeth, Martin Wikelski.   

Abstract

Seasonal migration has evolved in many taxa as a response to predictable spatial and temporal variation in the environment. Individual traits, physiology and social state interact with environmental factors to increase the complexity of migratory systems. Despite a huge body of research, the ultimate causes of migration remain unclear. A relatively simple, tractable system - giant tortoises on Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos, was studied to elucidate the roles of environmental variation and individual traits in a partial migratory system. Specifically, we asked: (i) do Galapagos tortoises undergo long-distance seasonal migrations? (ii) is tortoise migration ultimately driven by gradients in forage quality or temperature; and (iii) how do sex and body size influence migration patterns? We recorded the daily locations of 17 GPS-tagged tortoises and walked a monthly survey along the altitudinal gradient to characterize the movements and distribution of tortoises of different sizes and sexes. Monthly temperature and rainfall data were obtained from weather stations deployed at various altitudes, and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index was used as a proxy for forage quality. Analyses using net displacement or daily movement characteristics did not agree on assigning individuals as either migratory or non-migratory; however, both methods suggested that some individuals were migratory. Adult tortoises of both sexes move up and down an altitudinal gradient in response to changes in vegetation dynamics, not temperature. The largest tagged individuals all moved, whereas only some mid-sized individuals moved, and the smallest individuals never left lowland areas. The timing of movements varied with body size: large individuals moved upward (as lowland forage quality declined) earlier in the year than did mid-sized individuals, while the timing of downward movements was unrelated to body size and occurred as lowland vegetation productivity peaked. Giant tortoises are unlikely candidates for forage-driven migration as they are well buffered against environmental fluctuations by large body size and a slow metabolism. Notably the largest, and presumably most dominant, individuals were most likely to migrate. This characteristic and the lack of sex-based differences in movement behaviour distinguish Galapagos tortoise movement from previously described partial migratory systems.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Keywords:  NDVI; allometry; megavertebrate; oceanic islands; partial migration

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23171344     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  14 in total

1.  Exploring conservation discourses in the Galapagos Islands: A case study of the Galapagos giant tortoises.

Authors:  Francisco Benitez-Capistros; Jean Hugé; Farid Dahdouh-Guebas; Nico Koedam
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Linking animal migration and ecosystem processes: Data-driven simulation of propagule dispersal by migratory herbivores.

Authors:  Marius Somveille; Diego Ellis-Soto
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 3.  Island rewilding with giant tortoises in an era of climate change.

Authors:  Wilfredo Falcón; Dennis M Hansen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The ecological consequences of megafaunal loss: giant tortoises and wetland biodiversity.

Authors:  Cynthia A Froyd; Emily E D Coffey; Willem O van der Knaap; Jacqueline F N van Leeuwen; Alan Tye; Katherine J Willis
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Drivers and fitness consequences of dispersive migration in a pelagic seabird.

Authors:  Annette L Fayet; Robin Freeman; Akiko Shoji; Dave Boyle; Holly L Kirk; Ben J Dean; Chris M Perrins; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Classification of Animal Movement Behavior through Residence in Space and Time.

Authors:  Leigh G Torres; Rachael A Orben; Irina Tolkova; David R Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Emergent conservation conflicts in the Galapagos Islands: Human-giant tortoise interactions in the rural area of Santa Cruz Island.

Authors:  Francisco Benitez-Capistros; Giorgia Camperio; Jean Hugé; Farid Dahdouh-Guebas; Nico Koedam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  A quantitative life history of endangered humpback chub that spawn in the Little Colorado River: variation in movement, growth, and survival.

Authors:  Charles B Yackulic; Michael D Yard; Josh Korman; David R Haverbeke
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Flexible characterization of animal movement pattern using net squared displacement and a latent state model.

Authors:  Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau; Jonathan R Potts; Charles B Yackulic; Jacqueline L Frair; E Hance Ellington; Stephen Blake
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.600

10.  Modeling Caribou Movements: Seasonal Ranges and Migration Routes of the Central Arctic Herd.

Authors:  Kerry L Nicholson; Stephen M Arthur; Jon S Horne; Edward O Garton; Patricia A Del Vecchio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.