Theresa Mickiewicz1, Alia Al-Tayyib, Mark Thrun, Cornelis Rietmeijer. 1. Department of Public Health, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80204, USA. theresa.mickiewicz@dhha.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Partner notification of exposure to gonorrhea or chlamydia is traditionally conducted by the index case or a disease intervention specialist. However, a significant proportion of partners remain untreated and thus are at risk for continued transmission. Expedited partner therapy (EPT) obviates the requirement for a health care visit by the partner: the index case delivers medications to the partner. Although shown to be efficacious in randomized control trials, effectiveness studies of delivering EPT in real-world situations are needed. We describe the implementation, patient characteristics, and clinical impact of an EPT program at the Denver Metro Health Clinic (DMHC). METHODS: We identified 2578 patient visits eligible for EPT (heterosexual men or women diagnosed as having chlamydia or gonorrhea) from November, 2006, to April, 2011. We examined EPT acceptance rates over clinical process improvements. To measure clinical impact, we assessed the association between initial acceptance of EPT and infection status among 351 patients who returned for retesting. RESULTS: Requiring complete documentation of EPT in the clinic electronic medical record increased EPT acceptance from 20% to 48%. Expedited partner therapy acceptance was associated with a reduced risk of chlamydial reinfection (odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.6) and a reduced risk of gonorrheal reinfection (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.4); however, these changes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Expedited partner therapy at the DMHC was substantially enhanced by process changes in the clinic and may be associated with a decreased risk of reinfection.
BACKGROUND: Partner notification of exposure to gonorrhea or chlamydia is traditionally conducted by the index case or a disease intervention specialist. However, a significant proportion of partners remain untreated and thus are at risk for continued transmission. Expedited partner therapy (EPT) obviates the requirement for a health care visit by the partner: the index case delivers medications to the partner. Although shown to be efficacious in randomized control trials, effectiveness studies of delivering EPT in real-world situations are needed. We describe the implementation, patient characteristics, and clinical impact of an EPT program at the Denver Metro Health Clinic (DMHC). METHODS: We identified 2578 patient visits eligible for EPT (heterosexual men or women diagnosed as having chlamydia or gonorrhea) from November, 2006, to April, 2011. We examined EPT acceptance rates over clinical process improvements. To measure clinical impact, we assessed the association between initial acceptance of EPT and infection status among 351 patients who returned for retesting. RESULTS: Requiring complete documentation of EPT in the clinic electronic medical record increased EPT acceptance from 20% to 48%. Expedited partner therapy acceptance was associated with a reduced risk of chlamydial reinfection (odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.6) and a reduced risk of gonorrheal reinfection (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.4); however, these changes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Expedited partner therapy at the DMHC was substantially enhanced by process changes in the clinic and may be associated with a decreased risk of reinfection.
Authors: Christine M Khosropour; Julia C Dombrowksi; James P Hughes; Lisa E Manhart; Matthew R Golden Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ryan Cramer; Nina Martinez; Craig Roberts; Melissa A Habel; E Victor Leino; Jami S Leichliter Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Mark R Stenger; Roxanne P Kerani; Heidi M Bauer; Nicole Burghardt; Greta L Anschuetz; Ellen Klingler; Christina M Schumacher; Julie Simon; Matthew Golden Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Matthew R Golden; Roxanne P Kerani; Mark Stenger; James P Hughes; Mark Aubin; Cheryl Malinski; King K Holmes Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 11.069