Sonia Rouatbi1, Ashraf Alqodwa, Samia Ben Mdella, Helmi Ben Saad. 1. Service of Physiology and Functional Explorations, Farhat HACHED Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia; Laboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
Abstract
AIMS: (i) To identify factors that influence the FeNO values in healthy North African, Arab children aged 6-16 years; (ii) to test the applicability and reliability of the previously published FeNO norms; and (iii) if needed, to establish FeNO norms in this population, and to prospectively assess its reliability. POPULATION AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analytical study. A convenience sample of healthy Tunisian children, aged 6-16 years was recruited. First subjects have responded to two questionnaires, and then FeNO levels were measured by an online method with electrochemical analyzer (Medisoft, Sorinnes [Dinant], Belgium). Anthropometric and spirometric data were collected. Simple and a multiple linear regressions were determined. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and upper limit of normal (ULN) were defined. RESULTS: Two hundred eleven children (107 boys) were retained. Anthropometric data, gender, socioeconomic level, obesity or puberty status, and sports activity were not independent influencing variables. Total sample FeNO data appeared to be influenced only by maximum mid expiratory flow (l sec(-1) ; r(2) = 0.0236, P = 0.0516). For boys, only 1st second forced expiratory volume (l) explains a slight (r(2) = 0.0451) but significant FeNO variability (P = 0.0281). For girls, FeNO was not significantly correlated with any children determined data. For North African/Arab children, FeNO values were significantly lower than in other populations and the available published FeNO norms did not reliably predict FeNO in our population. The mean ± SD (95% CI ULN, minimum-maximum) of FeNO (ppb) for the total sample was 5.0 ± 2.9 (5.4, 1.0-17.0). For North African, Arab children of any age, any FeNO value greater than 17.0 ppb may be considered abnormal. Finally, in an additional group of children prospectively assessed, we found no child with a FeNO higher than 17.0 ppb. CONCLUSION: Our FeNO norms enrich the global repository of FeNO norms the pediatrician can use to choose the most appropriate norms based on children's location or ethnicity.
AIMS: (i) To identify factors that influence the FeNO values in healthy North African, Arab children aged 6-16 years; (ii) to test the applicability and reliability of the previously published FeNO norms; and (iii) if needed, to establish FeNO norms in this population, and to prospectively assess its reliability. POPULATION AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analytical study. A convenience sample of healthy Tunisian children, aged 6-16 years was recruited. First subjects have responded to two questionnaires, and then FeNO levels were measured by an online method with electrochemical analyzer (Medisoft, Sorinnes [Dinant], Belgium). Anthropometric and spirometric data were collected. Simple and a multiple linear regressions were determined. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and upper limit of normal (ULN) were defined. RESULTS: Two hundred eleven children (107 boys) were retained. Anthropometric data, gender, socioeconomic level, obesity or puberty status, and sports activity were not independent influencing variables. Total sample FeNO data appeared to be influenced only by maximum mid expiratory flow (l sec(-1) ; r(2) = 0.0236, P = 0.0516). For boys, only 1st second forced expiratory volume (l) explains a slight (r(2) = 0.0451) but significant FeNO variability (P = 0.0281). For girls, FeNO was not significantly correlated with any children determined data. For North African/Arab children, FeNO values were significantly lower than in other populations and the available published FeNO norms did not reliably predict FeNO in our population. The mean ± SD (95% CI ULN, minimum-maximum) of FeNO (ppb) for the total sample was 5.0 ± 2.9 (5.4, 1.0-17.0). For North African, Arab children of any age, any FeNO value greater than 17.0 ppb may be considered abnormal. Finally, in an additional group of children prospectively assessed, we found no child with a FeNO higher than 17.0 ppb. CONCLUSION: Our FeNO norms enrich the global repository of FeNO norms the pediatrician can use to choose the most appropriate norms based on children's location or ethnicity.
Authors: Erika Garcia; Yue Zhang; Edward B Rappaport; Kiros Berhane; Patrick Muchmore; Philip E Silkoff; Noa Molshatzki; Frank D Gilliland; Sandrah P Eckel Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Ran Wang; Stephen J Fowler; Stephen W Turner; Sarah Drake; Laura Healy; Lesley Lowe; Hannah Wardman; Miriam Bennett; Adnan Custovic; Angela Simpson; Clare S Murray Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2022-09-12
Authors: Sonia Rouatbi; Mohamed Ali Chouchene; Ines Sfaxi; Mohamed Ben Rejeb; Zouhair Tabka; Helmi Ben Saad Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 3.411