Literature DB >> 23169152

Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of sexual function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Stacey Carter1, Jesse D Le, Jim C Hu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although cure of prostate cancer is the primary goal of radical prostatectomy, preserving erectile function is also tantamount, given the indolent clinical course of most prostate cancers, particularly low-risk disease. In order to optimize postprostatectomy erectile function during a robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, there must be a detailed understanding of pelvic anatomy to recognize the optimal nerve-sparing plane and technical finesse to minimize stretch injury to the neurovascular bundle. RECENT
FINDINGS: The magnified, well illuminated robotic-operative field coupled with less blood loss has paralleled greater understanding of the periprostatic 'fascial' planes, leading to differentiation of intrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing approaches. However, refinement of tissue handling during nerve-sparing to minimize lateral displacement of the neurovascular bundle and attenuate neurapraxia enables earlier and better recovery of erectile function.
SUMMARY: The critical maneuvers to preserving erectile function are atraumatic dissection of the prostate away from the optimal nerve-sparing plane to maximally preserve nerve fibers while minimizing neurapraxia. Therefore, attaining these principles involves a conceptual paradigm shift from 'radical' prostatectomy to neurosurgery of the prostate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23169152     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835b6602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Sarvesh Tandon; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-01

Review 2.  Nerve-sparing techniques and results in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hasan Hüseyin Tavukçu; Omer Aytac; Fatih Atug
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-12-08

3.  A novel intraoperative physician-assigned grading score to predict postoperative return of potency at 1 year after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rajesh R Bajpai; Shirin Razdan; Marcos A Sanchez; Sanjay Razdan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Quality of Life and Sexual Health in the Aging of PCa Survivors.

Authors:  Mauro Gacci; Elisabetta Baldi; Lara Tamburrino; Beatrice Detti; Lorenzo Livi; Cosimo De Nunzio; Andrea Tubaro; Stavros Gravas; Marco Carini; Sergio Serni
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 5.  Prevention and management of post prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Andrea Salonia; Giulia Castagna; Paolo Capogrosso; Fabio Castiglione; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-08

6.  Comparison of intrafascial and non-intrafascial radical prostatectomy for low risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zhankui Zhao; Haizhou Zhu; Honglian Yu; Qingsheng Kong; Chengjuan Fan; Lin Meng; Chuanxin Liu; Xiegang Ding
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.