| Literature DB >> 23170209 |
Sarah E Kingston1, Robert W Jernigan, William F Fagan, David Braun, Michael J Braun.
Abstract
Hybrid zones are unique biological interfaces that reveal both population level and species level evolutionary processes. A genome-scale approach to assess gene flow across hybrid zones is vital, and now possible. In Mexican towhees (genus Pipilo), several morphological hybrid gradients exist. We completed a genome survey across one such gradient (9 populations, 140 birds) using mitochondrial DNA, 28 isozyme, and 377 AFLP markers. To assess variation in introgression among loci, cline parameters (i.e., width, center) for the 61 clinally varying loci were estimated and compiled into genomic distributions for tests against three empirical models spanning the range of observed cline shape. No single model accounts for observed variation in cline shape among loci. Numerous backcross individuals near the gradient center confirm a hybrid origin for these populations, contrary to a previous hypothesis based on social mimicry and character displacement. In addition, the observed variation does not bin into well-defined categories of locus types (e.g., neutral vs. highly selected). Our multi-locus analysis reveals cross-genomic variation in selective constraints on gene flow and locus-specific flexibility in the permeability of the interspecies membrane.Entities:
Keywords: AFLP; Pipilo maculatus; Pipilo ocai; gene flow; hybridization; introgression; isozyme; mitochondrial DNA; tension zone model; towhee
Year: 2012 PMID: 23170209 PMCID: PMC3501626 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Photograph of Pipilo ocai, Nevado de Colima, Jalisco, Mexico (photograph by Sarah Kingston).
Figure 2Sampling locations of towhee populations along the Teziutlán hybrid gradient in the Sierra Madre Oriental. Numbered locations are detailed in Table 1.
Local area, plumage type, mean population hybrid index (plumage), coordinates, location elevation, and sample size of sampling locations ordered from north to south through the Teziutlán hybrid gradient
| Number | Location | Plumage type | Hybrid index | Lat | Long | Elevation (m) | Km from no. 1 | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coahuila | 24.0 | 25.250 | −100.450 | 2902 | 0 | 16 | |
| 2 | Queretaro | 22.8 | 20.783 | −99.567 | 3063 | 538 | 17 | |
| 3 | Tlaxco | hybrid | 21.5 | 19.667 | −98.167 | 2667 | 728 | 17 |
| 4 | E. Huichautla | hybrid | 17.8 | 19.783 | −97.600 | 2355 | 793 | 14 |
| 5 | Teziutlán | hybrid | 14.9 | 19.817 | −97.367 | 1956 | 818 | 15 |
| 6 | R. Palenquillo | hybrid | 4.4 | 19.650 | −97.117 | 2383 | 846 | 16 |
| 7 | Cofre de Perote | hybrid | 3.4 | 19.567 | −97.100 | 3028 | 856 | 15 |
| 8 | Orizaba | 0.2 | 19.050 | −97.308 | 3781 | 917 | 16 | |
| 9 | Oaxaca | 0.0 | 17.167 | −96.633 | 2760 | 1156 | 14 | |
| Total | 140 |
Adapters and primers used in the AFLP assay
| Oligo name | Sequence |
|---|---|
| EcoRIadp_F | CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC |
| EcoRIadp_R | AATTGGTACGCAGTCTAC |
| TaqIadp_F | GACGATGAGTCCTGAC |
| TaqIadp_R | CGGTCAGGACTCAT |
| EcoRIpresel | GACTGCGTACCAATTCA |
| TaqIpresel | GATGAGTCCTGACCGAA |
| EcoRI + AAC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAC |
| EcoRI + AAG | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAG |
| TaqI + AAC | GATGAGTCCTGACCGAAAC |
| TaqI + AAG | GATGAGTCCTGACCGAAAG |
| TaqI + ACA | GATGAGTCCTGACCGAACA |
| TaqI + ACT | GATGAGTCCTGACCGAACT |
| TaqI + AGA | GATGAGTCCTGACCGAAGA |
Figure 3Cline models fit to empirical data for all 61 clinal loci using Analyse 1.3. Panel A shows the mtDNA (bold) and nine isozyme loci, whereas panel B shows the 51 AFLP loci. Sampling locations are noted on the secondary X-axis starting with population 1 at 0 km transect distance.
Figure 4Distributions of cline centers and widths for AFLP (51) and isozyme (9) loci. Mitochondrial locus position is indicated by arrows. 95% confidence intervals for the bootstrap support on three empirical models (steep, median, and wide-shifted) are indicated by shading or cross-hatching.
Pearson correlation coefficients (lower diagonal) and associated p-values (upper diagonal) for pair-wise comparisons of cline center shift, width, and both parental and transect-wide FST
| Center shift | Width | Parental | Transect- wide | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center shift | 1 | |||
| Width | 0.329 | 1 | ||
| Parental | 0.074 | −0.170 | 1 | |
| Transect- wide | −0.082 | −0.260 | 0.775 | 1 |
Figure 5Principal co-ordinates in two dimensions performed on the asymmetrical log likelihood model fit matrix of the 61 different clinal loci.