Literature DB >> 23169531

Co-motif discovery identifies an Esrrb-Sox2-DNA ternary complex as a mediator of transcriptional differences between mouse embryonic and epiblast stem cells.

Andrew Paul Hutchins1, Siew Hua Choo, Tapan Kumar Mistri, Mehran Rahmani, Chow Thai Woon, Calista Keow Leng Ng, Ralf Jauch, Paul Robson.   

Abstract

Transcription factors (TF) often bind in heterodimeric complexes with each TF recognizing a specific neighboring cis element in the regulatory region of the genome. Comprehension of this DNA motif grammar is opaque, yet recent developments have allowed the interrogation of genome-wide TF binding sites. We reasoned that within this data novel motif grammars could be identified that controlled distinct biological programs. For this purpose, we developed a novel motif-discovery tool termed fexcom that systematically interrogates ChIP-seq data to discover spatially constrained TF-TF composite motifs occurring over short DNA distances. We applied this to the extensive ChIP-seq data available from mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). In addition to the well-known and most prevalent sox-oct motif, we also discovered a novel constrained spacer motif for Esrrb and Sox2 with a gap of between 2 and 8 bps that Essrb and Sox2 cobind in a selective fashion. Through the use of knockdown experiments, we argue that the Esrrb-Sox2 complex is an arbiter of gene expression differences between ESCs and epiblast stem cells (EpiSC). A number of genes downregulated upon dual Esrrb/Sox2 knockdown (e.g., Klf4, Klf5, Jam2, Pecam1) are similarly downregulated in the ESC to EpiSC transition and contain the esrrb-sox motif. The prototypical Esrrb-Sox2 target gene, containing an esrrb-sox element conserved throughout eutherian and metatherian mammals, is Nr0b1. Through positive regulation of this transcriptional repressor, we argue the Esrrb-Sox2 complex promotes the ESC state through inhibition of the EpiSC transcriptional program and the same trio may also function to maintain trophoblast stem cells.
Copyright © 2012 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23169531     DOI: 10.1002/stem.1279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  16 in total

Review 1.  Molecular features of cellular reprogramming and development.

Authors:  Zachary D Smith; Camille Sindhu; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Stable methylation at promoters distinguishes epiblast stem cells from embryonic stem cells and the in vivo epiblasts.

Authors:  Anne-Clémence Veillard; Hendrik Marks; Andreia Sofia Bernardo; Luc Jouneau; Denis Laloë; Laurent Boulanger; Anita Kaan; Vincent Brochard; Matteo Tosolini; Roger Pedersen; Henk Stunnenberg; Alice Jouneau
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Cdx2 efficiently induces trophoblast stem-like cells in naïve, but not primed, pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Stephanie Blij; Anthony Parenti; Neeloufar Tabatabai-Yazdi; Amy Ralston
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Comparative FAIRE-seq analysis reveals distinguishing features of the chromatin structure of ground state- and primed-pluripotent cells.

Authors:  Matthew Murtha; Francesco Strino; Zeynep Tokcaer-Keskin; N Sumru Bayin; Doaa Shalabi; Xiangmei Xi; Yuval Kluger; Lisa Dailey
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  An evolutionarily conserved long noncoding RNA TUNA controls pluripotency and neural lineage commitment.

Authors:  Nianwei Lin; Kung-Yen Chang; Zhonghan Li; Keith Gates; Zacharia A Rana; Jason Dang; Danhua Zhang; Tianxu Han; Chao-Shun Yang; Thomas J Cunningham; Steven R Head; Gregg Duester; P Duc Si Dong; Tariq M Rana
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Interactions between pluripotency factors specify cis-regulation in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Chris Fiore; Barak A Cohen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A direct physical interaction between Nanog and Sox2 regulates embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Alessia Gagliardi; Nicholas P Mullin; Zi Ying Tan; Douglas Colby; Anastasia I Kousa; Florian Halbritter; Jason T Weiss; Anastasia Felker; Karel Bezstarosti; Rebecca Favaro; Jeroen Demmers; Silvia K Nicolis; Simon R Tomlinson; Raymond A Poot; Ian Chambers
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Systematic identification of transcriptional regulatory modules from protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Diego Diez; Andrew Paul Hutchins; Diego Miranda-Saavedra
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Genomic and molecular control of cell type and cell type conversions.

Authors:  Xiuling Fu; Fangfang He; Yuhao Li; Allahverdi Shahveranov; Andrew Paul Hutchins
Journal:  Cell Regen (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-22

10.  Selective influence of Sox2 on POU transcription factor binding in embryonic and neural stem cells.

Authors:  Tapan Kumar Mistri; Arun George Devasia; Lee Thean Chu; Wei Ping Ng; Florian Halbritter; Douglas Colby; Ben Martynoga; Simon R Tomlinson; Ian Chambers; Paul Robson; Thorsten Wohland
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 8.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.