Literature DB >> 2316917

Pharmacokinetics, inhibition of lymphoblast transformation, and toxicity of cyclosporine in clinically normal pigs.

S L Vaden1, J E Riviere.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated from time-concentration data obtained after IV (10 mg/kg of body weight; n =9) and oral (12.5 mg/kg to group A [n = 3]; 25 mg/kg to group B [n = 3]; and 50 mg/kg to group C [n = 3] pigs) cyclosporine (formerly, cyclosporine A) administration. Resulting mean (+/- SD) pharmacokinetic variables were as follows: half life of distribution, 0.96 (+/- 0.7) hours; half life of elimination, 7.71 (+/- 2.6) hours; volume of distribution at steady state, 4.47 (+/- 2.22) L/kg; volume of the central compartment, 1.71 (+/- 0.78) L/kg; and systemic clearance, 8.95 (+/- 2.7) ml/kg/min. Oral bioavailability was: overall 57 (+/- 19) %; group A, 44 (+/- 11) %; group B, 78 (+/- 15) %; group C, 48 (+/- 6) %. Time to peak concentration was 3.55 (+/- 0.88) hours. During the 22 days of daily oral cyclosporine administration, blood 24-hour trough concentrations were: group A, 224.3 (+/- 78.4) ng/ml; group B, 640.7 (+/- 174.6) ng/ml; and group C, 2,344 (+/- 1,095) ng/ml. Lymphoblast transformation stimulation index was suppressed in all pigs except 1, which had a corresponding cyclosporine concentration of 92.4 ng/ml. Minimal, although statistically significant, decreases in serum albumin and magnesium concentrations and increases in serum creatinine and urea nitrogen concentrations were evident in pigs of some treatment groups. Histologic examination of necropsy specimens revealed mild hepatic necrosis (n = 1 pig), renal tubular dilatation (n = 5), and pulmonary inflammation (n = 2). Pigs given 25 and 50 mg of cyclosporine/kg failed to gain weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2316917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  2 in total

1.  Effect of tumor presence on cisplatin and carboplatin: disposition in the isolated, perfused tumor and skin flap.

Authors:  S L Vaden; P L Williams; R L Page; J E Riviere
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Immunosuppression for in vivo research: state-of-the-art protocols and experimental approaches.

Authors:  Rita Diehl; Fabienne Ferrara; Claudia Müller; Antje Y Dreyer; Damian D McLeod; Stephan Fricke; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 11.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.